Cited by 37Diabetes Treatment and ManagementChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesDiabetes Management and Research

Glycemic efficacy and safety of the SGLT2 inhibitor ertugliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and stage 3 chronic kidney disease: an analysis from the VERTIS CV randomized trial

Open access
Dagogo-Jack, Samuel, Pratley, Richard E, Cherney, David Z I, McGuire, Darren K, Cosentino, Francesco, Shih, Weichung J, Liu, Jie, Frederich, Robert +3 more·2021·BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

Abstract

Introduction: Here we report the glycemic efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin in patients in the VERTIS CV cardiovascular outcome trial with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3. Research design and methods: Prespecified and post-hoc analyses were performed in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 30–<60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 at screening. The primary endpoint was glycemic efficacy at week 18. Longer term glycemic efficacy and changes in body weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and eGFR were also evaluated. Results: Among 8246 patients in VERTIS CV, 1776 patients had CKD stage 3; 1319 patients had CKD stage 3A (eGFR 45–<60 mL/min/1.73 m 2); 457 patients had CKD stage 3B (eGFR 30–<45 mL/min/1.73 m 2). Week 18 least squares (LS)-mean (95% CI) placebo-adjusted changes from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for 5 mg and 15 mg ertugliflozin were −0.27% (−0.37% to –0.17%) and −0.28% (−0.38% to –0.17%), respectively, for CKD stage 3 overall and −0.27% (−0.38% to –0.15%) and −0.31% (−0.43% to –0.19%), respectively, for CKD stage 3A (all p<0.001). For CKD stage 3B, the reduction in HbA1c for 5 mg ertugliflozin was −0.28% (−0.47% to –0.08%) (p=0.006) and for 15 mg ertugliflozin was −0.19% (−0.39% to 0.01%) (p=0.064). LS-mean placebo-adjusted reductions in body weight (range: −1.32 to −1.95 kg) and SBP (range: −2.42 to −3.41 mm Hg) were observed across CKD stage 3 categories with ertugliflozin. After an initial dip, eGFR remained above or near baseline with ertugliflozin treatment. The incidence of overall adverse events (AEs), symptomatic hypoglycemia, hypovolemia, and kidney-related AEs did not differ between ertugliflozin and placebo across CKD stage 3 subgroups. Conclusions: In VERTIS CV patients with CKD stage 3A, ertugliflozin resulted in reductions in HbA1c, body weight and SBP, maintenance of eGFR, and was generally well tolerated. Results in the CKD stage 3B subgroup were generally similar except for an attenuated HbA1c response with the 15 mg dose. Trial registration number: NCT01986881.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002484

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. [1]United States Renal Data System. Chapter 1: CKD in the general population. In: 2020 USRDS annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2020. https://adr.usrds.org/2020/chronic-kidney-disease/1-ckd-in-the-general-population
  2. [2]Kibria GMA, Crispen R. Prevalence and trends of chronic kidney disease and its risk factors among US adults: an analysis of NHANES 2003-18. Prev Med Rep 2020; 20: 101193. 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101193 33101883 PMC7578737 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Zelnick LR, Weiss NS, Kestenbaum BR, et al. Diabetes and CKD in the United States population, 2009-2014. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2017; 12: 1984– 90. 10.2215/CJN.03700417 29054846 PMC5718269 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]United States Renal Data System. Chapter 4: Cardiovascular disease in patients with CKD. In: 2020 USRDS annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2020. https://adr.usrds.org/2020/chronic-kidney-disease/4-cardiovascular-disease-in-patients-with-ckd
  5. [5]Jankowski J, Floege J, Fliser D, et al. Cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease: pathophysiological insights and therapeutic options. Circulation 2021; 143: 1157– 72. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050686 33720773 PMC7969169 · DOI
  6. [6]Fioretto P, Zambon A, Rossato M, et al. SGLT2 inhibitors and the diabetic kidney. Diabetes Care 2016; 39 Suppl 2: S165– 71. 10.2337/dcS15-3006 27440829 · DOI
  7. [7]Cherney DZ, Odutayo A, Aronson R, et al. Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibition and cardiorenal protection: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74: 2511– 24. 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.022 31727290 · DOI
  8. [8]Lopaschuk GD, Verma S. Mechanisms of cardiovascular benefits of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors: a state-of-the-art review. JACC Basic Transl Sci 2020; 5: 632– 44. 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.02.004 32613148 PMC7315190 · DOI
  9. [9]American Diabetes Association. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 2020; 43: S98– 110. 10.2337/dc20-S009 31862752 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [10]American Diabetes Association. 11. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 2020; 43: S135– 51. 10.2337/dc20-S011 31862754 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [11]Buse JB, Wexler DJ, Tsapas A, et al. 2019 update to: management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia 2020; 63: 221– 8. 10.1007/s00125-019-05039-w 31853556 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [14]Cannon CP, McGuire DK, Pratley R, et al. Design and baseline characteristics of the eValuation of ERTugliflozin effIcacy and Safety CardioVascular outcomes trial (VERTIS-CV). Am Heart J 2018; 206: 11– 23. 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.08.016 30290289 · DOI
  13. [15]Cannon CP, Pratley R, Dagogo-Jack S, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes with ertugliflozin in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2020; 383: 1425– 35. 10.1056/NEJMoa2004967 32966714 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [16]Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 247– 54. 10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00004 16908915 · DOI
  15. [17]Fediuk DJ, Nucci G, Dawra VK, et al. End-to-end application of model-informed drug development for ertugliflozin, a novel sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2021; 10: 529– 42. 10.1002/psp4.12633 33932126 PMC8213419 · DOI
  16. [18]Liu J, Tarasenko L, Terra SG, et al. Efficacy of ertugliflozin in monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis of placebo-controlled studies. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2019; 16: 415– 23. 10.1177/1479164119842513 31081371 · DOI
  17. [19]Wanner C, Lachin JM, Inzucchi SE, et al. Empagliflozin and clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, established cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease. Circulation 2018; 137: 119– 29. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028268 28904068 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [20]Neuen BL, Ohkuma T, Neal B, et al. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with canagliflozin according to baseline kidney function. Circulation 2018; 138: 1537– 50. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035901 29941478 PMC6181277 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [21]Fioretto P, Del Prato S, Buse JB, et al. Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate renal impairment (chronic kidney disease stage 3A): the DERIVE study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018; 20: 2532– 40. 10.1111/dom.13413 29888547 PMC6175614 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [22]Grunberger G, Camp S, Johnson J, et al. Ertugliflozin in patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus: the VERTIS RENAL randomized study. Diabetes Ther 2018; 9: 49– 66. 10.1007/s13300-017-0337-5 29159457 PMC5801223 · DOI
  21. [23]Cherney DZI, Cooper ME, Tikkanen I, et al. Pooled analysis of Phase III trials indicate contrasting influences of renal function on blood pressure, body weight, and HbA1c reductions with empagliflozin. Kidney Int 2018; 93: 231– 44. 10.1016/j.kint.2017.06.017 28860019 · DOI · Paper page
  22. [24]Lautsch D, Alsumali A, McLeod E, et al. Comparative efficacy of dual and single initiation of add-on oral antihyperglycemic agents in type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on metformin alone: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis. Diabetes Ther 2021; 12: 389– 418. 10.1007/s13300-020-00975-y 33313996 PMC7843850 · DOI
  23. [25]Patel S, Hickman A, Frederich R, et al. Safety of ertugliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: pooled analysis of seven phase 3 randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Ther 2020; 11: 1347– 67. 10.1007/s13300-020-00803-3 32372382 PMC7261307 · DOI
  24. [26]Mosenzon O, Wiviott SD, Cahn A, et al. Effects of dapagliflozin on development and progression of kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: an analysis from the DECLARE-TIMI 58 randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019; 7: 606– 17. 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30180-9 31196815 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [27]Wanner C, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin and progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 323– 34. 10.1056/NEJMoa1515920 27299675 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [31]McGuire DK, Shih WJ, Cosentino F, et al. Association of SGLT2 inhibitors with cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol 2021; 6: 148– 58. 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4511 33031522 PMC7542529 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [32]Cherney DZI, Charbonnel B, Cosentino F, et al. Effects of ertugliflozin on kidney composite outcomes, renal function and albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an analysis from the randomised VERTIS CV trial. Diabetologia 2021; 64: 1256– 67. 10.1007/s00125-021-05407-5 33665685 PMC8099851 · DOI
  28. [33]Cosentino F, Cannon CP, Cherney DZI, et al. Efficacy of ertugliflozin on heart failure-related events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: results of the VERTIS CV trial. Circulation 2020; 142: 2205– 15. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050255 33026243 PMC7717477 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dagogo-Jack, S., Pratley, R. E., Cherney, D. Z. I., McGuire, D. K., Cosentino, F., Shih, W. J., Liu, J., Frederich, R., Mancuso, J. P., Raji, A., & Gantz, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • AdventHealth Orlando (US)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Parkland Health & Hospital System (US)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Dagogo-Jack, Samuel
Venue
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2021-10
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
e002484
ISSN
2052-4897 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3202291872
Cited by
37
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Not applicable; general funding of clinical trial)
  • Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA (Not applicable; general funding of clinical trial)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
ertugliflozin, SGLT2 inhibitors, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease stage 3, HbA1c, cardiovascular outcomes, body weight, systolic blood pressure, EGFR, adverse events, hypoglycemia, hypovolemia, dose comparison
MeSH terms
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Treatment Outcome, Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review