Cited by 56Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealthcare Systems and TechnologyPsychiatric care and mental health services

Systematic review of the effect of on-site mental health professionals on the clinical behaviour of general practitioners

Open access
Bower, P.·2000·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review the published literature concerning the effects of on-site mental health professionals on general practitioners' management of mental health. DESIGN: Systematic review of controlled trials. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: General practitioners and mental health professionals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Consultation rates, prescribing of psychotropics, and referrals to secondary care mental health services by general practitioners. RESULTS: The effect of on-site mental health professionals on consultation rates was inconsistent. Referral to a mental health professional reduced the likelihood of a patient receiving a prescription for psychotropics or being referred to secondary care, although the effects were not consistent. An on-site mental health professional did not alter prescribing and referral behaviour towards patients in the wider practice population. CONCLUSIONS: The secondary effects of mental health professionals on the clinical behaviour of general practitioners are comparatively modest and inconsistent and seem to be restricted to patients directly under the care of the mental health professional.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.320.7235.614

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bower P, Sibbald B. The effect of on-site mental health workers on primary care providers' clinical behaviour (protocol). In: Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Library. Issue 4. Oxford: Update Software, 1998.
  2. Pharoah P. Do counsellors in general practice change the prescribing of hypnotics and anxiolytics? Primary Care Psychiatry 1996;1:263-4.
  3. Tarrier N, Woof K. Psychologists in primary care and their effects on GP referrals to psychiatry. Br J Clin Soc Psychiatry 1983;2:85-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bower, P.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Bower, P.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2000-03-04
Volume
320
Issue
7235
Pages
614-617
ISSN
0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027526049
Cited by
56
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
general practitioners, primary care mental health services, psychotropic prescribing, secondary care referral, consultation rates, clinical behavior
MeSH terms
Community Mental Health Services, Health Personnel, Humans, Physicians, Family, Professional Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review