The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: A framework for researching clinical outcomes
Open accessAbstract
Understanding and improving the prognosis of a disease or health condition is a priority in clinical research and practice. In this article, the authors introduce a framework of four interrelated themes in prognosis research, describe the importance of the first of these themes (understanding future outcomes in relation to current diagnostic and treatment practices), and introduce recommendations for the field of prognosis research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Projections of Global Mortality and Burden of Disease from 2002 to 2030
Mathers, C. D., & Loncar, D. (2006) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442 · Cited by 11,386
Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980–2000
Ford, E. S., Ajani, U. A., Croft, J. B., Critchley, J. A., Labarthe, D. R., Kottke, T. E., Giles, W. H., & Capewell, S. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa053935 · Cited by 2,757
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK)
McShane, L. M., Altman, D. G., Sauerbrei, W., Taube, S. E., Gion, M., & Clark, G. M. (2005) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/dji237 · Cited by 2,162
Self-citationPrognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model Research
Steyerberg, E. W., Moons, K. G. M., van der Windt, D. A., Hayden, J. A., Perel, P., Schroter, S., Riley, R. D., Hemingway, H., Altman, D. G., & for the PROGRESS Group (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001381 · Cited by 1,508 · cited 2×
“…3 (3) The development, validation, and impact of statistical models that predict individual risk of a future outcome (prognostic model research) 4 (4) The use of prognostic information to help tailor treatment decisions to an individual or group of individuals with similar characteristics…”
Self-citationMin, J. K., Shaw, L. J., Devereux, R. B., Okin, P. M., Weinsaft, J. W., Russo, D. J., Lippolis, N. J., Berman, D. S., & Callister, T. Q. (2007) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.067 · Cited by 1,055
Probst, V., Veltmann, C., Eckardt, L., Meregalli, P. G., Gaita, F., Tan, H. L., Babuty, D., Sacher, F., Giustetto, C., Schulze-Bahr, E., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.887026 · Cited by 847
Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor Research
Riley, R. D., Hayden, J. A., Steyerberg, E. W., Moons, K. G. M., Abrams, K., Kyzas, P. A., Malats, N., Briggs, A., Schroter, S., Altman, D. G., et al. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001380 · Cited by 823
Self-citationWill this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain?
Chou, R. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.344 · Cited by 701
Prognosis for patients with chronic low back pain: Inception cohort study
Costa, L. D. C. M., Maher, C. G., McAuley, J. H., Hancock, M. J., Herbert, R. D., Refshauge, K. M., & Henschke, N. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b3829 · Cited by 430
A prognostic approach to defining chronic pain
Von Korff, M., & Miglioretti, D. L. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2005.06.017 · Cited by 199
Cited by
Moons, K. G. M., Altman, D. G., Reitsma, J. B., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Macaskill, P., Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Ransohoff, D. F., & Collins, G. S. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-0698 · Cited by 5,147
Self-citationPROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies
Wolff, R. F., Moons, K. G. M., Riley, R. D., Whiting, P. F., Westwood, M., Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Kleijnen, J., Mallett, S., & for the PROBAST Group† (2019) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m18-1376 · Cited by 2,984
Self-citationMoons, K. G. M., Wolff, R. F., Riley, R. D., Whiting, P. F., Westwood, M., Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Kleijnen, J., & Mallett, S. (2019) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m18-1377 · Cited by 1,669
Self-citationPrognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model Research
Steyerberg, E. W., Moons, K. G. M., van der Windt, D. A., Hayden, J. A., Perel, P., Schroter, S., Riley, R. D., Hemingway, H., Altman, D. G., & for the PROGRESS Group (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001381 · Cited by 1,508
Self-citationIorio, A., Spencer, F. A., Falavigna, M., Alba, C., Lang, E., Burnand, B., McGinn, T., Hayden, J., Williams, K., Shea, B., et al. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h870 · Cited by 880
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hemingway, H., Croft, P., Perel, P., Hayden, J. A., Abrams, K., Timmis, A., Briggs, A., Udumyan, R., Moons, K. G. M., Steyerberg, E. W., Roberts, I., Schroter, S., Altman, D. G., Riley, R. D., & for the PROGRESS Group
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2013-02-05
- Volume
- 346
- Issue
- feb05 1
- Pages
- e5595-e5595
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2159235877
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 36.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: A framework for researching clinical outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.e5595
- The paper
- Hemingway, H., Croft, P., Perel, P., Hayden, J. A., Abrams, K., Timmis, A., Briggs, A., Udumyan, R., Moons, K. G. M., Steyerberg, E. W., Roberts, I., Schroter, S., Altman, D. G., Riley, R. D., & for the PROGRESS Group. (2013). Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: A framework for researching clinical outcomes. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5595
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
