The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of anxiety in elite athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To identify and quantify determinants of anxiety symptoms and disorders experienced by elite athletes. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: Five online databases (PubMed, SportDiscus, PsycINFO, Scopus and Cochrane) were searched up to November 2018 to identify eligible citations. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Articles were included if they were published in English, were quantitative studies and measured a symptom-level anxiety outcome in competing or retired athletes at the professional (including professional youth), Olympic or collegiate/university levels. Results and summary: We screened 1163 articles; 61 studies were included in the systematic review and 27 of them were suitable for meta-analysis. Overall risk of bias for included studies was low. Athletes and non-athletes had no differences in anxiety profiles (d=−0.11, p=0.28). Pooled effect sizes, demonstrating moderate effects, were identified for (1) career dissatisfaction (d=0.45; higher anxiety in dissatisfied athletes), (2) gender (d=0.38; higher anxiety in female athletes), (3) age (d=−0.34; higher anxiety for younger athletes) and (4) musculoskeletal injury (d=0.31; higher anxiety for injured athletes). A small pooled effect was found for recent adverse life events (d=0.26)—higher anxiety in athletes who had experienced one or more recent adverse life events. Conclusion: Determinants of anxiety in elite populations broadly reflect those experienced by the general population. Clinicians should be aware of these general and athlete-specific determinants of anxiety among elite athletes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 · Cited by 20,391
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments
(2005) · doi:10.1002/0470870168 · Cited by 2,368
Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity
Borenstein, M., Higgins, J. P. T., Hedges, L. V., & Rothstein, H. R. (2017) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1230 · Cited by 1,848
Meta-Analysis: Recent Developments in Quantitative Methods for Literature Reviews
Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59 · Cited by 1,780
On the Use of Beta Coefficients in Meta-Analysis.
Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175 · Cited by 1,643
Size and burden of mental disorders in Europe—a critical review and appraisal of 27 studies
Wittchen, H.-U., & Jacobi, F. (2005) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.04.012 · Cited by 1,503
How Many Studies Do You Need?: A Primer on Statistical Power for Meta-Analysis
Valentine, J. C., Pigott, T. D., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/1076998609346961 · Cited by 1,294
A Shortened Version of the Profile of Mood States
Shacham, S. (1983) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4703_14 · Cited by 1,231
The Mental Health of Elite Athletes: A Narrative Systematic Review
Rice, S. M., Purcell, R., De Silva, S., Mawren, D., McGorry, P. D., & Parker, A. G. (2016) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0492-2 · Cited by 1,205
Self-citationWhiteford, H. A., Ferrari, A. J., Degenhardt, L., Feigin, V., & Vos, T. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116820 · Cited by 1,175
Attention and Anxiety: Different Attentional Functioning Under State and Trait Anxiety
Pacheco-Unguetti, A. P., Acosta, A., Callejas, A., & Lupiáñez, J. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797609359624 · Cited by 415
Leach, L. S., Christensen, H., Mackinnon, A. J., Windsor, T. D., & Butterworth, P. (2008) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-008-0388-z · Cited by 413
Self-report bias and underreporting of depression on the BDI-II
Hunt, M., Auriemma, J., & Cashaw, A. C. A. (2003) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8001_10 · Cited by 301
Cavanagh, A., Wilson, C. J., Kavanagh, D. J., & Caputi, P. (2017) · Harvard Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/hrp.0000000000000128 · Cited by 295
Rice, S. M., Fallon, B. J., Aucote, H. M., & Möller-Leimkühler, A. M. (2013) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.08.013 · Cited by 244
Self-citationAustralia’s Innovation in Youth Mental Health Care: The Headspace Centre Model
Rickwood, D., Paraskakis, M., Quin, D., Hobbs, N., Ryall, V., Trethowan, J., & McGorry, P. (2019) · Early Intervention in Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/eip.12740 · Cited by 237
Gross, M., Moore, Z. E., Gardner, F. L., Wolanin, A. T., Pess, R., & Marks, D. R. (2018) · International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1612197x.2016.1250802 · Cited by 213
Worry and Metacognitions as Predictors of Anxiety Symptoms: A Prospective Study
Ryum, T., Kennair, L. E. O., Hjemdal, O., Hagen, R., Halvorsen, J. Ø., & Solem, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00924 · Cited by 82
Rice, S. M., Kealy, D., Oliffe, J. L., & Ogrodniczuk, J. S. (2019) · Early Intervention in Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/eip.12667 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Cited by
Purcell, R., Gwyther, K., & Rice, S. M. (2019) · Sports Medicine - Open · doi:10.1186/s40798-019-0220-1 · Cited by 394
Self-citationPurcell, R., Rice, S., Butterworth, M., & Clements, M. (2020) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-020-01266-z · Cited by 100
Self-citationKuettel, A., Pedersen, A. K., & Larsen, C. H. (2021) · Psychology of Sport and Exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101837 · Cited by 89
Risk and protective factors for mental ill-health in elite para- and non-para athletes
Olive, L. S., Rice, S. M., Gao, C., Pilkington, V., Walton, C. C., Butterworth, M., Abbott, L., Cross, G., Clements, M., & Purcell, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939087 · Cited by 26
Self-citationSilva, H., Del Coso, J., & Pickering, C. (2025) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-025-02245-y · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Rice, S. M., Gwyther, K., Santesteban-Echarri, O., Baron, D., Gorczynski, P., Gouttebarge, V., Reardon, C. L., Hitchcock, M. E., Hainline, B., & Purcell, R.
- Venue
- British Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2019-05-16
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 722-730
- ISSN
- 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0480
- OpenAlex
- W2946127329
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
