The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of patients' hopes of receiving a prescription on doctors' perceptions and the decision to prescribe: a questionnaire survey
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: To measure patients' expectations of receiving prescriptions and general practitioners' perceptions of these expectations and to determine the factors most closely associated with the decision to prescribe. Design: Questionnaires were completed by patients waiting to see their general practitioners, and by their doctors immediately after the consultations. Setting: Four non-fundholding group practices in southeast London. Subjects: 544 unselected patients consulting 15 general practitioners. Main outcome measures: Doctors' perceptions of patients' expectations; doctors' decisions to prescribe. Results: 67% (354/526) of patients hoped for a prescription; doctors perceived that 56% (305/542) of patients wanted prescriptions; and doctors wrote prescriptions in 59% (321/543) of consultations. Despite the close agreement between patients' hopes and doctors' perceptions, 25% (89/353) of patients hoped for a prescription but did not receive one. In 22% (68/313) of consultations in which prescriptions were written, they were not strictly indicated on purely medical grounds, and in only 66% (202/306) of consultations in which prescriptions were written were they both indicated and hoped for. Doctors' perceptions of patients' expectations were the strongest predictor of the decision to prescribe, but the final regression model also included patients' hopes and ethnic group, and the doctor's feeling of being pressurised. Conclusions: In an area of low prescribing and high expectations the decision to prescribe was closely related to actual and perceived expectations, but the latter was the more significant influence. Key messages: Evidence that patients' expectations influence general practitioners' prescribing is equivocal; in this study patients' hopes of receiving a prescription exceeded both doctors' perceptions and the level of prescribing Over a quarter of patients who hoped for a prescription did not receive one In a fifth of consultations in which a prescription was written, the prescription was not strictly indicated on purely medical grounds Doctors' perceptions were the strongest determinant of the decision to prescribe Doctors who felt pressurised were less likely to write a prescription if they perceived that the patient wanted one, and if they did write a prescription, it was less likely to be indicated than when the doctor did not feel pressurised
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2006) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2006.s417 · Cited by 4,950
International Classification of Primary Care
Bentsen, B. G. (1986) · Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care · doi:10.3109/02813438609013970 · Cited by 898
Korsch, B. M., & Negrete, V. F. (1972) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0872-66 · Cited by 802
Cockburn, J., & Pit, S. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7107.520 · Cited by 523
Open randomised trial of prescribing strategies in managing sore throat
Little, P., Williamson, I., Warner, G., Gould, C., Gantley, M., & Kinmonth, A. L. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7082.722 · Cited by 364
Primary non-compliance with prescribed medication in primary care.
Beardon, P. H., McGilchrist, M. M., McKendrick, A. D., McDevitt, D. G., & MacDonald, T. M. (1993) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.307.6908.846 · Cited by 343
Multilevel Models: Applications to Health Data
Rice, N., & Leyland, A. (1996) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/135581969600100307 · Cited by 272
Webb, S. M., & Lloyd, M. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 166
Going to See the Doctor: The Consultation Process in General Practice
Budd, S., Stimson, G. V., & Webb, B. (1976) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/589570 · Cited by 158
Williams, S. J. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315072395 · Cited by 135
Cited by
Little, P., Everitt, H., Williamson, I., Warner, G., Moore, M., Gould, C., Ferrier, K., & Payne, S. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7318.908 · Cited by 906
Little, P., Everitt, H., Williamson, I., Warner, G., Moore, M., Gould, C., Ferrier, K., & Payne, S. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7284.468 · Cited by 766
Reducing Antibiotic Use in Children: A Randomized Trial in 12 Practices
Finkelstein, J. A., Davis, R. L., Dowell, S. F., Metlay, J. P., Soumerai, S. B., Rifas-Shiman, S. L., Higham, M., Miller, Z., Miroshnik, I., Pedan, A., et al. (2001) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.108.1.1 · Cited by 674
Doctor–patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making
Stevenson, F. A., Barry, C. A., Britten, N., Barber, N., & Bradley, C. P. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00376-7 · Cited by 434
Self-citationBowling, A., Rowe, G., Lambert, N., Waddington, M., Mahtani, K., Kenten, C., Howe, A., & Francis, S. (2012) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta16300 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Britten, N., & Ukoumunne, O.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1997-12-06
- Volume
- 315
- Issue
- 7121
- Pages
- 1506-1510
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2084155907
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 33.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The influence of patients' hopes of receiving a prescription on doctors' perceptions and the decision to prescribe: a questionnaire survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.315.7121.1506
- The paper
- Britten, N., & Ukoumunne, O. (1997). The influence of patients' hopes of receiving a prescription on doctors' perceptions and the decision to prescribe: a questionnaire survey. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7121.1506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.