The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent advances: Recent advances in rehabilitation
Open accessAbstract
In Western countries 13-14% of the population have some degree of disability.1 The demand for rehabilitation services will increase as evidence accrues for their effectiveness and as more people survive longer with substantial disability. Current evidence strongly supports the provision of well organised, coordinated, multidisciplinary rehabilitation services based on a problem oriented approach.2 In future, specific interventions will be more evidence based, leading to more appropriate use of interventions and more appropriate referrals to specialist services. Rehabilitation has recently seen many practical innovations and new evidence for specific interventions, but the major advances in rehabilitation are conceptual rather than practical. Firstly, the approach to patients has moved from a predominantly medical one to one in which psychological and sociocultural aspects are equally important. Secondly, the need for organised specialist rehabilitation services—for example, for neurological disabilities—is being recognised. This review concentrates on the conceptual basis of rehabilitation and some emerging principles; the scope of rehabilitation is too large to cover all major advances. We chose topics and papers on the basis of our experience. Models of illness are important.3 4 They form the basis for all decisions on the allocation of resources. They can help in the analysis and understanding of clinical cases and can form a framework for the research and planning of intervention, the construction of services, and the design of research. For effective disability services, doctors, healthcare professionals, politicians, and the general public need to understand the models. The international classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps (ICIDH) was developed under the auspices of the World Health Organization and was first published in 1980.5 The development of this classification model and its worldwide acceptance is arguably the greatest single advance in the field of rehabilitation. There are many other models of disability and illness,3 …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Barthel ADL Index: A reliability study
Collin, C., Wade, D. T., Davies, S., & Horne, V. (1988) · International Disability Studies · doi:10.3109/09638288809164103 · Cited by 2,734
Self-citationMeasurement in Neurological Rehabilitation
Cole, M. (1993) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.43.2.459-b · Cited by 1,011
Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial
Kwakkel, G., Wagenaar, R. C., Twisk, J. W., Lankhorst, G. J., & Koetsier, J. C. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)09477-x · Cited by 938
Merkies, I. S. J., & Kieseier, B. C. (2016) · European Neurology · doi:10.1159/000445347 · Cited by 869
Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study.
Collin, C., & Wade, D. (1990) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.53.7.576 · Cited by 825
Self-citationVisintin, M., Barbeau, H., Korner-Bitensky, N., & Mayo, N. E. (1998) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.29.6.1122 · Cited by 688
Langhorne, Berman, P. H., Blomstrand, C., Dennis, M., Douglas, J. A., Erilä, T., Garraway, M. O., Hamrin, E., Hankey, G. J., Ilmavirta, M., et al. (1997) · PubMed Central · Cited by 655
Effects of Intensity of Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Research Synthesis
Kwakkel, G., Wagenaar, R. C., Koelman, T. W., Lankhorst, G. J., & Koetsier, J. C. (1997) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.28.8.1550 · Cited by 589
Wood, P. H. N. (1990) · Health Systems Research · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75593-4_7 · Cited by 514
Social work with disabled people
(2017) · The short guide to social work · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1t890kh.14 · Cited by 500
Cited by
The biopsychosocial model of illness: a model whose time has come
Wade, D. T., & Halligan, P. W. (2017) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215517709890 · Cited by 787
Self-citationValidity of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation
Post, M. W. M., van der Zee, C. H., Hennink, J., Schafrat, C. G., Visser-Meily, J. M. A., & van Berlekom, S. B. (2012) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2011.608148 · Cited by 268
The effects and experiences of goal setting in stroke rehabilitation – a systematic review
Sugavanam, T., Mead, G., Bulley, C., Donaghy, M., & van Wijck, F. (2013) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.690501 · Cited by 226
Plant, S. E., Tyson, S. F., Kirk, S., & Parsons, J. (2016) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215516655856 · Cited by 202
Ehrenborg, C., & Archenholtz, B. (2010) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215510362325 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Wade, D. T.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-05-20
- Volume
- 320
- Issue
- 7246
- Pages
- 1385-1388
- ISSN
- 0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1503945529
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 43.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent advances: Recent advances in rehabilitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1385
- The paper
- Wade, D. T. (2000). Recent advances: Recent advances in rehabilitation. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.