Cited by 463Psychiatric care and mental health servicesHistorical Psychiatry and Medical PracticesHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints

Reinstitutionalisation in mental health care: comparison of data on service provision from six European countries.

Open access
Priebe, Stefan, Badesconyi, Alli, Fioritti, Angelo, Hansson, Lars, Kilian, Reinhold, Torres-Gonzales, Francisco, Turner, Trevor, Wiersma, Durk·2005·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish whether reinstitutionalisation is occurring in mental health care and, if so, with what variations between western European countries. DESIGN: Comparison of data on changes in service provision. SETTING: Six European countries with different traditions of mental health care that have all experienced deinstitutionalisation since the 1970s--England, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and Sweden. OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in the number of forensic hospital beds, involuntary hospital admissions, places in supported housing, general psychiatric hospital beds, and general prison population between 1990-1 and 2002-3. RESULTS: Forensic beds and places in supported housing have increased in all countries, whereas changes in involuntary hospital admissions have been inconsistent. The number of psychiatric hospital beds has been reduced in five countries, but only in two countries does this reduction outweigh the number of additional places in forensic institutions and supported housing. The general prison population has substantially increased in all countries. CONCLUSIONS: Reinstitutionalisation is taking place in European countries with different traditions of health care, although with significant variation between the six countries studied. The precise reasons for the phenomenon remain unclear. General attitudes to risk containment in a society, as indicated by the size of the prison population, may be more important than changing morbidity and new methods of mental healthcare delivery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.38296.611215.ae

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Main limitations for psychotherapy in acute settings consist of short hospital stays and patients' difficulties to engage due to treatment resistance, high distrust, emotional distress, severe cognitive deficits, and dual diagnoses.

    “Main limitations consist of short hospital stays (111) and patients’ general difficulties to engage with traditional psychotherapy concepts due to treatment resistance (112, 113), high distrust levels toward the entire environment (114), emotional distress (115), severe cognitive deficits (116), and dual diagnoses (117).”

    From Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach (2023) · cites this paper as [113]

    Citation (111) is attached to the claim about short hospital stays. The Methods and Results compare numbers of beds and admissions across countries, but neither those passages nor the additional searches for hospital-stay length and psychotherapy address whether short stays limit psychotherapy in acute settings. The other engagement difficulties are attached to different citations. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ebers GC, Yee IM, Sadovnick AD, Duquette P. Conjugal multiple sclero- sis: population-based prevalence and recurrence risks in offspring. Cana- dian Collaborative Study Group. Ann Neurol 2000;48:927-31.
  2. Kurtzke JF, Beebe GW, Norman JE Jr. Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in US veterans: 1. race, sex, and geographic distribution. Neurology 1979;29:1228-35.
  3. Fakhoury W, Priebe S. The process of de-institutionalisation: an interna- tional overview. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2002;15:187-92.
  4. Freeman H. Community psychiatry. In: Freeman H, ed. A century of psychiatry. London: Mosby-Wolf, 1999:213-8.
  5. Jones K. Asylums and after. London: Athlone Press, 1993.
  6. Priebe S. Institutionalisation revisited-with and without walls. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2004;110:81-2.
  7. Leff J, Trieman N, Knapp M. The TAPS project: a report on 13 years research, 1985-1998. Psychiatr Bull 2004;24:165-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Priebe, S., Badesconyi, A., Fioritti, A., Hansson, L., Kilian, R., Torres-Gonzales, F., Turner, T., & Wiersma, D.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Priebe, Stefan
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2004-11-26
Volume
330
Issue
7483
Pages
123-126
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2114153799
Cited by
463
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 25
FWCI
22.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
  • Multiple Sclerosis Society
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Keywords
mental health services, deinstitutionalization, involuntary admission, supported housing, psychiatric hospital beds, prison population, risk containment, European comparison
MeSH terms
Bed Occupancy, Mental Disorders, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Commitment of Mentally Ill, Europe, Forensic Psychiatry, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Institutionalization, Mental Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review