Cited by 226Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyUrological Disorders and Treatments

Problems with sexual function in people attending London general practitioners: cross sectional study

Open access
Nazareth, Irwin, Boynton, Petra, King, Michael·2003·BMJ

Abstract

Objectives To assess sexual behaviour, prevalence of ICD-10 diagnosed sexual dysfunction, associations between sexual and psychological problems, and help seeking for sexual problems in people attending general practice; to assess predictors of ICD-10 diagnosis of sexual dysfunction. Design Cross sectional study. Setting 13 general practices in London. Participants 1065 women and 447 men attending general practices. Main outcome measure Prevalence and predictors of ICD-10 diagnoses of sexual dysfunction. Results 97 (22%, 95% confidence interval 18% to 25%) men and 422 (40%, 37% to 43%) women received at least one ICD-10 diagnosis, but only 3-4% had an entry relating to sexual problems in their general practice notes. The most common problems were erectile failure and lack or loss of sexual desire in men and lack or loss of sexual desire and failure of orgasmic response in women. Increasing age and being unemployed predicted sexual problems in women, and bisexual orientation, being non-white, and being unemployed were demographic predictors in men. No practice note factors predicted sexual problems in women, but high consulting rate predicted problems in men. The main clinical predictors were poor physical function and dissatisfaction with current sex life in both sexes and higher psychological morbidity in women. When all factors were considered, increasing age (odds ratio 1.01, 1.00 to 1.02), physical subscale score on the SF-12 (0.98, 0.97 to 0.99), sexual dissatisfaction (1.9, 1.5 to 2.4), and scoring over a 3/4 threshold score on the general health questionnaire (1.5, 1.1 to 1.9)independently predicted an ICD-10 sexual dysfunction diagnosis in women. Being bisexual (4.1, 1.3 to 12.8) was the only independent predictor of an ICD-10 diagnosis in men. Conclusions Sexual difficulties are common in people attending general practitioners, and many people are prepared to talk about them with their doctors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.327.7412.423

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Taylor JF, Rosen RC, Leiblum SR. Self report assessment of female sexual function. Arch Sex Behav 1994;23:627-43.
  2. Mercer CH, Fenton KA, Johnson AM, Wellings K, Macdowell W, McManus S, et al. Self reported sexual function problems and help seek- ing behaviour: results from a British probability sample survey. BMJ 2003 (in press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nazareth, I., Boynton, P., & King, M.
Affiliations
The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Nazareth, Irwin
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-08-21
Volume
327
Issue
7412
Pages
423
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2156926268
Cited by
226
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
sexual dysfunction, sexual behavior, erectile dysfunction, loss of sexual desire, orgasmic dysfunction, help-seeking, general practice, ICD-10 diagnoses, sexual dissatisfaction, psychological morbidity, predictors of sexual dysfunction, age, unemployment, physical function
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Family Practice, Female, Humans, London, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Prevalence, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review