The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: selective review of the cognitive literature
Open accessAbstract
can be expertly administered.18 Ideally, as many patients as possible would be treated within 90 or 120 minutes of onset, when benefit is maximal.The time has come for proponents of thrombolysis and reformed thrombolytic contrarians to join together to improve systems of acute stroke care worldwide so that more properly evaluated, properly selected, and properly informed stroke patients can be treated with intravenous thrombolytics within three hours of onset.JLS, CSK, and SS have served as site investigators in acute stroke clinical trials sponsored by several (15, 11, and 17 respectively) pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, including Genentech and Boehringer-Ingelheim; have received speaking honorariums from several (12, 5, 8) pharmaceutical companies, including Genentech and Boehringer-Ingelheim; and have served as consultants on scientific advisory boards for several (7, 1, 5) pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies developing acute stroke treaments, including Boehringer-Ingelheim and Genentech.1 NINDS rt-PA Stroke Group.Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke
(1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199512143332401 · Cited by 11,654
(1975) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197507312930513 · Cited by 1,017
Cited by
Ericsson, K. A. (2004) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022 · Cited by 2,988
Educational Strategies to Promote Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning
Bowen, J. L. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra054782 · Cited by 931
Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims
Gandhi, T. K., Kachalia, A., Thomas, E. J., Puopolo, A. L., Yoon, C., Brennan, T. A., & Studdert, D. M. (2006) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-145-7-200610030-00006 · Cited by 662
Bennett, C. C., & Hauser, K. (2013) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2012.12.003 · Cited by 378
“Partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) extend MDPs by maintaining internal belief states about patient status, treatment effect, etc., similar to the cognitive planning aspects in a human clinician [22,23].”
Burgess, D. J. (2010) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x09341751 · Cited by 213
Metadata
- Authors
- Elstein, A. S., & Schwarz, A.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-03-23
- Volume
- 324
- Issue
- 7339
- Pages
- 729-732
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1582530249
- Cited by
- 717
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: selective review of the cognitive literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.324.7339.729
- The paper
- Elstein, A. S., & Schwarz, A. (2002). Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: selective review of the cognitive literature. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7339.729
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
