Cited by 846Innovations in Medical EducationDiversity and Career in MedicineHealth and Medical Education

The hidden curriculum in undergraduate medical education: qualitative study of medical students' perceptions of teaching

Open access
Lempp, Heidi, Seale, Clive·2004·BMJ

Abstract

Objective To study medical students' views about the quality of the teaching they receive during their undergraduate training, especially in terms of the hidden curriculum. Design Semistructured interviews with individual students. Setting One medical school in the United Kingdom. Participants 36 undergraduate medical students, across all stages of their training, selected by random and quota sampling, stratified by sex and ethnicity, with the whole medical school population as a sampling frame. Main outcome measures Medical students' experiences and perceptions of the quality of teaching received during their undergraduate training. Results Students reported many examples of positive role models and effective, approachable teachers, with valued characteristics perceived according to traditional gendered stereotypes. They also described a hierarchical and competitive atmosphere in the medical school, in which haphazard instruction and teaching by humiliation occur, especially during the clinical training years. Conclusions Following on from the recent reforms of the manifest curriculum, the hidden curriculum now needs attention to produce the necessary fundamental changes in the culture of undergraduate medical education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.329.7469.770

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consideration of power imbalances between participants and researcher is especially important when researching medical students and doctors, who already may be operating within a hierarchical structure.

    “Like all research, there must be consideration of power imbalances between the participants and researcher, and this is especially important when researching medical students and doctors, who already may be operating within a hierarchical structure.46,49”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hafferty FW. Reconfiguring the sociology of medical education: emerging topics and pressing issues. In: Bird F, Conrad P, Fremont AM, eds. Handbook of medical sociology, 5th ed. New York: Prentice Hall, 2000:238-56.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lempp, H., & Seale, C.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Lempp, Heidi
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2004-09-30
Volume
329
Issue
7469
Pages
770-773
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2089969749
Cited by
846
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 35
FWCI
17.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
hidden curriculum, undergraduate medical education, medical students' perceptions, teaching quality, role models, gender stereotypes, clinical teaching, medical school culture
MeSH terms
Attitude, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Female, Humans, London, Male, Perception, Students, Medical, Teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review