Cited by 149Pregnancy and Medication ImpactMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Patterns of antidepressant medication use among pregnant women in a United States population

Alwan, Sura, Reefhuis, Jennita, Rasmussen, Sonja A., Friedman, Jan M., National Birth Defects Prevention Study·2011·The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

This article describes the pattern of reported antidepressant use around the time of pregnancy in a population-based sample of women who delivered live-born babies without birth defects. Data were used from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, an ongoing case-control study of risk factors for birth defects covering 10 US states. Mothers of live-born infants without birth defects (controls) born between 1998 and 2005 were randomly selected from each site. Information on the mother's characteristics and exposure to antidepressants was collected via a standardized telephone interview. Among 6582 mothers included in the study, 298 (4.5%) reported use of an antidepressant in the period of 3 months before through the end of pregnancy. Use of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors was reported most often (3.8%), followed by bupropion (0.7%). A statistically significant decline was observed, from 3.1% to 2.3% (P < .001), in reported use of antidepressants between the first and second month after conception. The frequency of reported antidepressant use at any time during pregnancy increased from 2.5% in 1998 to 8.1% in 2005 (P < .001) in 4 states. The findings show an increase in reported antidepressant use over a 9-year period and a substantial decrease in use around the usual time of pregnancy recognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0091270010373928

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alwan, S., Reefhuis, J., Rasmussen, S. A., Friedman, J. M., & Study, N. B. D. P.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Reefhuis, Jennita
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
264-270
ISSN
  • 0021-9754 (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2700
OpenAlex
W1978332054
Cited by
149
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
11.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
antidepressant use, pregnancy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, bupropion, prenatal drug exposure, congenital malformations, pregnancy recognition, National Birth Defects Prevention Study
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, Case-Control Studies, Bupropion, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review