Cited by 6,189Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementAcute Kidney Injury Research

Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy

Open access
Perkovic, Vlado, Jardine, Meg J., Neal, Bruce, Bompoint, Severine, Heerspink, Hiddo J.L., Charytan, David M., Edwards, Robert, Agarwal, Rajiv +16 more·2019·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of kidney failure worldwide, but few effective long-term treatments are available. In cardiovascular trials of inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), exploratory results have suggested that such drugs may improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: ), a doubling of the serum creatinine level, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes. Prespecified secondary outcomes were tested hierarchically. RESULTS: The trial was stopped early after a planned interim analysis on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee. At that time, 4401 patients had undergone randomization, with a median follow-up of 2.62 years. The relative risk of the primary outcome was 30% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group, with event rates of 43.2 and 61.2 per 1000 patient-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.82; P = 0.00001). The relative risk of the renal-specific composite of end-stage kidney disease, a doubling of the creatinine level, or death from renal causes was lower by 34% (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.81; P<0.001), and the relative risk of end-stage kidney disease was lower by 32% (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.86; P = 0.002). The canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95; P = 0.01) and hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of amputation or fracture. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease, the risk of kidney failure and cardiovascular events was lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group at a median follow-up of 2.62 years. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; CREDENCE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02065791.).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1811744

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

10 of 15 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    In cardiovascular trials of SGLT2 inhibitors, exploratory results have suggested that such drugs may improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

    “In cardiovascular trials of inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), exploratory results have suggested that such drugs may improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [7] 7. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 347-57. source
    • cites [8] 8. Perkovic V, de Zeeuw D, Mahaffey KW, et al. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: results from the CANVAS Program randomised clinical trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018; 6: 691-704. source
    • cites [9] 9. Wanner C, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin and progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 323-34. source
  • Premisecitation

    The only currently approved treatment for renoprotection in patients with type 2 diabetes is renin-angiotensin system blockade.

    “The only currently approved treatment for renoprotection in patients with type 2 diabetes is reninangiotensin system blockade, which was first shown to be effective 18 years ago.3,4”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] 3. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and car- diovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 861-9. source

      The Discussion (p. 4) reports that losartan, a renin–angiotensin system blocker, provides renal protection in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The paper does not establish that renin–angiotensin system blockade is the only approved renoprotective treatment, or extend its finding to all patients with type 2 diabetes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [4] 4. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angio- tensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 851-60. source

      The Conclusions (page not provided) report that irbesartan, an angiotensin-II-receptor blocker, protects against progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. The Discussion cautions against assuming equivalent effects for ACE inhibitors and receptor blockers in these patients. The paper does not establish that renin–angiotensin system blockade is the only currently approved renoprotective treatment. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    The effects of canagliflozin on the primary composite outcome were consistent across regions and other prespecified subgroups.

    “The effects were consistent across regions and other prespecified subgroups (Fig. 2, and Fig. S3 in the Supplementary Appendix)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Patients in the canagliflozin group had a lower risk of the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke than those in the placebo group.

    “Patients in the canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of endstage kidney disease, hospitalization for heart failure, and the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Patients in the canagliflozin group had a lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure than those in the placebo group.

    “Patients in the canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of endstage kidney disease, hospitalization for heart failure, and the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
  • May combine two claims. 17
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial showed that empagliflozin was superior to placebo.

    “The EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial also showed that empagliflozin was superior to placebo, 6”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] 6. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2117-28. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The similar rates of amputation and fracture are consistent with trials of other SGLT2 inhibitors but differ from the CANVAS Program findings.

    “The similar rates of amputation and fracture that we observed with canagliflozin and placebo are reassuring and consistent with trials of other SGLT2 inhibitors 6,7,20 but differ from the CANVAS Program findings.5”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [6] 6. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2117-28. source

      The Safety and Adverse Events section (p. 7) reports similar bone-fracture rates with empagliflozin and placebo, supporting the fracture comparison. Our copy does not report amputation rates, so it does not establish the amputation comparison. The CANVAS comparison is attached to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [7] 7. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 347-57. source
    • cites [20] 20. Inzucchi SE, Iliev H, Pfarr E, Zinman B. Empagliflozin and assessment of lower- limb amputations in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Diabetes Care 2018; 41(1): e4-e5. source
    • cites [5] 5. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and re- nal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 644-57. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The significantly lower rates of cardiovascular outcomes, including the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, in the canagliflozin group are consistent with those observed with canagliflozin in the CANVAS Program, despite smaller differences in glycemic control.

    “The significantly lower rates of cardiovascular outcomes, including the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, in the canagliflozin group in our trial are consistent with those observed with canagliflozin in the CANVAS (Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study) Program, 5 despite the smaller differences in glycemic control.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] 5. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and re- nal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 644-57. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The observed benefits were obtained on a background of renin-angiotensin system blockade, the only approved renoprotective medications in type 2 diabetes.

    “The observed benefits were obtained on a background of renin-angiotensin system blockade, the only approved renoprotective medications in type 2 diabetes, a factor that highlights the clinical significance of the findings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Rates of diabetic ketoacidosis were low but higher in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group (2.2 vs. 0.2 per 1000 patient-years).

    “Rates of diabetic ketoacidosis were low but higher in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group (2.2 vs. 0.2 per 1000 patient-years)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Rates of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar overall in the canagliflozin group and the placebo group.

    “Rates of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar overall in the canagliflozin group and the placebo group (Table 2, and Tables S4 and S5 in the Supplementary Appendix).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was no significant difference in the risk of lower-limb amputation, with rates of 12.3 versus 11.2 per 1000 patient-years in the canagliflozin group and the placebo group, respectively (HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.79-1.56).

    “There was no significant difference in the risk of lowerlimb amputation, with rates of 12.3 versus 11.2 per 1000 patient-years in the canagliflozin group and the placebo group, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.56).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Patients who received canagliflozin, including those with reduced estimated GFR at baseline, had a lower risk of the primary outcome overall than those in the placebo group, as well as less end-stage kidney disease.

    “In addition, we found that patients who received canagliflozin (including those who had a reduced estimated GFR at baseline) had a lower risk of the primary outcome overall than those in the placebo group, as well as less end-stage kidney disease.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Subgroup analyses were assessed by tests for the interaction between trial group and subgroup in stratified Cox proportional-hazards models without adjustment for multiple testing.

    “Subgroup analyses were assessed by tests for the interaction between the trial group and the subgroup in stratified Cox proportionalhazards models without adjustment for multiple testing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    A single interim analysis was to be conducted by an independent data monitoring committee after the primary outcome had occurred in 405 patients.

    “A single interim analysis was to be conducted by an independent data monitoring committee after the primary outcome had occurred in 405 patients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    In the intention-to-treat population, a stratified Cox proportional-hazards model was used to analyze the primary and secondary outcomes according to category of estimated GFR at screening.

    “In the intention-to-treat population, we used a stratified Cox proportional-hazards model to analyze the primary and secondary outcomes, according to the category of estimated GFR at screening.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    At the trial conclusion at a median follow-up of 2.62 years, 1201 patients (27.3%) in the two groups had discontinued therapy, and the rate of adherence to the trial regimen was 84% during follow-up.

    “At the trial conclusion at a median follow-up of 2.62 years (range, 0.02 to 4.53), 1201 patients (27.3%) in the two groups had discontinued therapy (Table S3 and Figs.S1 and S2 in the Supplementary Appendix); the rate of adherence to the trial regimen was 84% during follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Analyses were performed by the sponsor and independently confirmed at George Clinical with the use of original data.

    “Analyses were performed by the sponsor and independently con-firmed at George Clinical with the use of original data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Prespecified stopping guidance proposed possible recommendation of early cessation if clear evidence of benefit was observed for the primary outcome (P<0.01) and the composite of end-stage kidney disease or death from renal or cardiovascular causes (P<0.025), with consideration of overall balance of risks and benefits.

    “Prespecified stopping guidance that was provided to the data monitoring committee by the steering committee proposed possible recommendation of early cessation if clear evidence of benefit was observed for the primary outcome (P<0.01) and the composite of end-stage kidney disease or death from renal or cardiovascular causes (P<0.025), with consideration of the overall balance of risks and benefits”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Because there was no significant between-group difference in cardiovascular death, the differences in all subsequent outcomes in the hierarchical testing sequence were not formally tested.

    “so the differences in all subsequent outcomes in the hierarchical testing sequence were not formally tested.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data

    Canagliflozin treatment would prevent 25 composite events of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke per 1000 patients over 2.5 years (NNT 40; 95% CI 23 to 165).

    “and 25 composite events of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (NNT, 40; 95% CI, 23 to 165).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The trial was designed to be event-driven, with enrollment of at least 4200 patients (844 events) required to provide 90% power to detect a risk of the primary outcome that was 20% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group at an alpha level of 0.045 after adjustment for one interim analysis.

    “The trial was designed to be event-driven, with the enrollment of at least 4200 patients (844 events) required to provide a power of 90% to detect a risk of the primary outcome that was 20% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group at an alpha level of 0.045 after adjustment for one interim analysis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All renal and cardiovascular outcomes that were part of the primary and secondary outcomes, as well as key safety outcomes, were adjudicated by independent adjudication committees whose members were unaware of trial-group assignments.

    “All renal and cardiovascular outcomes that were part of the primary and secondary outcomes, as well as key safety outcomes (fractures, pancreatitis, ketoacidosis, and renal-cell carcinoma), were adjudicated by independent adjudication committees whose members were unaware of trial-group assignments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Secondary outcomes were tested at a two-sided level of 0.038 to account for type I error inflation in the group sequential design.

    “the secondary outcomes would be tested at a two-sided level of 0.038, to account for type I error inflation in the group sequential design.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion (1:1) to receive canagliflozin or matching placebo with the use of randomly permuted blocks, with stratification according to category of estimated GFR at screening.

    “The patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion (1:1) to receive either canagliflozin (100 mg orally once daily) or matching placebo with the use of randomly permuted blocks, with stratification according to the category of estimated GFR (30 to <45 ml, 45 to <60 ml, or 60 to <90 ml per minute per 1.73 m 2 ) at screening.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    A total of 4361 patients (99.1%) were either alive with follow-up at the end of the trial or had died before the final follow-up visit, and vital status was ascertained for all but 6 patients (4395 [99.9%]).

    “A total of 4361 patients (99.1%) were either alive with follow-up at the end of the trial or had died before the final follow-up visit.Consent was withdrawn by 16 patients (0.4%), and vital status was ascertained for all but 6 patients (4395 [99.9%]).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The trial was stopped early after a planned interim analysis on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee.

    “The trial was stopped early after a planned interim analysis on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In contrast to completed cardiovascular outcome trials of SGLT2 inhibitors, this trial included a population at high risk for kidney failure and had a primary outcome of major renal end points.

    “In contrast to completed cardiovascular outcome trials of SGLT2 inhibitors, [5][6][7] our trial included a population at high risk for kidney failure and had a primary outcome of major renal end points.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5][6][7]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Analyses for fracture, renal-cell carcinoma, acute pancreatitis, and diabetic ketoacidosis were based on confirmed and adjudicated results.

    “The analyses for fracture, renal-cell carcinoma, acute pancreatitis, and diabetic ketoacidosis were based on confirmed and adjudicated results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The trial was stopped early at a planned interim analysis, which may have limited the power for some secondary outcomes and may increase the risk of overestimating effect sizes.

    “First, the trial was stopped early at a planned interim analysis, which may have limited the power for some secondary outcomes and may increase the risk of overestimating effect sizes.21”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] 21. Guyatt GH, Briel M, Glasziou P, Bassler D, Montori VM. Problems of stop- ping trials early. BMJ 2012; 344: e3863. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The trial excluded patients with very advanced kidney disease (estimated GFR <30 ml per minute per 1.73 m2), nonalbuminuric or microalbuminuric disease, and kidney diseases believed due to conditions other than type 2 diabetes, so it is not known whether the findings can be generalized to such populations.

    “Third, we excluded patients who had very advanced kidney disease (estimated GFR, <30 ml per minute per 1.73 m 2 ), nonalbuminuric or microalbuminuric disease, and kidney diseases believed to be due to conditions other than type 2 diabetes, so it is not known whether the findings can be generalized to such populations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All potential ketone-related events were adjudicated for diabetic ketoacidosis by an independent adjudication committee on the basis of clinical presentation and predefined biochemical measures.

    “All potential ketone-related events were adjudicated for diabetic ketoacidosis by an independent adjudication committee on the basis of clinical presentation and predefined biochemical measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The mechanism of benefit of canagliflozin is likely to be independent of glucose levels and may possibly stem from a reduction in intraglomerular pressure.

    “This suggests that the mechanism of benefit is likely to be independent of glucose levels and may possibly stem from a reduction in intraglomerular pressure, [11][12][13] with other possible mechanisms presently being studied.[14][15][16][17]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11][12][13]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The trial did not measure off-treatment estimated GFR levels among patients who completed the trial, so differences in estimated GFR at the end of the trial are probably underestimations.

    “Second, we did not measure off-treatment estimated GFR levels among the patients who had completed the trial, so the differences in the estimated GFR values at the end of the trial are probably underestimations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
29 of 29

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During CREDENCE trial recruitment, an amendment was introduced excluding those at risk for amputation.

    “However, during the CREDENCE trial recruitment, an amendment was introduced, excluding those at risk for amputation.”

    From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]

    The Trial Procedures section confirms a May 2016 amendment concerning amputation risk, but describes a different measure: foot examinations at each visit and temporary interruption of treatment for patients with an active condition that might lead to amputation. It does not describe excluding such patients during recruitment. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SGLT2 inhibitors and finerenone reduce albuminuria in clinical trials of advanced diabetic kidney disease.

    “SGLT2 inhibitors and finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, also reduce albuminuria in clinical trials of advanced diabetic kidney disease (471-473).”

    From Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus (2023) · cites this paper as [471]

    The Effect on Intermediate Outcomes section reports that urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio was 31% lower with canagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, than with placebo during follow-up. The Methods describe patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease, but the paper does not report a finerenone trial; it also says patients with very advanced kidney disease (estimated GFR below 30) were excluded. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In CREDENCE, canagliflozin reduced the risk of the secondary cardiovascular outcome of hospitalization for heart failure by 39% (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.47-0.80).

    “canagli fl ozin reduced the risk of the secondary cardiovascular outcomes of hospitalization for heart failure and MACE by 39% (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.47 -0.80)”

    From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]

    The Secondary and Exploratory Outcomes section reports a 39% lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure with canagliflozin (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.47–0.80), supporting the quoted claim. But the citing sentence also applies that figure to MACE; the paper reports HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.67–0.95) for the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SGLT2i conferred less annual eGFR decline and a reduction in albuminuria or decreased progression to severely increased albuminuria.

    “SGLT2i conferred less annual eGFR decline and a reduction in albuminuria or decreased progression to severely increased albuminuria.”

    From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]

    The Effect on Intermediate Outcomes section reports a slower annual eGFR decline and a 31% lower urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio with canagliflozin than with placebo. The trial studied one SGLT2 inhibitor in patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease; it does not establish these effects for the entire drug class or other populations. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the CREDENCE and DAPA-CKD trials, kidney outcomes were the primary outcome evaluated.

    “Of note, in the CREDENCE and DAPA-CKD trials, kidney outcomes were the primary outcome evaluated.”

    From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]

    The Outcomes section identifies a kidney-focused composite as CREDENCE’s primary outcome, including end-stage kidney disease, doubling of serum creatinine, or renal or cardiovascular death. This paper does not establish the primary outcome of DAPA-CKD, so it supports only the CREDENCE part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perkovic, V., Jardine, M. J., Neal, B., Bompoint, S., Heerspink, H. J. L., Charytan, D. M., Edwards, R., Agarwal, R., Bakris, G., Bull, S., Cannon, C. P., Capuano, G., Chu, P.-L., de Zeeuw, D., Greene, T., Levin, A., Pollock, C., Wheeler, D. C., Yavin, Y., Zhang, H., Zinman, B., Meininger, G., Brenner, B. M., & Mahaffey, K. W.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • From the George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales Sydney (V.P., M.J.J., B.N., S. Bompoint), the Royal North Shore Hospital (V.P.), Concord Repatriation General Hospital (M.J.J.), and the Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney (B.N.), Sydney, and the Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW (C.P.) — all in Australia; Imperial College London (B.N.) and the Department of Renal...
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2019-06-13
Volume
380
Issue
24
Pages
2295-2306
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2939222610
Cited by
6,189
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 666 · 2025: 733 · 2024: 833 · 2023: 892 · 2022: 900 · 2021: 954 · 2020: 841 · 2019: 353 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
588.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium (University of Szeged) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (acceptedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
canagliflozin, type 2 diabetes, diabetic nephropathy, SGLT2 inhibitors, renal outcomes, end-stage renal disease, cardiovascular events, heart failure hospitalization, kidney failure prevention, renal function decline, cardiovascular safety, early trial termination
MeSH terms
Canagliflozin, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Creatinine, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Nephropathies, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-16.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-16.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review