Cited by 200Health and Conflict StudiesEnvironmental and Biological Research in Conflict ZonesPolitical Conflict and Governance

Fifty years of violent war deaths from Vietnam to Bosnia: analysis of data from the world health survey programme

Open access
Obermeyer, Ziad, Murray, Christopher J L, Gakidou, Emmanuela·2008·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide an accurate estimate of violent war deaths. DESIGN: Analysis of survey data on mortality, adjusted for sampling bias and censoring, from nationally representative surveys designed to measure population health. Estimated deaths compared with estimates in database of passive reports. SETTING: 2002-3 World health surveys, in which information was collected from one respondent per household about sibling deaths, including whether such deaths resulted from war injuries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Estimated deaths from war injuries in 13 countries over 50 years. RESULTS: From 1955 to 2002, data from the surveys indicated an estimated 5.4 million violent war deaths (95% confidence interval 3.0 to 8.7 million) in 13 countries, ranging from 7000 in the Republic of Congo [corrected] to 3.8 million in Vietnam. From 1995 to 2002 survey data indicate 36,000 war deaths annually (16,000 to 71,000) in the 13 countries studied. Data from passive surveillance, however, indicated a figure of only a third of this. On the basis of the relation between world health survey data and passive reports, we estimate 378,000 globalwar deaths annually from 1985-94, the last years for which complete passive surveillance data were available. CONCLUSIONS: The use of data on sibling history from peacetime population surveys can retrospectively estimate mortality from war. War causes more deaths than previously estimated, and there is no evidence to support a recent decline in war deaths.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.a137

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 11 GakidouE,HoganM,LopezAD.Adultmortality:timeforareappraisal. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:710-7.
  2. 22 Heuveline P. ' Between one and three million ' : towards the demographicreconstructionofadecadeofCambodianhistory(197079). Popul Stud (Camb) 1998;52:49-65.
  3. 23 KiernanB.ThedemographyofgenocideinSoutheastAsia -thedeath tolls in Cambodia, 1975-79, and East Timor, 1975-80. Critical Asian Studies 2003;35:585-97.
  4. 25 Hill K. Adult mortality in the developing world: what we know and how we know it. Training workshop on HIV/AIDS and adult mortality in developing countries . New York: United Nations Population Division, 2003.
  5. 34 LacinaB,GleditschNP,RussettB.Thedecliningriskofdeathinbattle. Int Stud Q 2006;50:673-80.
  6. 37 Mack A. Human security report 2005: war and peace in the 21st century . New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
  7. 42 GakidouE,KingG.Deathbysurvey:estimatingadultmortalitywithout selection bias from sibling survival data. Demography 2006;43:569-85.
  8. 44 KingG,TomzM,WittenbergJ.Makingthemostofstatisticalanalyses: improving interpretation and presentation. AmJ Pol Sci 2000;44:347-61.
  9. 56 YangGH,RaoC,MaJM,WangLJ,WanX,DubrovskyG,etal.Validation ofverbalautopsyproceduresforadultdeathsinChina. Int J Epidemiol 2006;35:741-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Obermeyer, Z., Murray, C. J. L., & Gakidou, E.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Obermeyer, Ziad
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2008-06-19
Volume
336
Issue
7659
Pages
1482-1486
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1977347639
Cited by
200
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
23.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
death in war, war injuries, World Health Survey, passive surveillance, mortality estimation, conflict-related deaths, Vietnam War, Bosnia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Epidemiologic Methods, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Violence, Warfare, Global Health, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review