Cited by 941Global Maternal and Child HealthPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study

Open access
Gardosi, J., Madurasinghe, V., Williams, M., Malik, A., Francis, A.·2013·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the main risk factors associated with stillbirth in a multiethnic English maternity population. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: National Health Service region in England. POPULATION: 92,218 normally formed singletons including 389 stillbirths from 24 weeks of gestation, delivered during 2009-11. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Risk of stillbirth. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis identified a significant risk of stillbirth for parity (para 0 and para ≥ 3), ethnicity (African, African-Caribbean, Indian, and Pakistani), maternal obesity (body mass index ≥ 30), smoking, pre-existing diabetes, and history of mental health problems, antepartum haemorrhage, and fetal growth restriction (birth weight below 10th customised birthweight centile). As potentially modifiable risk factors, maternal obesity, smoking in pregnancy, and fetal growth restriction together accounted for 56.1% of the stillbirths. Presence of fetal growth restriction constituted the highest risk, and this applied to pregnancies where mothers did not smoke (adjusted relative risk 7.8, 95% confidence interval 6.6 to 10.9), did smoke (5.7, 3.6 to 10.9), and were exposed to passive smoke only (10.0, 6.6 to 15.8). Fetal growth restriction also had the largest population attributable risk for stillbirth and was fivefold greater if it was not detected antenatally than when it was (32.0% v 6.2%). In total, 195 of the 389 stillbirths in this cohort had fetal growth restriction, but in 160 (82%) it had not been detected antenatally. Antenatal recognition of fetal growth restriction resulted in delivery 10 days earlier than when it was not detected: median 270 (interquartile range 261-279) days v 280 (interquartile range 273-287) days. The overall stillbirth rate (per 1000 births) was 4.2, but only 2.4 in pregnancies without fetal growth restriction, increasing to 9.7 with antenatally detected fetal growth restriction and 19.8 when it was not detected. CONCLUSION: Most normally formed singleton stillbirths are potentially avoidable. The single largest risk factor is unrecognised fetal growth restriction, and preventive strategies need to focus on improving antenatal detection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.f108

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study found an elevated risk for stillbirth in women with a history of mental health problems compared to controls with no previous mental illness.

    “For example, one study [58] found an elevated risk for SB in women with a history of mental health problems compared to controls with no previous mental illness.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gardosi, J., Madurasinghe, V., Williams, M., Malik, A., & Francis, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • Perinatal Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Gardosi, J.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-01-24
Volume
346
Issue
jan24 3
Pages
f108-f108
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079192915
Cited by
941
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 27
FWCI
53.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
stillbirth, fetal growth restriction, maternal obesity, smoking during pregnancy, passive smoking, parity, ethnicity, antepartum hemorrhage, pregestational diabetes, maternal mental health, population attributable risk, gestational age at delivery, singleton pregnancy, England, National Health Service, stillbirth rate
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Diabetes Mellitus, England, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, India, Obesity, Pakistan, Parity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Risk Factors, Smoking, Uterine Hemorrhage, Multivariate Analysis, Black People, Stillbirth, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review