Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prospective cohort study of factors influencing the relative weights of the placenta and the newborn infant

Open access
Williams, Lucy A, Evans, Sharon F, Newnham, John P·1997·BMJ

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the demographic, environmental, and medical factors that influence the relative weights of the newborn infant and the placenta and compare this ratio with other factors known to predispose to adult ill health. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: The tertiary referral centre for perinatal care in Perth, Western Australia. Subjects: 2507 pregnant women who delivered a single live infant at term. Main outcome measures: Placental weight, birth weight, and the ratio of placental weight to birth weight. Results: By multiple regression analysis the placental weight to birthweight ratio was significantly and positively associated with gestational age, female sex, Asian parentage, increasing maternal body mass index, increased maternal weight at booking, lower socioeconomic status, maternal anaemia, and increasing number of cigarettes smoked daily. There were no consistent relations between the placental weight to birthweight ratio and measures of newborn size. Conclusions: The ratio of placental weight to birth weight is not an accurate marker of fetal growth. In its role as a predictor of adult disease the ratio may be acting as a surrogate for other factors which are already known to influence health and may act before or after birth. Determining the role that relative growth rates of the fetus and placenta have in predisposing to adult disease requires prospective study to account for the many confounding variables which complicate this hypothesis. Key messages: Retrospective analyses have identified an association between a raised placental weight to birthweight ratio and hypertension in adulthood Accurate estimation of gestational age is crucial when interpreting the placental weight to birthweight ratio Environmental factors associated with alterations in the placental weight to birthweight ratio may not exert their effects exclusively in the antenatal period As a marker of fetal growth the potential usefulness of the placental weight to birthweight ratio is diminished because the ratio is influenced by a multiplicity of factors Prospective study is required to clarify the role of intrauterine programming in the genesis of adult disease

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1864

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Williams, L. A., Evans, S. F., & Newnham, J. P.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1997-06-28
Volume
314
Issue
7098
Pages
1864
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1991250895
Cited by
185
References
3
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective cohort study of factors influencing the relative weights of the placenta and the newborn infant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1864
The paper
Williams, L. A., Evans, S. F., & Newnham, J. P. (1997). Prospective cohort study of factors influencing the relative weights of the placenta and the newborn infant. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1864

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.