Cited by 161Pregnancy and Medication ImpactPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Specific SSRIs and birth defects: bayesian analysis to interpret new data in the context of previous reports

Open access
Reefhuis, Jennita, Devine, Owen, Friedman, Jan M, Louik, Carol, Honein, Margaret A·2015·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To follow up on previously reported associations between periconceptional use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and specific birth defects using an expanded dataset from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. DESIGN: Bayesian analysis combining results from independent published analyses with data from a multicenter population based case-control study of birth defects. SETTING: 10 centers in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: 17,952 mothers of infants with birth defects and 9857 mothers of infants without birth defects, identified through birth certificates or birth hospitals, with estimated dates of delivery between 1997 and 2009. EXPOSURES: Citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, or sertraline use in the month before through the third month of pregnancy. Posterior odds ratio estimates were adjusted to account for maternal race/ethnicity, education, smoking, and prepregnancy obesity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: 14 birth defects categories that had associations with SSRIs reported in the literature. RESULTS: Sertraline was the most commonly reported SSRI, but none of the five previously reported birth defects associations with sertraline was confirmed. For nine previously reported associations between maternal SSRI use and birth defect in infants, findings were consistent with no association. High posterior odds ratios excluding the null value were observed for five birth defects with paroxetine (anencephaly 3.2, 95% credible interval 1.6 to 6.2; atrial septal defects 1.8, 1.1 to 3.0; right ventricular outflow tract obstruction defects 2.4, 1.4 to 3.9; gastroschisis 2.5, 1.2 to 4.8; and omphalocele 3.5, 1.3 to 8.0) and for two defects with fluoxetine (right ventricular outflow tract obstruction defects 2.0, 1.4 to 3.1 and craniosynostosis 1.9, 1.1 to 3.0). CONCLUSIONS: These data provide reassuring evidence for some SSRIs but suggest that some birth defects occur 2-3.5 times more frequently among the infants of women treated with paroxetine or fluoxetine early in pregnancy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.h3190

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The risk of birth defects seems to be increased in infants of women treated with some SSRIs during pregnancy.

    “Additionally, the risk of birth defects seems to be increased in infants of women treated with some SSRIs during pregnancy.51”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reefhuis, J., Devine, O., Friedman, J. M., Louik, C., & Honein, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Reefhuis, Jennita
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-07-08
Volume
351
Pages
h3190
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1930136637
Cited by
161
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 12
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, congenital malformations, paroxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram, anencephaly, atrial septal defect, right ventricular outflow tract obstruction, gastroschisis, omphalocele, craniosynostosis, posterior odds ratio
MeSH terms
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced, Adult, Bayes Theorem, Depression, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, United States, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Cardiovascular Abnormalities, Gastroschisis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review