The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How often do patients with psychosis fail to adhere to treatment programmes? A systematic review
Abstract
Background. Studies that assess the rates of psychotic patients who fail to adhere to treatment programmes have generated heterogeneous results, with estimates ranging from 24 to 90%. This paper presents findings from a systematic review on adherence to treatment by patients with psychosis. Its purpose is to provide an overall estimate of treatment non-adherence in community psychiatric services, and to analyse and study patient characteristics explaining the between-study heterogeneity in rates of non-adherence. Method. A systematic review of published studies that report rates of non-adherence with medication and scheduled appointments by psychotic patients in community settings has been undertaken. Results. A total of 103 studies were included in this systematic review. Eighty-six of these studies were suitable for data re-analysis. The overall weighted mean rate of non-adherence, calculated in a sample of 23796 patients, was 25·78%. A linear regression analysis of non-adherence rates on background characteristics showed that sample size was negatively associated with non-adherence rates, while first-contact cases and low-adherence cases, in comparison with ongoing cases, were associated with higher non-adherence rates. Factors associated with poor compliance included: lack of insight; positive symptoms; younger age; male gender; history of substance abuse; unemployment; and low social functioning. Conclusions. Approximately one in four patients with psychosis fails to adhere with treatment programmes. Preventive evidence-based clinical interventions should be routinely implemented in community settings to reduce patient non-adherence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1986) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177013815 · Cited by 6,033
Lacro, J. P., Dunn, L. B., Dolder, C. R., Leckband, S. G., & Jeste, D. V. (2002) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.v63n1007 · Cited by 1,383 · cited 1×
“This finding was lower than figures quoted in other studies (Fenton et al. 1997; Cramer &Rosenheck, 1998; Kampaman & Lehtine, 1999; Oehl et al. 2000; Lacro et al. 2002).”
ResultRobinson, D., Woerner, M. G., Alvir, J. M. J., Bilder, R., Goldman, R., Geisler, S., Koreen, A., Sheitman, B., Chakos, M., Mayerhoff, D., et al. (1999) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.3.241 · Cited by 1,327
Determinants of Medication Compliance in Schizophrenia: Empirical and Clinical Findings
Fenton, W. S., Blyler, C. R., & Heinssen, R. K. (1997) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/23.4.637 · Cited by 957
Interventions for helping patients to follow prescriptions for medications
Haynes, R., McDonald, H., Garg, A., & Montague, P. (2002) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000011 · Cited by 911
Compliance With Medication Regimens for Mental and Physical Disorders
Cramer, J. A., & Rosenheck, R. (1998) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.49.2.196 · Cited by 725
Compliance with therapeutic regimens
Jay, S., Litt, I. F., & Durant, R. H. (1984) · Journal of Adolescent Health Care · doi:10.1016/s0197-0070(84)80012-1 · Cited by 666
Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence in Schizophrenia
Zygmunt, A., Olfson, M., Boyer, C. A., & Mechanic, D. (2002) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.10.1653 · Cited by 542
Weighted comparison of means: Table 1
Bland, J. M., & Kerry, S. M. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7125.129 · Cited by 211
Compliance with antipsychotic treatment
Oehl, M., Hummer, M., & Fleischhacker, W. W. (2000) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.00016.x · Cited by 151
Cited by
Clement, S., Schauman, O., Graham, T., Maggioni, F., Evans-Lacko, S., Bezborodovs, N., Morgan, C., Rüsch, N., Brown, J. S. L., & Thornicroft, G. (2015) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291714000129 · Cited by 3,152
Determinants of patient adherence: a review of systematic reviews
Kardas, P., Lewek, P., & Matyjaszczyk, M. (2013) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2013.00091 · Cited by 809
Kane, J. M., Kishimoto, T., & Correll, C. U. (2013) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20060 · Cited by 520
Kreyenbuhl, J., Nossel, I. R., & Dixon, L. B. (2009) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbp046 · Cited by 441
(2009) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.7090su1cj · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- NOSÉ, M., BARBUI, C., & TANSELLA, M.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-09-25
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1149-1160
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2040867604
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 8.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How often do patients with psychosis fail to adhere to treatment programmes? A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291703008328
- The paper
- NOSÉ, M., BARBUI, C., & TANSELLA, M. (2003). How often do patients with psychosis fail to adhere to treatment programmes? A systematic review. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291703008328
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.