The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association of mutations in mannose binding protein gene with childhood infection in consecutive hospital series
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To determine the extent to which mutations in the mannose binding protein gene predispose to childhood infection. Design: Clinical details and genotype of mannose binding protein determined in consecutive children attending a paediatric department. Setting: Inner city hospital paediatric service in London. Subjects: 617 children attending hospital between October 1993 and August 1995. Main outcome measure: Infection as the cause for attendance or admission in relation to mutations in the mannose binding protein gene. Results: The prevalence of mutations in the mannose binding protein gene in children with infection (146/345) was about twice that in children without infection (64/272) (P<0.0001). Increased susceptibility to infection was found in both heterozygotic and homozygotic children. 13 out of 17 children homozygotic for variant alleles presented with strikingly severe infections, including 6 with septicaemia. Conclusions: The findings suggest that mutations in the mannose binding protein gene are an important risk factor for infections in children. Screening for such mutations should be included in the investigation of severe or frequent infections. Key messages: Mutations in the mannose binding protein gene, which cause a common opsonic defect, are strongly associated with children presenting to hospital with infection The mutations increase susceptibility to infection in children who are heterozygotic or homozygotic for the mutations Children homozygotic for mannose binding protein gene mutations usually present with severe infections Investigation of severe or frequent infections should include screening for mannose binding protein gene mutations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trials
Yusuf, S., Peto, R., Lewis, J., Collins, R., & Sleight, P. (1985) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/s0033-0620(85)80003-7 · Cited by 3,205
An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment
Laupacis, A., Sackett, D. L., & Roberts, R. S. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198806303182605 · Cited by 1,681
Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials.
Simes, R. J. (1986) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1986.4.10.1529 · Cited by 747
Cited by
Complement and its role in innate and adaptive immune responses
Dunkelberger, J. R., & Song, W.-C. (2010) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2009.139 · Cited by 1,932
CISH and Susceptibility to Infectious Diseases
Khor, C. C., Vannberg, F. O., Chapman, S. J., Guo, H., Wong, S. H., Walley, A. J., Vukcevic, D., Rautanen, A., Mills, T. C., Chang, K.-C., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0905606 · Cited by 136
Genetic polymorphisms in sepsis
Dahmer, M. K., Randolph, A., Vitali, S., & Quasney, M. W. (2005) · Pediatric Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.pcc.0000161970.44470.c7 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Summerfield, J. A., Sumiya, M., Levin, M., & Turner, M. W.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1997-04-26
- Volume
- 314
- Issue
- 7089
- Pages
- 1229
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2070618971
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.