Cited by 449Sports injuries and preventionSports Performance and TrainingSports Dynamics and Biomechanics

Spikes in acute workload are associated with increased injury risk in elite cricket fast bowlers

Hulin, Billy T, Gabbett, Tim J, Blanch, Peter, Chapman, Paul, Bailey, David, Orchard, John W·2014·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To determine if the comparison of acute and chronic workload is associated with increased injury risk in elite cricket fast bowlers. Methods: Data were collected from 28 fast bowlers who completed a total of 43 individual seasons over a 6-year period. Workloads were estimated by summarising the total number of balls bowled per week (external workload), and by multiplying the session rating of perceived exertion by the session duration (internal workload). One-week data (acute workload), together with 4-week rolling average data (chronic workload), were calculated for external and internal workloads. The size of the acute workload in relation to the chronic workload provided either a negative or positive training-stress balance. Results: A negative training-stress balance was associated with an increased risk of injury in the week after exposure, for internal workload (relative risk (RR)=2.2 (CI 1.91 to 2.53), p=0.009), and external workload (RR=2.1 (CI 1.81 to 2.44), p=0.01). Fast bowlers with an internal workload training-stress balance of greater than 200% had a RR of injury of 4.5 (CI 3.43 to 5.90, p=0.009) compared with those with a training-stress balance between 50% and 99%. Fast bowlers with an external workload training-stress balance of more than 200% had a RR of injury of 3.3 (CI 1.50 to 7.25, p=0.033) in comparison to fast bowlers with an external workload training-stress balance between 50% and 99%. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that large increases in acute workload are associated with increased injury risk in elite cricket fast bowlers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092524

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hulin, B. T., Gabbett, T. J., Blanch, P., Chapman, P., Bailey, D., & Orchard, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • Centre of Excellence, Cricket Australia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Cricket New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Cricket Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Gabbett, Tim J
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-08-20
Volume
48
Issue
8
Pages
708-712
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2103804275
Cited by
449
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
20.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Keywords
injury risk, fast bowlers, crickets, external load, session rating of perceived exertion, elite athletes
MeSH terms
Adult, Athletic Injuries, Humans, Male, New South Wales, Risk Factors, Stress, Physiological, Track and Field, Victoria, Exercise, Workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review