The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethnography and health care
Open accessAbstract
Aims Our work demonstrates that after both rape and consensual sexual intercourse, women with light skin have higher ano-genital injury prevalence than women with dark skin. These findings suggest that the mechanical properties of dark skin may be more protective than those of light skin. If these findings are generalisable, they may have an impact on criminal justice proceedings, where injury from rapes is linked with successful legal outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are differences in skin elasticity between females with dark skin, as compared to those with light skin. Methods We enrolled 52 healthy female participants ≤18 years (M=30.8; SD=12.3), with a variety of ethnic backgrounds in a cross-sectional descriptive study, we measured skin colour (L*=light/dark; a*=red/green; b*=yellow/blue) by means of spectrophotometry. We measured skin elasticity variables (eg, skin deformation, elasticity and recovery) with a Cutometer MPA580. Results Skin colour L* values ranged from 796.96–7 229.33 (M=6238.96; SD=1116). While the correlation between skin colour and skin elasticity was insignificant (r=0.14), a statistically significant inverse relationship was found between age and skin elasticity (r2=−0.62, p<.0001). Conclusions The strong inverse relationship of age and skin elasticity indicates an increased risk of skin injury as women age. This data did not support the theory that skin elasticity is associated with colour. Study limitations include a disproportionate number of participants ≤25 years, with light skin, and self-identifying as White/Caucasian. Future work will include a larger sample, with greater parity across ages, race/ethnicities, and skin colours.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Jehlen, M., & Said, E. W. (1994) · The William and Mary Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2946944 · Cited by 6,527
(2017) · The SHAFR Guide Online · doi:10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim270040011 · Cited by 5,395
Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research
Mays, N. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50 · Cited by 3,742
Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences
Laitin, D. D., Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1987) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1386453 · Cited by 3,658
Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative research
Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109 · Cited by 2,715
Pope, C., & Mays, N. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6996.42 · Cited by 2,336
Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods.
Russell, C. K., & Morse, J. M. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076454 · Cited by 2,229
Nursing research : the application of qualitative approaches
Morse, J. M., & Field, P. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,475
Thomas, J. (1993) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412983945 · Cited by 1,260
Cited by
Qualitative and Mixed Methods Provide Unique Contributions to Outcomes Research
Curry, L. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.742775 · Cited by 1,085
Living with severe aphasia: Tracking social exclusion
Parr, S. (2007) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687030600798337 · Cited by 344
Naslund, J. A., Grande, S. W., Aschbrenner, K. A., & Elwyn, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110171 · Cited by 331
Assessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: ethnographic study
Fudge, N., Wolfe, C. D. A., & McKevitt, C. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39456.552257.be · Cited by 200
Halpern, J., Gurevich, M., Schwartz, B., & Brazeau, P. (2009) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678370903057317 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Savage, J.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-12-02
- Volume
- 321
- Issue
- 7273
- Pages
- 1400-1402
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2043284725
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 17.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethnography and health care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.321.7273.1400
- The paper
- Savage, J. (2000). Ethnography and health care. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7273.1400
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.