Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 518

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anaesthesiology as a model for patient safety in health care

Open access
Gaba, D. M·2000·BMJ

Abstract

Although anaesthesiologists make up only about 5% of physicians in the United States, anaesthesiology is acknowledged as the leading medical specialty in addressing issues of patient safety.1 Why is this so? Firstly, as anaesthesia care became more complex and technological and expanded to include intensive care it attracted a higher calibre of staff. Clinicians working in anaesthesiology tend to be risk averse and interested in patient safety because anaesthesia can be dangerous but has no therapeutic benefit of its own. Anaesthesiology also attracted individuals with backgrounds in engineering to work either as clinicians or biomedical engineers involved in operating room activities. They and others found models for safety in anaesthesia in other hazardous technological pursuits, including aviation. 2 3 Secondly, in the 1970s and ‘80s the cost of malpractice insurance for anaesthesiologists in the United States soared and was at risk of becoming unavailable. The malpractice crisis galvanised the profession at all levels, including grass roots clinicians, to address seriously issues of patient safety. Thirdly, and perhaps most crucially, strong leaders emerged who were willing to admit that patient safety was imperfect and that, like any other medical problem, patient safety could be studied and interventions planned to achieve better outcomes. #### Summary points Anaesthesiology is acknowledged as the leading medical specialty in addressing patient safety Anaesthesia is safer than ever owing to many different types of solutions to safety problems Solution strategies have included incorporating new technologies, standards, and guidelines, and addressing problems relating to human factors and systems issues The multidisciplinary Anesthesia Safety Foundation was a key vehicle for promoting patient safety A crucial step was institutionalising patient safety as a topic of professional concern Although anaesthesiology has made important strides in improving patient safety, there is still a long way to go ### Anaesthesia: safer than ever It is widely believed that anaesthesia is …

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.785

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 518

Metadata

Authors
Gaba, D. M.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2000-03-18
Volume
320
Issue
7237
Pages
785-788
ISSN
0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086497856
Cited by
518
References
0
FWCI
17.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anaesthesiology as a model for patient safety in health care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.785
The paper
Gaba, D. M. (2000). Anaesthesiology as a model for patient safety in health care. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.785

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.