Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Subclinical coronary artery disease in veteran athletes: is a new preparticipation methodology required?

Dores, Hélder, de Araújo Gonçalves, Pedro, Monge, José, Costa, Rogério, Tátá, Luis, Malhotra, Aneil, Sharma, Sanjay, Cardim, Nuno, Neuparth, Nuno·2020·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Objective: Preparticipation evaluation of veteran athletes should focus on accurate cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification and subclinical detection of coronary artery disease (CAD), which is the main cause of sudden cardiac death in this population. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of current preparticipation methodology used to identify veteran athletes with high coronary atherosclerotic burden. Methods: A total of 105 asymptomatic male athletes aged ≥40 years old, with low to moderate CV risk (Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation <5%) who trained ≥4 hours/week for at least 5 years, were studied. The screening protocol included clinical evaluation, ECG, transthoracic echocardiogram and exercise testing. Cardiac CT was performed to detect CAD, defined as a high atherosclerotic burden according to coronary artery calcium score and coronary CT angiography. Results: The majority of the athletes (n=88) engaged in endurance sports, with a median volume of exercise of 66 (44; 103) metabolic equivalent task score/hour/week. Exercise testing was abnormal in 13 (12.4%) athletes, 6 (5.7%) with electrocardiographic criteria for myocardial ischaemia and 7 (6.7%) with exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias. A high coronary atherosclerotic burden was present in 27 (25.7%) athletes, of whom 11 (40.7%) had CV risk factors and 6 had abnormal exercise tests, including 3 who were positive for myocardial ischaemia. Conclusions: Conventional methodology used in preparticipation evaluation of veteran athletes, based on clinical CV risk factors and exercise testing, was poor at identifying significant subclinical CAD. The inclusion of more objective markers, particularly data derived from cardiac CT, is promising for more accurate CV risk stratification of these athletes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099840

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.1032 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn163 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1055/s-0034-1399221 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/2047487316651825 · DOI
  5. 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000341 · DOI
  6. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002598 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Budoff, 2008, Expert review on coronary calcium, Vasc Health Risk Manag, 4, 315, 10.2147/VHRM.S1160 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.079 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014310 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1001/jama.2012.9624 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht293 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.064 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00114-3 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.033 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.015 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Wu FZ , Wu MT . 2014 SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2015;9.doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2015.01.003 · DOI
  20. 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001047 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1007/s10554-013-0232-8 · DOI
  22. 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002332 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.tcm.2015.03.016 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht296 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1161/01.CIR.80.1.87 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1111/sms.12404 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.074 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Cho, 2018, Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography findings in asymptomatic individuals: a 6-year follow-up from the prospective multicentre international CONFIRM study, Eur Heart J, 39, 934, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx774 · DOI
  29. 10.1161/01.CIR.101.8.850 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Dores, H., de Araújo Gonçalves, P., Monge, J., Costa, R., Tátá, L., Malhotra, A., Sharma, S., Cardim, N., & Neuparth, N.
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-11-09
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
349-353
ISSN
  • 0306-3674
  • 1473-0480
Cited by
25
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subclinical coronary artery disease in veteran athletes: is a new preparticipation methodology required? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjsports-2018-099840
The paper
Dores, H., de Araújo Gonçalves, P., Monge, J., Costa, R., Tátá, L., Malhotra, A., Sharma, S., Cardim, N., & Neuparth, N. (2020). Subclinical coronary artery disease in veteran athletes: is a new preparticipation methodology required? British Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-099840

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.