Cited by 83Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Assessment of competence to complete advance directives: validation of a patient centred approach

Open access
Fazel, S., Hope, T., Jacoby, R.·1999·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a patient centred approach for the assessment of competence to complete advance directives ("living wills") of elderly people with cognitive impairment. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews. SETTING: Oxfordshire. SUBJECTS: 50 elderly volunteers living in the community, and 50 patients with dementia on first referral from primary care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychometric properties of competence assessment. RESULTS: This patient centred approach for assessing competence to complete advance directives can discriminate between elderly persons living in the community and elderly patients with dementia. The procedure has good interrater (r=0.95) and test-retest (r=0.97) reliability. Validity was examined by relating this approach with a global assessment of competence to complete an advance directive made by two of us (both specialising in old age psychiatry). The data were also used to determine the best threshold score for discriminating between those competent and those incompetent to complete an advance directive. CONCLUSION: A patient centred approach to assess competence to complete advance directives can be reliably and validly used in routine clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.318.7182.493

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The research literature shows consistently that persons even in early stages of dementia are, based on a functional model of capacity, very often or usually incompetent to consent to treatment, to research, or to write an advance treatment directive.

    “the research literature that shows consistently that persons even in early stages of dementia are, based on a functional model of capacity, very often or usually incompetent to consent to treatment,(30) to research, (31) or to write an advance treatment directive.(32)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fazel, S., Hope, T., & Jacoby, R.
Affiliations
Warneford Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Fazel, S.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1999-02-20
Volume
318
Issue
7182
Pages
493-497
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1968943466
Cited by
83
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
advance directives, living wills, competency assessment, dementia, cognitive impairment, older adults, psychometric validation, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, threshold scores, end-of-life decisions
MeSH terms
Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Living Wills, Mental Competency, Patient-Centered Care, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review