The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coated mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid) versus sulphasalazine in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis: a randomised trial.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE--To assess the safety and efficacy of a preparation of mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid) coated with a pH dependent resin (Eudragit L) as compared with sulphasalazine in patients with active mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. DESIGN--Eight week randomised double blind parallel group study. SETTING--Forty six gastroenterology outpatient clinics in seven countries. PATIENTS--Two hundred and twenty patients aged 18-70 who met the following criteria: clinical activity index greater than or equal to 6 and endoscopic index greater than or equal to 4; no concomitant treatment for ulcerative colitis; no hypersensitivity to salicylates or sulphonamides. Of the 164 patients eligible for efficacy analysis, 87 received the coated preparation of mesalazine and 77 sulphasalazine. Most of the remaining patients (28 in each group) were ineligible for the efficacy analysis because of treatment with steroid enemas. All pretrial characteristics were comparable in the two treatment groups. INTERVENTIONS--Coated mesalazine (Mesasal) 1.5 g daily or sulphasalazine 3.0 g daily for eight weeks. Compliance monitored by pill counts. END POINT--Clinical and endoscopic remission. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--Clinical activity measured by daily diary cards, assessment by investigators, and laboratory findings. Endoscopic evaluation at week 8. After four weeks 50 of 70 patients (71%) taking coated mesalazine and 38 of 58 (66%) taking sulphasalazine had achieved remission of their disease by eight weeks remission rates were 74% (37/50 patients) and 81% (35/43) in the two treatment groups respectively. Endoscopic remission at eight weeks was recorded in 20 of 41 patients (49%) taking coated mesalazine and 18 of 38 (47%) taking sulphasalazine. There was a higher incidence of adverse events among patients taking sulphasalazine (25/105; 24%) than among those taking coated mesalazine (16/115; 14%). CONCLUSION--Mesalazine coated with Eudragit L is a safe, logical alternative to sulphasalazine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enhanced synthesis of leukotriene B4 by colonic mucosa in inflammatory bowel disease
Sharon, P., & Stenson, W. F. (1984) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(84)80015-3 · Cited by 738
Red cell abnormalities associated with sulphasalazine maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis
Pounder, R. E., Craven, E. R., Henthorn, J. S., & Bannatyne, J. M. (1975) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.16.3.181 · Cited by 49
Cited by
Kruis, W., Frič, P., Pokrotnieks, J., Lukáš, M., Fixa, B., Kaščák, M., Kamm, M. A., Weismueller, J., Beglinger, C., Stolte, M., et al. (2004) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2003.037747 · Cited by 1,285
Mittermaier, C., Dejaco, C., Waldhoer, T., Oefferlbauer-Ernst, A., Miehsler, W., Beier, M., Tillinger, W., Gangl, A., & Moser, G. (2004) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000106907.24881.f2 · Cited by 532
Clark, M., Colombel, J.-F., Feagan, B. C., Fedorak, R. N., Hanauer, S. B., Kamm, M. A., Mayer, L., Regueiro, C., Rutgeerts, P., Sandborn, W. J., et al. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.05.006 · Cited by 224
Tamaki, H., Nakase, H., Inoue, S., Kawanami, C., Itani, T., Ohana, M., Kusaka, T., Uose, S., Hisatsune, H., Tojo, M., et al. (2016) · Digestive Endoscopy · doi:10.1111/den.12553 · Cited by 214
Berni Canani, R., Terrin, G., Rapacciuolo, L., Miele, E., Siani, M. C., Puzone, C., Cosenza, L., Staiano, A., & Troncone, R. (2008) · Digestive and Liver Disease · doi:10.1016/j.dld.2008.01.017 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Rachmilewitz, D.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1989-01-14
- Volume
- 298
- Issue
- 6666
- Pages
- 82-86
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2166930089
- Cited by
- 1,039
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coated mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid) versus sulphasalazine in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis: a randomised trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.298.6666.82
- The paper
- Rachmilewitz, D. (1989). Coated mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid) versus sulphasalazine in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis: a randomised trial. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.298.6666.82
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.