The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association between psychosocial work characteristics and health functioning in American women: prospective study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine prospectively the relation between psychosocial work characteristics and changes in health related quality of life over four years in a cohort of working women in the United States. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: 21 290 female registered nurses who completed the Karasek's job content questionnaire and a modified version of the short form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) as used for a survey of health status by the medical outcomes study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Seven dimensions of health status: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. RESULTS: Examined separately low job control, high job demands, and low work related social support were associated with poor health status at baseline as well as greater functional declines over the four year follow up period. Examined in combination, women with low job control, high job demands, and low work related social support ("iso-strain" jobs) had the greatest functional declines. These associations could not be explained by age, body mass index, comorbid disease status, alcohol consumption, smoking status, education level, exercise level, employment status, marital status, or presence of a confidant. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse psychosocial work conditions are important predictors of poor functional status and its decline over time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marmot, M., Bosma, H., Hemingway, H., Brunner, E., & Stansfeld, S. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)04244-x · Cited by 1,291
Zapf, D., Dormann, C., & Frese, M. (1996) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.1.2.145 · Cited by 1,174
Psychologic Stress in the Workplace and Spontaneous Abortion
Fenster, L., Schaefer, C., Mathur, A., Hiatt, R. A., Pieper, C., Hubbard, A. E., Von Behren, J., & Swan, S. H. (1995) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117576 · Cited by 118
Cited by
Psychosocial work environment and mental health—a meta-analytic review
Stansfeld, S., & Candy, B. (2006) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.1050 · Cited by 1,875
The Effects of Stress on Physical Activity and Exercise
Stults-Kolehmainen, M. A., & Sinha, R. (2014) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0090-5 · Cited by 1,192
The Relation between Work-related Psychosocial Factors and the Development of Depression
Netterstrom, B., Conrad, N., Bech, P., Fink, P., Olsen, O., Rugulies, R., & Stansfeld, S. (2008) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/epirev/mxn004 · Cited by 467
Literature review of role stress/strain on nurses: An international perspective
Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. (2001) · Nursing & Health Sciences · doi:10.1046/j.1442-2018.2001.00086.x · Cited by 227
Work related stress, burnout, job satisfaction and general health of nurses: A follow‐up study
Khamisa, N., Peltzer, K., Ilic, D., & Oldenburg, B. (2016) · International Journal of Nursing Practice · doi:10.1111/ijn.12455 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, Y.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-05-27
- Volume
- 320
- Issue
- 7247
- Pages
- 1432-1436
- ISSN
- 0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095830467
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 35.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association between psychosocial work characteristics and health functioning in American women: prospective study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.320.7247.1432
- The paper
- Cheng, Y. (2000). Association between psychosocial work characteristics and health functioning in American women: prospective study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7247.1432
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.