Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 450

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in critically ill adult patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Open access
D'Amico, Roberto, Pifferi, Silvia, Leonetti, Cinzia, Torri, Valter, Tinazzi, Angelo, Liberati, Alessandro·1998·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether antibiotic prophylaxis reduces respiratory tract infections and overall mortality in unselected critically ill adult patients. Design: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials from 1984 and 1996 that compared different forms of antibiotic prophylaxis used to reduce respiratory tract infections and mortality with aggregate data and, in a subset of trials, data from individual patients. Subjects: Unselected critically ill adult patients; 5727 patients for aggregate data meta-analysis, 4343 for confirmatory meta-analysis with data from individual patients. Main outcome measures: Respiratory tract infections and total mortality. Results: Two categories of eligible trials were defined: topical plus systemic antibiotics versus no treatment and topical preparation with or without a systemic antibiotic versus a systemic agent or placebo. Estimates from aggregate data meta-analysis of 16 trials (3361 patients) that tested combined treatment indicated a strong significant reduction in infection (odds ratio 0.35; 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.41) and total mortality (0.80; 0.69 to 0.93). With this treatment five and 23 patients would need to be treated to prevent one infection and one death, respectively. Similar analysis of 17 trials (2366 patients) that tested only topical antibiotics indicated a clear reduction in infection (0.56; 0.46 to 0.68) without a significant effect on total mortality (1.01; 0.84 to 1.22). Analysis of data from individual patients yielded similar results. No significant differences in treatment effect by major subgroups of patients emerged from the analyses. Conclusions: This meta-analysis of 15 years of clinical research suggests that antibiotic prophylaxis with a combination of topical and systemic drugs can reduce respiratory tract infections and overall mortality in critically ill patients. This effect is significant and worth while, and it should be considered when practice guidelines are defined. Key messages: Over 40% of patients who need ventilation in intensive care develop respiratory tract infections and about 30% may die in the units If the most effective antibiotic prophylaxis (that is, a protocol combining topical and systemic antibiotics) is used the incidence of respiratory tract infections can be reduced by 65% and total mortality by 20% A regimen of topical antibiotics alone reduces respiratory tract infections but does not influence survival The concern that widespread antibiotic use may lead to resistance cannot be confirmed or ruled out by this review. Trials with different design are probably warranted to handle this question This important effect of antibiotic prophylaxis with a combination of topical and systemic antibiotics on survival should be considered by intensivists when treatment policies are designed

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.316.7140.1275

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. 10.1001/jama.1996.03530350048033 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90060-3 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1007/BF00259435 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91510-2 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 1993, Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of selective decontamination of the digestive tract, BMJ, 307, 525, 10.1136/bmj.307.6903.525 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1378/chest.105.4.1221 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1128/AAC.39.4.941 · DOI
  8. 10.1378/chest.105.4.1101 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bion, 1994, Selective decontamination of the digestive tract reduces gram-negative pulmonary colonization but not systemic endotoxemia in patients undergoing elective liver transplantation, Crit Care Med, 22, 40, 10.1097/00003246-199401000-00011 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/infdis/162.6.1393 · DOI
  11. Hunefeld, 1989, Klinische Studie zur selektiven Darmdekolonisation bei 204 langzeitbeatmeten abdominal und unfallchirurgischen Intensivpatienten, Anaesthesiologie und Reanimation, 14, 131
  12. Lipman J Klugman K Luyt D Kraus P Litmanovitch M Johnson D . Unique trial design shows SDD to decrease and alter colonization of upper respiratory tract in a multidisciplinary ICU [abstract]. Crit Care Med 1994;141. · doi:10.1097/00003246-199401000-00214
  13. 10.1097/00000658-199507000-00010 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Martinez-Pellus, 1993, Can selective digestive decontamination avoid the endotoxemia and cytokine activation promoted by cardiopulmonary bypass?, Crit Care Med, 2, 1684, 10.1097/00003246-199311000-00017 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0270-9139(93)90076-Y · DOI
  16. 10.1097/00000658-199702000-00005 · DOI
  17. Smith, 1993, Selective decontamination in pediatric liver transplants. Randomised prospective study, Transplantation, 55, 1306, 10.1097/00007890-199306000-00018 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90813-K · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s001340050314 · DOI
  20. 10.1378/chest.100.3.783 · DOI
  21. Blair, 1991, Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: a stratified, randomized, prospective study in a mixed intensive care unit, Surgery, 110, 303
  22. Cockerill, 1992, Prevention of infection in critically ill patients by selective decontamination of the digestive tract, Ann Intern Med, 117, 545, 10.7326/0003-4819-117-7-545 · DOI
  23. Jacobs, 1992, Effectiveness of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) in an ICU with a policy encouraging a low gastric pH, Clin Intensive Med, 3, 52
  24. Kerver, 1988, Prevention of colonization and infection in critically ill patients: A prospective randomized study, Crit Care Med, 16, 1087, 10.1097/00003246-198811000-00001 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1080/714029035 · doi:10.1080/714029035
  26. 10.1007/BF01694341 · DOI
  27. Stoutenbeek CP van Saene HKF Little RA Whitehead A . The effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on mortality in multiple trauma patients. Ann Surg in press.
  28. Ulrich, 1989, Selective decontamination of the digestive tract with norfloxacin in the prevention of ICU-acquired infections: a prospective randomized study, Intensive Care Med, 15, 424, 10.1007/BF00255597 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1097/00003246-199701000-00014 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1093/jac/30.1.73 · DOI
  31. Brun-Buisson, 1989, Intestinal decontamination for control of nosocomial multiresistant gram-negative bacilli, Ann Intern Med, 110, 873, 10.7326/0003-4819-110-11-873 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420020045007 · DOI
  33. 10.1056/NEJM199202273260903 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Georges, 1994, Décontamination digestive sélective résultats d'une étude chez le polytraumatisé, Réanimation Soins Intensifs Médecin d'Urgence, 3, 621, 10.1016/S1164-6756(05)80459-1 · DOI
  35. Korinek, 1993, Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in neurosurgical care units patients: a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, Crit Care Med, 21, 1466, 10.1097/00003246-199310000-00013 · DOI
  36. 10.1001/jama.1991.03460200084041 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1378/chest.109.3.765 · DOI
  38. Rodriguez-Roldan, 1990, Prevention of nosocomial lung infection in ventilated patients: use of an antimicrobial pharyngeal nonabsorbable paste, Crit Care Med, 18, 1239, 10.1097/00003246-199011000-00011 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Unertl, 1987, Prevention of colonization and respiratory infections in long term ventilated patients by local antimicrobial prophylaxis, Intensive Care Med, 13, 106, 10.1007/BF00254795 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1093/clinids/20.4.861 · DOI
  41. Ferrer, 1994, Utility of selective digestive decontamination in mechanically ventilated patients, Ann Intern Med, 120, 389, 10.7326/0003-4819-120-5-199403010-00006 · DOI
  42. Gaussorgues, 1991, Efficacité de la décontamination digestive sur la survenue des bactériémies nosocomiales chez les patients sous ventilation méchanique et recevant des betamimétiques, Réanimation Soins Intensifs Médecin d'Urgence, 7, 169
  43. 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92422-C · DOI · Paper page
  44. Laggner, 1994, Oropharyngeal decontamination with gentamicin for long-term ventilated patients on stress ulcer prophylaxis with sucralfate?, Wien Klin Wochenschr, 106, 15
  45. Lingnau, 1997, Selective intestinal decontamination in multiple trauma patients: prospective, controlled trial, J Trauma, 42, 687, 10.1097/00005373-199704000-00018 · DOI
  46. Brazzi, 1992, A review of design and conduct of the available studies on selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD), Réanimation Soins Intensifs Médecin d'Urgence, 1, 501, 10.1016/S1164-6756(05)80325-1 · DOI
  47. 1983, Conversione tra APACHE II e SAPS, Minerva Anestesiol, 59, 451
  48. 10.1097/00003246-198608000-00028 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.2307/30147436 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1164/ajrccm.153.5.8630626 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Parmar, 1996, Meta-analysis of randomized trials: when the whole is more than just the sums of the parts, Br J Cancer, 74, 496, 10.1038/bjc.1996.392 · DOI
  52. Liberati A D'Amico R Pifferi S Leonetti C Torri V Brazzi L . Antibiotic prophylaxis in adult patients treated in intensive care units. In: Douglas R Bridges-Webb C Glasziou P Lozano J Steinhoff M Wang E , eds. Acute respiratory infections module, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The Cochrane Library. Cochrane Collaboration; Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software; 1997. Updated quarterly.
  53. Nathens AB . Differential effect of decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) on mortality in the surgical and medical ICU [abstract]. Shock 1997;suppl 7:697A. · doi:10.1097/00024382-199703001-00710
  54. 10.1097/00003246-199605000-00005 · DOI
  55. 10.1136/emj.13.6.373 · DOI
  56. 10.1093/jnlids/176.5.1293 · doi:10.1093/jnlids/176.5.1293
  57. Van Saene, 1996, Reduction of the intestinal endotoxin pool by three different SDD regimens in human volunteers, J Endotoxin Res, 3, 337, 10.1177/096805199600300408 · DOI
  58. 10.1097/00005373-199706000-00015 · DOI

Cited by

See all 450

Metadata

Authors
D'Amico, R., Pifferi, S., Leonetti, C., Torri, V., Tinazzi, A., & Liberati, A.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1998-04-25
Volume
316
Issue
7140
Pages
1275.1-1285
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2035281372
Cited by
450
References
1
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in critically ill adult patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.316.7140.1275
The paper
D'Amico, R., Pifferi, S., Leonetti, C., Torri, V., Tinazzi, A., & Liberati, A. (1998). Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in critically ill adult patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7140.1275

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.