Cited by 632Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Estrogen plus progestin and risk of venous thrombosis

Open access
Cushman, Mary·2004·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Postmenopausal hormone therapy increases the risk of venous thrombosis. It is not known whether other factors influencing thrombosis add to this risk. OBJECTIVE: To report final data on incidence of venous thrombosis in the Women's Health Initiative Estrogen Plus Progestin clinical trial and the association of hormone therapy with venous thrombosis in the setting of other thrombosis risk factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind randomized controlled trial of 16,608 postmenopausal women between the ages of 50 and 79 years, who were enrolled in 1993 through 1998 at 40 US clinical centers with 5.6 years of follow up; and a nested case-control study. Baseline gene variants related to thrombosis risk were measured in the first 147 women who developed thrombosis and in 513 controls. INTERVENTION: Random assignment to 0.625 mg/d of conjugated equine estrogen plus 2.5 mg/d of medroxyprogesterone acetate, or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Centrally validated deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolus. RESULTS: Venous thrombosis occurred in 167 women taking estrogen plus progestin (3.5 per 1000 person-years) and in 76 taking placebo (1.7 per 1000 person-years); hazard ratio (HR), 2.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57-2.70). Compared with women between the ages of 50 and 59 years who were taking placebo, the risk associated with hormone therapy was higher with age: HR of 4.28 (95% CI, 2.38-7.72) for women aged 60 to 69 years and 7.46 (95% CI, 4.32-14.38) for women aged 70 to 79 years. Compared with women who were of normal weight and taking placebo, the risk associated with taking estrogen plus progestin was increased among overweight and obese women: HR of 3.80 (95% CI, 2.08-6.94) and 5.61 (95% CI, 3.12-10.11), respectively. Factor V Leiden enhanced the hormone-associated risk of thrombosis with a 6.69-fold increased risk compared with women in the placebo group without the mutation (95% CI, 3.09-14.49). Other genetic variants (prothrombin 20210A, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T, factor XIII Val34Leu, PAI-1 4G/5G, and factor V HR2) did not modify the association of hormone therapy with venous thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Estrogen plus progestin was associated with doubling the risk of venous thrombosis. Estrogen plus progestin therapy increased the risks associated with age, overweight or obesity, and factor V Leiden.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.292.13.1573

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Progestins with lowest possible androgenic action such as cyproterone acetate, chlormalidone, and drospirenone have been associated with increased risk of venous thrombosis.

    “Ideally, a progestin with the lowest possible androgenic action such as cyproterone acetate, chlormalidone, and drospirenone should be used. However, they have been associated with increased risk of venous thrombosis [65,66,67].”
  • In the Women's Health Initiative study, the risk of VTE due to MHT was highest in the first year of therapy, but persisted for the five years of follow-up.

    “In the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study, the risk of VTE due to MHT was highest in the first year of therapy, but persisted for the five years of follow-up [102].”

    From Estrogen and thrombosis: a bench to bedside review (2020) · cites this paper as [102]

  • In the WHI trial, VTE risk was increased with a hazard ratio of 2.06 (95% CI 1.6-2.7), similar for both DVT and PE.

    “In the trial, VTE risk was increased with HR of 2.06 (95% CI, 1.6–2.7), which was similar for both DVT and PE [102].”

    From Estrogen and thrombosis: a bench to bedside review (2020) · cites this paper as [102]

  • Other genetic mutations did not affect the risk of VTE.

    “Other genetic mutations did not affect the risk of VTE [102].”

    From Estrogen and thrombosis: a bench to bedside review (2020) · cites this paper as [102]

  • The WHI trial showed a 6-fold increase in VTE (HR 6.7, 95% CI 3.1-14.5) in women with factor V Leiden mutation who were on combined hormone therapy.

    “Furthermore, the trial showed a 6-fold increase in VTE (HR 6.7, 95% CI 3.1–14.5) in women with factor five leiden mutation (FVL) who were on CHC.”

    From Estrogen and thrombosis: a bench to bedside review (2020) · cites this paper as [102]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cushman, M.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Cushman, Mary
Venue
JAMA
Published
2004-10-06
Volume
292
Issue
13
Pages
1573
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2126595069
Cited by
632
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 29
FWCI
28.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Women's Health Initiative
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • Brown University
  • University of Miami
  • Wayne State University
  • Ohio State University
  • Emory University
  • Northwestern University
  • George Washington University
  • Wake Forest University
  • University of Minnesota
  • University of Washington
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • University of Cincinnati
  • University of Nevada, Reno
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
venous thrombosis, estrogen plus progestin, hormone replacement therapy, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, medroxyprogesterone acetate, conjugated equine estrogens, thrombosis risk factors, factor V Leiden, obesity, age, Women's Health Initiative, risk stratification, thromboprophylaxis
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Blood Coagulation Factors, Double-Blind Method, Estrogens, Conjugated (USP), Factor V, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Obesity, Risk, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Body Mass Index, Incidence, Proportional Hazards Models, Case-Control Studies, Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, Postmenopause, Venous Thrombosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review