Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism: population based case-control study

Open access
Gutthann, Susanne Pérez, Rodriguez, Luis A Garcia, Castellsague, Jordi, Oliart, Alberto Duque·1997·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association between use of hormone replacement therapy and the risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. Design: Population based case-control study. Setting: Population enrolled in the General Practice Research Database, United Kingdom. Subjects: A cohort of 347 253 women aged 50 to 79 without major risk factors for venous thromboembolism was identified. Cases were 292 women admitted to hospital for a first episode of pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis; 10 000 controls were randomly selected from the source cohort. Main outcome measures: Adjusted relative risks estimated from unconditional logistic regression. Results: The adjusted odds ratio of venous thromboembolism for current use of hormone replacement therapy compared with non-users was 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 3.2). This increased risk was restricted to first year users, with odds ratios of 4.6 (2.5 to 8.4) during the first six months and 3.0 (1.4 to 6.5) 6-12 months after starting treatment. No major risk differences were observed between users of low and high doses of oestrogens, unopposed and opposed treatment, and oral and transdermal preparations. The risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolism among non-users of replacement therapy was estimated to be 1.3 per 10 000 women per year. Among current users, idiopathic venous thromboembolism occurs at two to three times the rate in non-users, resulting in one to two additional cases per 10 000 women per year. Conclusions: Current use of hormone replacement therapy was associated with a higher risk of venous thromboembolism, although the risk seemed to be restricted to the first year of use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.314.7083.796

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Metadata

Authors
Gutthann, S. P., Rodriguez, L. A. G., Castellsague, J., & Oliart, A. D.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1997-03-15
Volume
314
Issue
7083
Pages
796
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2021062942
Cited by
338
References
17
FWCI
18.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism: population based case-control study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.314.7083.796
The paper
Gutthann, S. P., Rodriguez, L. A. G., Castellsague, J., & Oliart, A. D. (1997). Hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism: population based case-control study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7083.796

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.