Cited by 1,122Cardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Comparison of novel risk markers for improvement in cardiovascular risk assessment in intermediate-risk individuals

Open access
Yeboah, Joseph, McClelland, Robyn L., Polonsky, Tamar S., Burke, Gregory L., Sibley, Christopher T., O’Leary, Daniel, Carr, Jeffery J., Goff, David C. +2 more·2012·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Risk markers including coronary artery calcium, carotid intima-media thickness, ankle-brachial index, brachial flow-mediated dilation, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), and family history of coronary heart disease (CHD) have been reported to improve on the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) for prediction of CHD, but there are no direct comparisons of these markers for risk prediction in a single cohort. OBJECTIVE: We compared improvement in prediction of incident CHD/cardiovascular disease (CVD) of these 6 risk markers within intermediate-risk participants (FRS >5%-<20%) in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Of 6814 MESA participants from 6 US field centers, 1330 were intermediate risk, without diabetes mellitus, and had complete data on all 6 markers. Recruitment spanned July 2000 to September 2002, with follow-up through May 2011. Probability-weighted Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) and net reclassification improvement were used to compare incremental contributions of each marker when added to the FRS, plus race/ethnicity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incident CHD defined as myocardial infarction, angina followed by revascularization, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or CHD death. Incident CVD additionally included stroke or CVD death. RESULTS: After 7.6-year median follow-up (IQR, 7.3-7.8), 94 CHD and 123 CVD events occurred. Coronary artery calcium, ankle-brachial index, high-sensitivity CRP, and family history were independently associated with incident CHD in multivariable analyses (HR, 2.60 [95% CI, 1.94-3.50]; HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.66-0.95]; HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.00-1.64]; and HR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.38-3.42], respectively). Carotid intima-media thickness and brachial flow-mediated dilation were not associated with incident CHD in multivariable analyses (HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.95-1.45] and HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.78-1.14]). Although addition of the markers individually to the FRS plus race/ethnicity improved AUC, coronary artery calcium afforded the highest increment (0.623 vs 0.784), while brachial flow-mediated dilation had the least (0.623 vs 0.639). For incident CHD, the net reclassification improvement with coronary artery calcium was 0.659, brachial flow-mediated dilation was 0.024, ankle-brachial index was 0.036, carotid intima-media thickness was 0.102, family history was 0.160 and high-sensitivity CRP was 0.079. Similar results were obtained for incident CVD. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary artery calcium, ankle-brachial index, high-sensitivity CRP, and family history were independent predictors of incident CHD/CVD in intermediate-risk individuals. Coronary artery calcium provided superior discrimination and risk reclassification compared with other risk markers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2012.9624

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Greenland P Alpert JS American College of Cardiology Foundation American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Circulation 2010 122 e584 636 21098428

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeboah, J., McClelland, R. L., Polonsky, T. S., Burke, G. L., Sibley, C. T., O’Leary, D., Carr, J. J., Goff, D. C., Greenland, P., & Herrington, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Wake Forest University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Colorado School of Public Health (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Yeboah, Joseph
Venue
JAMA
Published
2012-08-22
Volume
308
Issue
8
Pages
788
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2165187589
Cited by
1,122
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 113 · 2015: 97 · 2014: 104 · 2013: 99 · 2012: 15
FWCI
64.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc95164-17-0-1, n01hc95165-34-0-1, n01hc95161-24-0-1, n01hc95166-21-0-1, n01hc95162-31-0-1, n01hc95160-18-0-1, n01hc095167-000, n01hc95163-22-0-1, n01hc95159-40-0-1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01 HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC-095165, N01 HC95167, (N01-HC-95163, N01 HC-95161, N01 HC95165, N01HC95164, N01-HC-095159, N01 HC095167, N01‐HC‐95166, N01 HC-95162, R01HL098445)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
cardiovascular risk prediction, coronary artery calcium, carotid intima-media thickness, ankle-brachial index, flow-mediated dilation, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, family history of coronary heart disease, Framingham risk score, coronary artery disease, cardiovascular disease, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, net reclassification improvement, risk indicators, myocardial infarction
MeSH terms
Aged, C-Reactive Protein, Calcium, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Vessels, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Risk Assessment, Ankle Brachial Index, Carotid Intima-Media Thickness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review