The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anaesthesiology as a model for patient safety in health care
Open accessAbstract
Although anaesthesiologists make up only about 5% of physicians in the United States, anaesthesiology is acknowledged as the leading medical specialty in addressing issues of patient safety.1 Why is this so? Firstly, as anaesthesia care became more complex and technological and expanded to include intensive care it attracted a higher calibre of staff. Clinicians working in anaesthesiology tend to be risk averse and interested in patient safety because anaesthesia can be dangerous but has no therapeutic benefit of its own. Anaesthesiology also attracted individuals with backgrounds in engineering to work either as clinicians or biomedical engineers involved in operating room activities. They and others found models for safety in anaesthesia in other hazardous technological pursuits, including aviation. 2 3 Secondly, in the 1970s and ‘80s the cost of malpractice insurance for anaesthesiologists in the United States soared and was at risk of becoming unavailable. The malpractice crisis galvanised the profession at all levels, including grass roots clinicians, to address seriously issues of patient safety. Thirdly, and perhaps most crucially, strong leaders emerged who were willing to admit that patient safety was imperfect and that, like any other medical problem, patient safety could be studied and interventions planned to achieve better outcomes. #### Summary points Anaesthesiology is acknowledged as the leading medical specialty in addressing patient safety Anaesthesia is safer than ever owing to many different types of solutions to safety problems Solution strategies have included incorporating new technologies, standards, and guidelines, and addressing problems relating to human factors and systems issues The multidisciplinary Anesthesia Safety Foundation was a key vehicle for promoting patient safety A crucial step was institutionalising patient safety as a topic of professional concern Although anaesthesiology has made important strides in improving patient safety, there is still a long way to go ### Anaesthesia: safer than ever It is widely believed that anaesthesia is …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model
Carayon, P., Schoofs Hundt, A., Karsh, B.-T., Gurses, A. P., Alvarado, C. J., Smith, M., & Flatley Brennan, P. (2006) · Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.015842 · Cited by 1,795
The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions
Bradley, P. (2006) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02394.x · Cited by 1,046
The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective
Swing, S. R. (2007) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590701392903 · Cited by 962
Electroencephalogram signatures of loss and recovery of consciousness from propofol
Purdon, P. L., Pierce, E. T., Mukamel, E. A., Prerau, M. J., Walsh, J. L., Wong, K. F. K., Salazar-Gomez, A. F., Harrell, P. G., Sampson, A. L., Cimenser, A., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1221180110 · Cited by 854
Bainbridge, D., Martin, J., Arango, M., & Cheng, D. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60990-8 · Cited by 600
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaba, D. M.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-03-18
- Volume
- 320
- Issue
- 7237
- Pages
- 785-788
- ISSN
- 0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086497856
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anaesthesiology as a model for patient safety in health care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.785
- The paper
- Gaba, D. M. (2000). Anaesthesiology as a model for patient safety in health care. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.785
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.