Cited by 36Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesBirth, Development, and HealthMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Ten‐year experience of protocol‐based management of small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses: perinatal outcome in late‐pregnancy cases diagnosed after 32 weeks

Open access
Meler, E., Mazarico, E., Eixarch, E., Gonzalez, A., Peguero, A., Martinez, J., Boada, D., Vellvé, K. +3 more·2021·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objective: To report our 10‐year experience of protocol‐based management of small‐for‐gestational‐age (SGA) fetuses, based on standardized clinical and Doppler criteria, in late‐pregnancy cases. Methods: A retrospective cohort was constructed of consecutive singleton pregnancies referred for late‐onset (> 32 weeks) SGA (defined as estimated fetal weight (EFW) < 10 th centile) that were classified as fetal growth restriction (FGR) or low‐risk SGA, based on the severity of smallness (EFW < 3 rd centile) and the presence of Doppler abnormalities (uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA‐PI) ≥ 95 th centile or cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) < 5 th centile). Low‐risk SGA pregnancies were followed at 2‐week intervals and delivered electively at 40 weeks. FGR pregnancies were followed at 1‐week intervals, or more frequently if there were signs of fetal deterioration, and were delivered electively after 37 + 0 weeks' gestation. The occurrence of stillbirth and composite adverse outcome (CAO; defined as neonatal death, metabolic acidosis, need for endotracheal intubation or need for admission to the neonatal intensive care unit) was analyzed in low‐risk SGA and FGR pregnancies. Results: A total of 1197 pregnancies with EFW < 10 th centile were identified and classified at diagnosis as low‐risk SGA ( n = 619; 51.7%) or FGR ( n = 578; 48.3%). Of these, 160 were delivered before 37 weeks' gestation; for obstetric reasons in 93 (58.1%) cases, severe pre‐eclampsia in 33 (20.6%), FGR with severe hypoxia in 47 (29.4%) and stillbirth in four (2.5%) (indications are non‐exclusive). During follow‐up, 52/574 (9.1%) low‐risk SGA pregnancies were reclassified as FGR, whereas 22/463 (4.8%) FGR pregnancies were reclassified as low‐risk SGA. Overall, there were no stillbirths in the low‐risk SGA group and four in the FGR group, all of which occurred before 37 weeks. There were no instances of neonatal death in pregnancies delivered ≥ 37 weeks. The risk of CAO was higher in those meeting antenatal criteria for FGR at 37 weeks than in those classified as low‐risk SGA (32/493 (6.5%) vs 15/544 (2.8%); odds ratio, 2.5 (95% CI, 1.3–4.6)). In FGR pregnancies, the adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) for CAO was 6.3 (1.8–21.1) in those with EFW < 3 rd centile, while it was 3.2 (1.5–6.8) and 4.2 (1.9–8.9) in those with UtA‐PI ≥ 95 th centile and CPR < 5 th centile, respectively, as compared to FGR pregnancies without each of these criteria. Conclusion: Protocol‐based risk stratification with different management and monitoring schemes for late pregnancy with a suspected SGA baby, based on clinical and Doppler criteria, enables identification and tailored assessment of high‐risk FGR, while allowing expectant management with safe perinatal outcome for low‐risk SGA fetuses. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.23537

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Identifying FGR risk at 20-24 weeks - before overt restriction - creates opportunities for proactive management.

    “Identifying FGR risk at 20–24 weeks – before overt restriction – creates opportunities for proactive management.2,13,31,32”

    From Early detection of severe fetal growth restriction using multimodal deep learning based on ultrasound and prenatal biomarkers (2026) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Study subjects section (page not available) says the cohort comprised suspected SGA pregnancies diagnosed after 32 weeks. The Management section describes monitoring and delivery plans based on FGR risk, supporting the management point, but the paper does not establish that identifying risk at 20–24 weeks, before overt restriction, creates that opportunity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meler, E., Mazarico, E., Eixarch, E., Gonzalez, A., Peguero, A., Martinez, J., Boada, D., Vellvé, K., Gomez‐Roig, M. D., Gratacós, E., & Figueras, F.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona (ES)
  • Barcelona Center for Maternal–Fetal and Neonatal Medicine Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
Corresponding author
Figueras, F.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-01
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
62-69
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W3095052076
Cited by
36
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya (SLT008/18/00156)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI14/00226, PIE15/00027, PI16/00861, PI18/00073)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
small-for-gestational-age fetuses, fetal growth restriction, late-onset fetal growth restriction, uterine artery pulsatility index, cerebroplacental ratio, Doppler ultrasound, elective delivery, perinatal outcomes, stillbirth, neonatal intensive care admission, preeclampsia, hypoxia, estimated fetal weight, late pregnancy
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Pulsatile Flow, Retrospective Studies, Umbilical Arteries, Risk Assessment, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Middle Cerebral Artery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review