The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Weighted comparison of means: Table 1
Open accessAbstract
In a recent Statistics Note1 we referred to a weighted two sample t test. Here we describe how it is done. The data were the percentage of requests from general practitioners for x ray examinations which were judged appropriate (table 1), where general practitioners had been randomised to intervention or control groups.2 View this table: Table 1 Number of requests conforming to guidelines for each practice in the intervention and control groups If we compare the two sets of percentages by the usual two sample t method, each observation (practice) has an equal impact on the result. As some practices contributed fewer requests than others, we wish these practices to have a lesser effect on the estimate of the difference. We can do this by weighting the practices by the …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of a trial randomised in clusters: Table 1
Kerry, S. M., & Bland, J. M. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7124.54 · Cited by 153
Cited by
Eggebrecht, H., Schmermund, A., Voigtländer, T., Kahlert, P., Erbel, R., & Mehta, R. H. (2012) · EuroIntervention · doi:10.4244/eijv8i1a20 · Cited by 406
Incidence of diagnosed deep vein thrombosis in the general population: Systematic review
Fowkes, F. J. I., Price, J. F., & Fowkes, F. G. R. (2003) · European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery · doi:10.1053/ejvs.2002.1778 · Cited by 383
How often do patients with psychosis fail to adhere to treatment programmes? A systematic review
NOSÉ, M., BARBUI, C., & TANSELLA, M. (2003) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291703008328 · Cited by 353
Marchesi, C., Pierfranceschi, M., Crowther, M., Garcia, D., Hylek, E., Witt, D., Clark, N., Squizzato, A., Imberti, D., Ageno, W., et al. (2011) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1160/th11-01-0052 · Cited by 306
Feldman, R. D., Zou, G. Y., Vandervoort, M. K., Wong, C. J., Nelson, S. A. E., & Feagan, B. G. (2009) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.108.123455 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Bland, J. M., & Kerry, S. M.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1998-01-10
- Volume
- 316
- Issue
- 7125
- Pages
- 129
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2077292419
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weighted comparison of means: Table 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.316.7125.129
- The paper
- Bland, J. M., & Kerry, S. M. (1998). Weighted comparison of means: Table 1. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7125.129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.