The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using fetal nuchal translucency to screen for major congenital cardiac defects at 10-14 weeks of gestation: population based cohort study
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: To examine the utility of measuring fetal nuchal translucency thickness in screening for major defects of the heart and great arteries at 10-14 weeks of gestation. Design: Population based cohort study. Subjects: 29 154 singleton pregnancies with chromosomally normal fetuses at 10-14 weeks of gestation. Setting: Fetal medicine centre in London. Main outcome measure: Prevalence of major defects of the heart and great arteries. Results: Of 50 cases with major defects of the heart and great arteries (prevalence 1.7 per 1000 pregnancies) 28 (56%, 95% confidence interval 42% to 70%) were in the subgroup of 1822 pregnancies with fetal nuchal translucency thicknesses above the 95th centile of the normal range. The positive and negative predictive values for this cut off point of nuchal translucency thickness were 1.5% and 99.9% respectively. Conclusions: Measurement of fetal nuchal translucency thickness—traditionally used to identify fetuses at high risk of aneuploidy—at 10-14 weeks of gestation can identify a large proportion of fetuses with major defects of the heart and great arteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Snijders, R., Noble, P., Sebire, N., Souka, A., & Nicolaides, K. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11280-6 · Cited by 1,572
Incidence of congenital heart disease: I. Postnatal incidence
Hoffman, J. I. E. (1995) · Pediatric Cardiology · doi:10.1007/bf00801907 · Cited by 786
Cited by
2018 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy
Regitz-Zagrosek, V., Roos-Hesselink, J. W., Bauersachs, J., Blomström-Lundqvist, C., Cífková, R., De Bonis, M., Iung, B., Johnson, M. R., Kintscher, U., Kranke, P., et al. (2018) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy340 · Cited by 2,292
ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy
Endorsed by the European Society of Gynecology (ESG), T. A. F. E. P. C. (., Authors/Task Force Members, Regitz-Zagrosek, V., Blomstrom Lundqvist, C., Borghi, C., Cifkova, R., Ferreira, R., Foidart, J.-M., Gibbs, J. S. R., Gohlke-Baerwolf, C., et al. (2011) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr218 · Cited by 1,924
Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406
Donofrio, M. T., Moon-Grady, A. J., Hornberger, L. K., Copel, J. A., Sklansky, M. S., Abuhamad, A., Cuneo, B. F., Huhta, J. C., Jonas, R. A., Krishnan, A., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000437597.44550.5d · Cited by 1,275
Nuchal translucency and other first-trimester sonographic markers of chromosomal abnormalities
Nicolaides, K. H. (2004) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.090 · Cited by 626
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hyett, J., Perdu, M., Sharland, G., Snijders, R., & Nicolaides, K. H.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1999-01-09
- Volume
- 318
- Issue
- 7176
- Pages
- 81.1-85
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2166621803
- Cited by
- 611
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 40.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using fetal nuchal translucency to screen for major congenital cardiac defects at 10-14 weeks of gestation: population based cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.318.7176.81
- The paper
- Hyett, J., Perdu, M., Sharland, G., Snijders, R., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1999). Using fetal nuchal translucency to screen for major congenital cardiac defects at 10-14 weeks of gestation: population based cohort study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7176.81
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
