Cited by 1,470Behavioral Health and InterventionsBehavioral and Psychological StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface.

Wood, Wendy, Neal, David T.·2007·Psychological Review

Abstract

The present model outlines the mechanisms underlying habitual control of responding and the ways in which habits interface with goals. Habits emerge from the gradual learning of associations between responses and the features of performance contexts that have historically covaried with them (e.g., physical settings, preceding actions). Once a habit is formed, perception of contexts triggers the associated response without a mediating goal. Nonetheless, habits interface with goals. Constraining this interface, habit associations accrue slowly and do not shift appreciably with current goal states or infrequent counterhabitual responses. Given these constraints, goals can (a) direct habits by motivating repetition that leads to habit formation and by promoting exposure to cues that trigger habits, (b) be inferred from habits, and (c) interact with habits in ways that preserve the learned habit associations. Finally, the authors outline the implications of the model for habit change, especially for the self-regulation of habit cuing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.843

Cites

153 of 153 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research across a very wide range of settings has shown that people maintain habitual behaviours even if their goals change.

    “Research in a very wide range of settingscar use, recycling, blood donation, votinghas shown that people maintain these habitual behaviours, even if their goals change (Wood & Neal, 2007).”
  • Experimental, observational and neuroscientific research shows that new behaviours must be practised repeatedly before they become automatic.

    “Experimental and observational research in a range of contexts, as well as evidence from neuroscientific research, shows that it is necessary to repeatedly practice new behaviours before they become automatic (see Wood and Neal, 2007).”
  • Wood and Neal (2007) have proposed that repetition of behaviour in a consistent setting could lead to the development of goal-directed automaticity rather than habit when the behaviour is complex.

    “Wood and Neal (2007) have proposed that repetition of behaviour in a consistent setting could lead to the development of goal-directed automaticity rather than habit when the behaviour is complex.”

    From How are habits formed: modelling habit formation in the real world (2010) · cites this paper as Wood and Neal, 2007

  • Because exercise behaviours can be considered more complex than eating or drinking behaviours, development of automaticity for these behaviours may take longer or reach a lower maximum.

    “Because exercise behaviours can be considered more complex than eating or drinking behaviours, development of automaticity for these behaviours may take longer or reach a lower maximum.”

    From How are habits formed: modelling habit formation in the real world (2010) · cites this paper as Wood and Neal, 2007

  • The SRHI items used here assess automaticity rather than habit strength.

    “The SRHI items used here assess automaticity rather than habit strength.”

    From How are habits formed: modelling habit formation in the real world (2010) · cites this paper as Wood and Neal (2007)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wood, W., & Neal, D. T.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
2007
Volume
114
Issue
4
Pages
843-863
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2103676101
Cited by
1,470
References
153
Citations by year
2026: 141 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 182 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 72
FWCI
36.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Duke University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
habit, habit formation, goal-directed behavior, habit change
MeSH terms
Automatism, Cues, Goals, Habits, Humans, Motivation, Social Control, Informal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review