Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of kidney failure worldwide, but few effective long-term treatments are available. In cardiovascular trials of inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), exploratory results have suggested that such drugs may improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: ), a doubling of the serum creatinine level, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes. Prespecified secondary outcomes were tested hierarchically. RESULTS: The trial was stopped early after a planned interim analysis on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee. At that time, 4401 patients had undergone randomization, with a median follow-up of 2.62 years. The relative risk of the primary outcome was 30% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group, with event rates of 43.2 and 61.2 per 1000 patient-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.82; P = 0.00001). The relative risk of the renal-specific composite of end-stage kidney disease, a doubling of the creatinine level, or death from renal causes was lower by 34% (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.81; P<0.001), and the relative risk of end-stage kidney disease was lower by 32% (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.86; P = 0.002). The canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95; P = 0.01) and hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of amputation or fracture. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease, the risk of kidney failure and cardiovascular events was lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group at a median follow-up of 2.62 years. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; CREDENCE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02065791.).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
10 of 15 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In cardiovascular trials of SGLT2 inhibitors, exploratory results have suggested that such drugs may improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
“In cardiovascular trials of inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), exploratory results have suggested that such drugs may improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] 7. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 347-57. source
- cites [8] 8. Perkovic V, de Zeeuw D, Mahaffey KW, et al. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: results from the CANVAS Program randomised clinical trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018; 6: 691-704. source
- cites [9] 9. Wanner C, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin and progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 323-34. source
- Premisecitation
The only currently approved treatment for renoprotection in patients with type 2 diabetes is renin-angiotensin system blockade.
“The only currently approved treatment for renoprotection in patients with type 2 diabetes is reninangiotensin system blockade, which was first shown to be effective 18 years ago.3,4”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] 3. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and car- diovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 861-9. source
The Discussion (p. 4) reports that losartan, a renin–angiotensin system blocker, provides renal protection in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The paper does not establish that renin–angiotensin system blockade is the only approved renoprotective treatment, or extend its finding to all patients with type 2 diabetes. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [4] 4. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angio- tensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 851-60. source
The Conclusions (page not provided) report that irbesartan, an angiotensin-II-receptor blocker, protects against progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. The Discussion cautions against assuming equivalent effects for ACE inhibitors and receptor blockers in these patients. The paper does not establish that renin–angiotensin system blockade is the only currently approved renoprotective treatment. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
The effects of canagliflozin on the primary composite outcome were consistent across regions and other prespecified subgroups.
“The effects were consistent across regions and other prespecified subgroups (Fig. 2, and Fig. S3 in the Supplementary Appendix)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Patients in the canagliflozin group had a lower risk of the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke than those in the placebo group.
“Patients in the canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of endstage kidney disease, hospitalization for heart failure, and the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Patients in the canagliflozin group had a lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure than those in the placebo group.
“Patients in the canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of endstage kidney disease, hospitalization for heart failure, and the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Estimated GFR <15 ml/min/1.73m2 had a hazard ratio of 0.60 (95% CI 0.45-0.80).
“Estimated GFR <15 ml/min/1.73m 2 78/2202 125/2199 13.6 22.2 0.60 (0.45-0.80)NA”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
End-stage kidney disease, renal death, or cardiovascular death had a hazard ratio of 0.73 (95% CI 0.61-0.87).
“End-stage kidney disease, renal death, or cardiovascular death † 214/2202 287/2199 37.6 51.2 0.73 (0.61-0.87)NA”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The relative risk of end-stage kidney disease was 32% lower in the canagliflozin group (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.54-0.86; P=0.002).
“the relative risk of endstage kidney disease was lower by 32% (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.86; P = 0.002).”
- Also stated in: § Effect on the Primary Outcome and Renal Components · plain
“for the components of end-stage kidney disease (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.86; P = 0.002)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Effect on the Primary Outcome and Renal Components · plain
- Findingown data
In the CREDENCE trial, patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease who received canagliflozin had a lower risk of the primary composite outcome of end-stage kidney disease, doubling of the serum creatinine level, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes than those who received placebo.
“In this trial, we found that patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease who received canagliflozin had a lower risk of the primary composite outcome of end-stage kidney disease, doubling of the serum creatinine level, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes than those who received placebo.”
- Also stated in: § Geometric · plain
“In conclusion, among patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease, those in the canagliflozin group had a lower risk of kidney failure and cardiovascular events than those in the placebo group at a median follow-up of 2.62 years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Geometric · plain
- Findingown data
There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of cardiovascular death (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.61-1.00; P=0.05).
“There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.00; P = 0.05)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Systolic blood pressure was lower in the canagliflozin group by 3.30 mm Hg (95% CI 2.73-3.87).
“On average, levels were lower in the canagliflozin group for systolic blood pressure (by 3.30 mm Hg; 95% CI, 2.73 to 3.87)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The overall mean difference in the reduction in glycated hemoglobin throughout the trial was 0.25 percentage points (95% CI 0.20-0.31) lower in the canagliflozin group.
“with an overall mean difference in the reduction throughout the trial of 0.25 percentage points (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.31)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Rates of fracture were similar in the two groups (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.70-1.37).
“Rates of fracture were also similar in the two groups (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.37).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The canagliflozin group had a lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.47-0.80; P<0.001).
“and hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001).”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
- Findingown data
The canagliflozin group had a lower risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.67-0.95; P=0.01).
“The canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95; P = 0.01)”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95; P = 0.01)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
- Findingown data
During the first 3 weeks, there was a greater reduction in the estimated GFR in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group (-3.72±0.25 vs. -0.55±0.25 ml per minute per 1.73 m2), for a between-group difference of -3.17 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 (95% CI -3.87 to -2.47).
“During the first 3 weeks, there was a greater reduction in the estimated GFR in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group (-3.72±0.25 vs. -0.55±0.25 ml per minute per 1.73 m 2 ), for a between-group difference of -3.17 ml per minute per 1.73 m 2 (95% CI, -3.87 to -2.47).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were no significant differences in rates of amputation or fracture between canagliflozin and placebo.
“There were no significant differences in rates of amputation or fracture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The relative risk of the primary composite outcome of end-stage kidney disease, doubling of serum creatinine, or renal or cardiovascular death was 30% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.59-0.82; P=0.00001).
“The relative risk of the primary outcome was 30% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group, with event rates of 43.2 and 61.2 per 1000 patient-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.82; P = 0.00001).”
- Also stated in: § Effect on the Primary Outcome and Renal Components · plain
“The event rate of the primary composite outcome of end-stage kidney disease, doubling of the serum creatinine level, or renal or cardiovascular death was significantly lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group (43.2 and 61.2 per 1000 patient-years, respectively), which resulted in a 30% lower relative risk (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.82; P = 0.0000”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Effect on the Primary Outcome and Renal Components · plain
- Findingown data
For glycated hemoglobin, the least-squares mean level at 13 weeks was lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group by 0.31 percentage points (95% CI 0.26-0.37).
“For glycated hemoglobin, the least-squares mean level at 13 weeks was lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group by 0.31 percentage points (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.37)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Any serious adverse event had a hazard ratio of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.97).
“Any serious adverse event 737/2200 806/2197 145.2 164.4 0.87 (0.79-0.97)NA”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The least-squares mean change in the estimated GFR slope was less in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group (-3.19±0.15 vs. -4.71±0.15 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 per year), for a between-group difference of 1.52 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 per year (95% CI 1.11-1.93).
“The least-squares mean (±SE) change in the estimated GFR slope was less in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group (-3.19±0.15 vs. -4.71±0.15ml per minute per 1.73 m 2 per year), for a between-group difference of 1.52 ml per minute per 1.73 m 2 per year (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.93)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Diastolic blood pressure was lower in the canagliflozin group by 0.95 mm Hg (95% CI 0.61-1.28).
“diastolic blood pressure (by 0.95 mm Hg; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.28)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Body weight was lower in the canagliflozin group by 0.80 kg (95% CI 0.69-0.92).
“and body weight (by 0.80 kg; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.92).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Patients in the canagliflozin group had a lower risk of end-stage kidney disease than those in the placebo group.
“Patients in the canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of endstage kidney disease, hospitalization for heart failure, and the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Serious adverse event related to trial drug had a hazard ratio of 1.45 (95% CI 0.98-2.14).
“Serious adverse event related to trial drug 62/2200 42/2197 12.2 8.6 1.45 (0.98-2.14)NA”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Any adverse event had a hazard ratio of 0.87 (95% CI 0.82-0.93) in the canagliflozin group compared with placebo.
“Any adverse event 1784/2200 1860/2197 351.4 379.3 0.87 (0.82-0.93)NA”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Dialysis initiated or kidney transplantation had a hazard ratio of 0.74 (95% CI 0.55-1.00).
“Dialysis initiated or kidney transplantation 76/2202 100/2199 13.3 17.7 0.74 (0.55-1.00)NA”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The geometric mean of the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio was lower by 31% (95% CI 26-35) on average during follow-up in the canagliflozin group.
“The geometric mean of the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio was lower by 31% (95% CI, 26 to 35) on average during follow-up in the canagliflozin group”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The hazard ratio for death from any cause was 0.83 (95% CI 0.68-1.02).
“The hazard ratio for death from any cause was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.02)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The hazard ratio for the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure or unstable angina was 0.74 (95% CI 0.63-0.86).
“for the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure or unstable angina, the hazard ratio was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.86)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The exploratory outcome of dialysis, kidney transplantation, or renal death had a hazard ratio of 0.72 (95% CI 0.54-0.97).
“the exploratory outcome of dialysis, kidney transplantation, or renal death (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.97)”
- Also stated in: § Secondary and Exploratory Outcomes · plain
“Dialysis, kidney transplantation, or renal death † 78/2202 105/2199 13.6 18.6 0.72 (0.54-0.97)NA”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Secondary and Exploratory Outcomes · plain
- Findingown data
The effects were consistent across renal components, including the doubling of the serum creatinine level (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.48-0.76; P<0.001).
“The effects were also consistent across renal components, including the doubling of the serum creatinine level (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.76; P<0.001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The relative risk of the renal-specific composite of end-stage kidney disease, doubling of creatinine, or death from renal causes was 34% lower in the canagliflozin group (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.53-0.81; P<0.001).
“The relative risk of the renal-specific composite of end-stage kidney disease, a doubling of the creatinine level, or death from renal causes was lower by 34% (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.81; P<0.001)”
- Also stated in: § Secondary and Exploratory Outcomes · plain
“The relative risk of the composite of end-stage kidney disease, doubling of the serum creatinine level, or renal death was lower by 34% in the canagliflozin group (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.81; P<0.001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Secondary and Exploratory Outcomes · plain
- Findingown data
Patients in the canagliflozin group had a lower risk of the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.57-0.83; P<0.001).
“including the composites of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.83; P<0.001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The between-group differences in blood glucose level, weight, and blood pressure were very modest.
“These findings were observed despite very modest between-group differences in blood glucose level, weight, and blood pressure and in contrast to previous concern about the initial acute reduction in the estimated GFR observed with SGLT2 inhibitors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The trial population was at high risk for cardiovascular outcomes, with cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure occurring in 13.8% of the population over a median of 2.62 years of follow-up.
“Our trial population was also at high risk for cardiovascular outcomes, with cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure occurring in 13.8% of the population over a median of 2.62 years of follow-up.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The rates of amputation and fracture observed with canagliflozin and placebo were similar.
“The similar rates of amputation and fracture that we observed with canagliflozin and placebo are reassuring and consistent with trials of other SGLT2 inhibitors 6,7,20 but differ from the CANVAS Program findings.5”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Among 1000 patients treated for 2.5 years, there would be 24 fewer end-stage kidney disease events (NNT 43; 95% CI 26 to 121).
“and 24 fewer end-stage kidneydisease events (NNT, 43; 95% CI, 26 to 121).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The baseline characteristics of the patients were similar in the two groups.
“The baseline characteristics of the patients were similar in the two groups (Table 1, and Tables S1 and S2 in the Supplementary Appendix).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These results indicate that canagliflozin may be an effective treatment option for renal and cardiovascular protection in patients with type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease.
“These results indicate that canagliflozin may be an effective treatment option for renal and cardiovascular protection in patients with type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Among 1000 patients treated for 2.5 years, there would be 36 fewer composite renal outcomes of end-stage kidney disease, doubling of the serum creatinine level, or renal death (NNT 28; 95% CI 19 to 54).
“including 36 fewer composite renal outcomes of end-stage kidney disease, doubling of the serum creatinine level, or renal death (NNT, 28; 95% CI, 19 to 54)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
On the basis of trial data, among 1000 patients treated for 2.5 years, the primary composite outcome of end-stage kidney disease, doubling of the serum creatinine level, or renal or cardiovascular death would occur in 47 fewer patients in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group (NNT 22; 95% CI 15 to 38).
“On the basis of our trial data, we estimate that among 1000 patients in our trial treated for 2.5 years, the primary composite outcome of endstage kidney disease, doubling of the serum creatinine level, or renal or cardiovascular death would occur in 47 fewer patients in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group (number needed to treat [NNT], 22; 95% CI, 15 to 38)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The reduction in hospitalization for heart failure seen in this trial is consistent with results of other trials of SGLT2 inhibitors.
“The reduction in hospitalization for heart failure seen in our trial is consistent with results of other trials of SGLT2 inhibitors.[5][6][7]18,19”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5][6][7]18,19
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The precision of the effect and consistency with previous large trials of SGLT2 inhibitors suggest that the early stopping limitation is unlikely to have a major effect on the findings.
“However, the precision of the effect and the consistency with the findings of previous large trials of SGLT2 inhibitors suggest that this limitation is unlikely to have a major effect on our findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The overall safety profile in this trial is otherwise consistent with the known adverse effects associated with canagliflozin.
“The overall safety profile in our trial is otherwise consistent with the known adverse effects associated with canagliflozin.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
- May combine two claims. 17
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial showed that empagliflozin was superior to placebo.
“The EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial also showed that empagliflozin was superior to placebo, 6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] 6. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2117-28. source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe similar rates of amputation and fracture are consistent with trials of other SGLT2 inhibitors but differ from the CANVAS Program findings.
“The similar rates of amputation and fracture that we observed with canagliflozin and placebo are reassuring and consistent with trials of other SGLT2 inhibitors 6,7,20 but differ from the CANVAS Program findings.5”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [6] 6. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2117-28. source
The Safety and Adverse Events section (p. 7) reports similar bone-fracture rates with empagliflozin and placebo, supporting the fracture comparison. Our copy does not report amputation rates, so it does not establish the amputation comparison. The CANVAS comparison is attached to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [7] 7. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 347-57. source
- cites [20] 20. Inzucchi SE, Iliev H, Pfarr E, Zinman B. Empagliflozin and assessment of lower- limb amputations in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Diabetes Care 2018; 41(1): e4-e5. source
- cites [5] 5. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and re- nal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 644-57. source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe significantly lower rates of cardiovascular outcomes, including the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, in the canagliflozin group are consistent with those observed with canagliflozin in the CANVAS Program, despite smaller differences in glycemic control.
“The significantly lower rates of cardiovascular outcomes, including the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, in the canagliflozin group in our trial are consistent with those observed with canagliflozin in the CANVAS (Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study) Program, 5 despite the smaller differences in glycemic control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] 5. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and re- nal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 644-57. source
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe observed benefits were obtained on a background of renin-angiotensin system blockade, the only approved renoprotective medications in type 2 diabetes.
“The observed benefits were obtained on a background of renin-angiotensin system blockade, the only approved renoprotective medications in type 2 diabetes, a factor that highlights the clinical significance of the findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRates of diabetic ketoacidosis were low but higher in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group (2.2 vs. 0.2 per 1000 patient-years).
“Rates of diabetic ketoacidosis were low but higher in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group (2.2 vs. 0.2 per 1000 patient-years)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRates of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar overall in the canagliflozin group and the placebo group.
“Rates of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar overall in the canagliflozin group and the placebo group (Table 2, and Tables S4 and S5 in the Supplementary Appendix).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was no significant difference in the risk of lower-limb amputation, with rates of 12.3 versus 11.2 per 1000 patient-years in the canagliflozin group and the placebo group, respectively (HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.79-1.56).
“There was no significant difference in the risk of lowerlimb amputation, with rates of 12.3 versus 11.2 per 1000 patient-years in the canagliflozin group and the placebo group, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.56).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPatients who received canagliflozin, including those with reduced estimated GFR at baseline, had a lower risk of the primary outcome overall than those in the placebo group, as well as less end-stage kidney disease.
“In addition, we found that patients who received canagliflozin (including those who had a reduced estimated GFR at baseline) had a lower risk of the primary outcome overall than those in the placebo group, as well as less end-stage kidney disease.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSubgroup analyses were assessed by tests for the interaction between trial group and subgroup in stratified Cox proportional-hazards models without adjustment for multiple testing.
“Subgroup analyses were assessed by tests for the interaction between the trial group and the subgroup in stratified Cox proportionalhazards models without adjustment for multiple testing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenA single interim analysis was to be conducted by an independent data monitoring committee after the primary outcome had occurred in 405 patients.
“A single interim analysis was to be conducted by an independent data monitoring committee after the primary outcome had occurred in 405 patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn the intention-to-treat population, a stratified Cox proportional-hazards model was used to analyze the primary and secondary outcomes according to category of estimated GFR at screening.
“In the intention-to-treat population, we used a stratified Cox proportional-hazards model to analyze the primary and secondary outcomes, according to the category of estimated GFR at screening.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAt the trial conclusion at a median follow-up of 2.62 years, 1201 patients (27.3%) in the two groups had discontinued therapy, and the rate of adherence to the trial regimen was 84% during follow-up.
“At the trial conclusion at a median follow-up of 2.62 years (range, 0.02 to 4.53), 1201 patients (27.3%) in the two groups had discontinued therapy (Table S3 and Figs.S1 and S2 in the Supplementary Appendix); the rate of adherence to the trial regimen was 84% during follow-up.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAnalyses were performed by the sponsor and independently confirmed at George Clinical with the use of original data.
“Analyses were performed by the sponsor and independently con-firmed at George Clinical with the use of original data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenPrespecified stopping guidance proposed possible recommendation of early cessation if clear evidence of benefit was observed for the primary outcome (P<0.01) and the composite of end-stage kidney disease or death from renal or cardiovascular causes (P<0.025), with consideration of overall balance of risks and benefits.
“Prespecified stopping guidance that was provided to the data monitoring committee by the steering committee proposed possible recommendation of early cessation if clear evidence of benefit was observed for the primary outcome (P<0.01) and the composite of end-stage kidney disease or death from renal or cardiovascular causes (P<0.025), with consideration of the overall balance of risks and benefits”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataBecause there was no significant between-group difference in cardiovascular death, the differences in all subsequent outcomes in the hierarchical testing sequence were not formally tested.
“so the differences in all subsequent outcomes in the hierarchical testing sequence were not formally tested.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationown dataCanagliflozin treatment would prevent 25 composite events of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke per 1000 patients over 2.5 years (NNT 40; 95% CI 23 to 165).
“and 25 composite events of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (NNT, 40; 95% CI, 23 to 165).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe trial was designed to be event-driven, with enrollment of at least 4200 patients (844 events) required to provide 90% power to detect a risk of the primary outcome that was 20% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group at an alpha level of 0.045 after adjustment for one interim analysis.
“The trial was designed to be event-driven, with the enrollment of at least 4200 patients (844 events) required to provide a power of 90% to detect a risk of the primary outcome that was 20% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group at an alpha level of 0.045 after adjustment for one interim analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAll renal and cardiovascular outcomes that were part of the primary and secondary outcomes, as well as key safety outcomes, were adjudicated by independent adjudication committees whose members were unaware of trial-group assignments.
“All renal and cardiovascular outcomes that were part of the primary and secondary outcomes, as well as key safety outcomes (fractures, pancreatitis, ketoacidosis, and renal-cell carcinoma), were adjudicated by independent adjudication committees whose members were unaware of trial-group assignments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningSecondary outcomes were tested at a two-sided level of 0.038 to account for type I error inflation in the group sequential design.
“the secondary outcomes would be tested at a two-sided level of 0.038, to account for type I error inflation in the group sequential design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataPatients were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion (1:1) to receive canagliflozin or matching placebo with the use of randomly permuted blocks, with stratification according to category of estimated GFR at screening.
“The patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion (1:1) to receive either canagliflozin (100 mg orally once daily) or matching placebo with the use of randomly permuted blocks, with stratification according to the category of estimated GFR (30 to <45 ml, 45 to <60 ml, or 60 to <90 ml per minute per 1.73 m 2 ) at screening.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataA total of 4361 patients (99.1%) were either alive with follow-up at the end of the trial or had died before the final follow-up visit, and vital status was ascertained for all but 6 patients (4395 [99.9%]).
“A total of 4361 patients (99.1%) were either alive with follow-up at the end of the trial or had died before the final follow-up visit.Consent was withdrawn by 16 patients (0.4%), and vital status was ascertained for all but 6 patients (4395 [99.9%]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe trial was stopped early after a planned interim analysis on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee.
“The trial was stopped early after a planned interim analysis on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn contrast to completed cardiovascular outcome trials of SGLT2 inhibitors, this trial included a population at high risk for kidney failure and had a primary outcome of major renal end points.
“In contrast to completed cardiovascular outcome trials of SGLT2 inhibitors, [5][6][7] our trial included a population at high risk for kidney failure and had a primary outcome of major renal end points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5][6][7]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAnalyses for fracture, renal-cell carcinoma, acute pancreatitis, and diabetic ketoacidosis were based on confirmed and adjudicated results.
“The analyses for fracture, renal-cell carcinoma, acute pancreatitis, and diabetic ketoacidosis were based on confirmed and adjudicated results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe trial was stopped early at a planned interim analysis, which may have limited the power for some secondary outcomes and may increase the risk of overestimating effect sizes.
“First, the trial was stopped early at a planned interim analysis, which may have limited the power for some secondary outcomes and may increase the risk of overestimating effect sizes.21”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] 21. Guyatt GH, Briel M, Glasziou P, Bassler D, Montori VM. Problems of stop- ping trials early. BMJ 2012; 344: e3863. source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe trial excluded patients with very advanced kidney disease (estimated GFR <30 ml per minute per 1.73 m2), nonalbuminuric or microalbuminuric disease, and kidney diseases believed due to conditions other than type 2 diabetes, so it is not known whether the findings can be generalized to such populations.
“Third, we excluded patients who had very advanced kidney disease (estimated GFR, <30 ml per minute per 1.73 m 2 ), nonalbuminuric or microalbuminuric disease, and kidney diseases believed to be due to conditions other than type 2 diabetes, so it is not known whether the findings can be generalized to such populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll potential ketone-related events were adjudicated for diabetic ketoacidosis by an independent adjudication committee on the basis of clinical presentation and predefined biochemical measures.
“All potential ketone-related events were adjudicated for diabetic ketoacidosis by an independent adjudication committee on the basis of clinical presentation and predefined biochemical measures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe mechanism of benefit of canagliflozin is likely to be independent of glucose levels and may possibly stem from a reduction in intraglomerular pressure.
“This suggests that the mechanism of benefit is likely to be independent of glucose levels and may possibly stem from a reduction in intraglomerular pressure, [11][12][13] with other possible mechanisms presently being studied.[14][15][16][17]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11][12][13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe trial did not measure off-treatment estimated GFR levels among patients who completed the trial, so differences in estimated GFR at the end of the trial are probably underestimations.
“Second, we did not measure off-treatment estimated GFR levels among the patients who had completed the trial, so the differences in the estimated GFR values at the end of the trial are probably underestimations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
During CREDENCE trial recruitment, an amendment was introduced excluding those at risk for amputation.
“However, during the CREDENCE trial recruitment, an amendment was introduced, excluding those at risk for amputation.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The Trial Procedures section confirms a May 2016 amendment concerning amputation risk, but describes a different measure: foot examinations at each visit and temporary interruption of treatment for patients with an active condition that might lead to amputation. It does not describe excluding such patients during recruitment. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSGLT2 inhibitors and finerenone reduce albuminuria in clinical trials of advanced diabetic kidney disease.
“SGLT2 inhibitors and finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, also reduce albuminuria in clinical trials of advanced diabetic kidney disease (471-473).”
From Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus (2023) · cites this paper as [471]
The Effect on Intermediate Outcomes section reports that urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio was 31% lower with canagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, than with placebo during follow-up. The Methods describe patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease, but the paper does not report a finerenone trial; it also says patients with very advanced kidney disease (estimated GFR below 30) were excluded. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn CREDENCE, canagliflozin reduced the risk of the secondary cardiovascular outcome of hospitalization for heart failure by 39% (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.47-0.80).
“canagli fl ozin reduced the risk of the secondary cardiovascular outcomes of hospitalization for heart failure and MACE by 39% (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.47 -0.80)”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The Secondary and Exploratory Outcomes section reports a 39% lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure with canagliflozin (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.47–0.80), supporting the quoted claim. But the citing sentence also applies that figure to MACE; the paper reports HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.67–0.95) for the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSGLT2i conferred less annual eGFR decline and a reduction in albuminuria or decreased progression to severely increased albuminuria.
“SGLT2i conferred less annual eGFR decline and a reduction in albuminuria or decreased progression to severely increased albuminuria.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The Effect on Intermediate Outcomes section reports a slower annual eGFR decline and a 31% lower urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio with canagliflozin than with placebo. The trial studied one SGLT2 inhibitor in patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease; it does not establish these effects for the entire drug class or other populations. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the CREDENCE and DAPA-CKD trials, kidney outcomes were the primary outcome evaluated.
“Of note, in the CREDENCE and DAPA-CKD trials, kidney outcomes were the primary outcome evaluated.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The Outcomes section identifies a kidney-focused composite as CREDENCE’s primary outcome, including end-stage kidney disease, doubling of serum creatinine, or renal or cardiovascular death. This paper does not establish the primary outcome of DAPA-CKD, so it supports only the CREDENCE part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
In CREDENCE, for the secondary outcome of dialysis, kidney transplant, or death from kidney causes, there was evidence for significant benefit (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.54-0.97).
“Even for the secondary outcome of dialysis, kidney transplant, or death from kidney causes, there was evidence for signi fi cant bene fi t (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54 -0.97).”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The Effect on the Primary Outcome and Renal Components section reports a benefit for dialysis, kidney transplantation, or renal death with HR 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54–0.97), a confidence interval that excludes 1. However, it explicitly calls this an exploratory outcome, not a secondary outcome. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe evidence is particularly strong for the population corresponding to the CREDENCE and DAPA-CKD studies (ACR >200-300 mg/g and eGFR >25-30 and <75-90 ml/min per 1.73 m2).
“Thus, the evidence is particularly strong for the population corresponding to the CREDENCE and DAPACKD studies (ACR > 200 -300 mg/g [ > 20 -30 mg/mmol] and eGFR > 25 -30 and < 75 -90 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 .”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The Patients section (page not available) identifies this paper as the CREDENCE trial and gives its eligibility thresholds: ACR >300 to 5000 mg/g and eGFR 30 to <90 ml/min/1.73 m². The Results section reports a significant renal benefit in that population. This paper does not establish the DAPA-CKD population or the combined lower thresholds of ACR >200 mg/g and eGFR >25 ml/min/1.73 m². (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn CREDENCE, a drop in eGFR ≥30% was uncommon (4% of participants assigned to canagliflozin) but was associated with modestly increased risks of kidney adverse events.
“In CREDENCE, a drop in eGFR $ 30% was uncommon (4% of participants assigned to canagli fl ozin) but was associated with modestly increased risks of kidney adverse events.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The Effect on Intermediate Outcomes section reports an initial eGFR reduction in the canagliflozin group. It does not report that 4% of participants had a drop of at least 30%, and the Effects on Safety Outcomes section does not link such drops to kidney adverse events. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredProtocols of multiple RCTs, including CREDENCE and DAPA-CKD, specified continuation of study drug (active or placebo) even when observed eGFR dropped below the eligibility threshold specified for initiation.
“Protocols of multiple RCTs, including CREDENCE and DAPA-CKD, speci fi ed continuation of study drug (active or placebo) even when observed eGFR dropped below the eligibility threshold speci fi ed for initiation.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The Patients section sets CREDENCE’s entry eGFR threshold at 30 ml/min/1.73 m², and Trial Procedures says canagliflozin or placebo was to continue until specified events such as dialysis or trial completion; falling below the entry threshold is not listed as a stopping event. This supports the CREDENCE part, but this paper does not establish what the DAPA-CKD protocol specified. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe eGFR ≥57% decrease outcome was selected because it is a classic outcome in diabetic nephropathy studies and is a more robust kidney failure surrogate outcome than a ≥40% decrease in eGFR, particularly when initial changes in eGFR occur.
“However, a sustained ≥57% decrease in eGFR (equivalent to doubling of serum creatinine) was selected in FIDELITY because it is a classic outcome in diabetic nephropathy studies2 , 12–14 and is a more robust kidney failure surrogate outcome than a ≥40% decrease in eGFR, particularly when initial changes in eGFR occur.14 , 15”
From Cardiovascular and kidney outcomes with finerenone in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: the FIDELITY pooled analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
The Outcomes section uses a sustained doubling of serum creatinine as a primary kidney-outcome component in a diabetic nephropathy trial, supporting the claim that this is an established type of outcome. The paper does not compare that outcome with a ≥40% eGFR decrease or say it is a more robust surrogate when initial eGFR changes occur. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPrevious studies assessing SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes, such as CREDENCE or DAPA-CKD, included patient populations representing a substantially smaller part of the CKD spectrum than the FIDELITY analysis.
“Previous studies assessing SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes, such as CREDENCE or DAPA-CKD, included patient populations representing a substantially smaller part of the CKD spectrum than the FIDELITY analysis.”
From Cardiovascular and kidney outcomes with finerenone in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: the FIDELITY pooled analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
The Methods passage identifies CREDENCE as an SGLT2-inhibitor trial in patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuric CKD, with specified kidney-function and albuminuria ranges. The paper also says it excluded several other CKD groups. It does not assess DAPA-CKD or compare either trial’s coverage of the CKD spectrum with FIDELITY, so the comparative claim is not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWhile glucose-lowering effects of SGLT2 inhibitors are blunted with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73m2, kidney and cardiovascular benefits were still seen at eGFR levels as low as 20 mL/min/1.73m2 even with no significant change in glucose.
“while the glucose-lowering effects of SGLT2 inhibitors are blunted with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73m 2 , the kidney and cardiovascular benefits were still seen at eGFR levels as low as 20 mL/min/ 1.73 m 2 even with no significant change in glucose (4,29,31,107,123,127,129,130).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
The Discussion reports kidney and cardiovascular benefits with canagliflozin despite modest differences in blood glucose, including among patients with reduced baseline eGFR. But the Methods enrolled patients with eGFR of 30 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m², and the paper says it excluded those below 30; it cannot establish benefits at 20. The Effect on Intermediate Outcomes section also reports a small but statistically significant difference in glycated hemoglobin, rather than no significant glucose change. Our copy does not establish the claimed blunting threshold of <45. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe patient populations in this trial and the CREDENCE trial differed.
“First, the patient populations differed in the two trials”
From Effect of finerenone on chronic kidney disease outcomes in type 2 diabetes (2020) · cites this paper as [4]
The introduction (page not supplied) describes CREDENCE patients as having type 2 diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease, and contrasts them with patients in earlier trials who were at low risk for kidney failure. The Patients section gives CREDENCE baseline characteristics. But the cited paper does not identify or describe the citing document’s “this trial,” so it cannot establish that those two specific patient populations differed. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe mechanisms of action differ between drug classes, including different effects on metabolic, hemodynamic, and diuretic factors and on inflammation and fibrosis.
“the mechanisms of action differ between drug classes, including different effects on metabolic, hemodynamic, and diuretic factors and on inflammation and fibrosis.4,13,18,19”
From Effect of finerenone on chronic kidney disease outcomes in type 2 diabetes (2020) · cites this paper as [4]
The Discussion says canagliflozin’s benefit may be independent of glucose levels and may stem from reduced intraglomerular pressure. This addresses possible metabolic and hemodynamic mechanisms, but the paper does not compare mechanisms across drug classes or establish differing effects on diuresis, inflammation, and fibrosis. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSGLT2 inhibitors reduce the incidence of heart failure and improve heart failure-related outcomes, including hospitalization for heart failure and heart failure-related symptoms, in people with diabetes with preserved or reduced ejection fraction.
“SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the incidence of heart failure and improve heart failurerelated outcomes, including hospitalization for heart failure and heart failure-related symptoms, in people with diabetes with preserved or reduced ejection fraction (250,(255)(256)(257)(298)(299)(300)(301)(302)(303)(304)(305)(306).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [257]
The Secondary and Exploratory Outcomes section reports fewer hospitalizations for heart failure with canagliflozin than with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease. It does not establish reduced incidence of heart failure, improved heart-failure symptoms, or benefits specifically in people with preserved or reduced ejection fraction. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThere was an increased risk of lower-limb amputation with canagliflozin in one trial, but no significant increase in lower-limb amputations, fractures, AKI, or hyperkalemia was seen in other trials of canagliflozin.
“While there was an increased risk of lower-limb amputation with canagliflozin in one trial (247), no significant increase in lower-limb amputations, fractures, AKI, or hyperkalemia was seen in other trials of canagliflozin (248).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [248]
The Effects on Safety Outcomes section reports no significant increase in lower-limb amputation or fracture in this canagliflozin trial. The Trial Procedures section also notes that increased amputation risk had been identified in another trial, though that part of the citing sentence is attached to a different citation. Our copy does not establish the claimed absence of significant increases in acute kidney injury or hyperkalemia; the hyperkalemia passage only defines how those events were reported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredResults of large cardiovascular outcome trials of empagliflozin and canagliflozin showed that treatment with either drug reduced rates of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death.
“Results of large cardiovascular outcome trials of empagliflozin (10 mg or 25 mg daily) and canagliflozin (100 or 300 mg daily) showed that treatment with either drug reduced rates of MI, stroke, or cardiovascular death.”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [248]
The Discussion (page not provided) says the canagliflozin CANVAS results were consistent with lower rates of the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and that EMPA-REG OUTCOME showed empagliflozin was superior to placebo. This supports the main cardiovascular-outcome claim, but our copy does not establish the specific daily doses stated in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe SGLT2 inhibitors empagliflozin, canagliflozin, and dapagliflozin reduce the incidence of heart failure and improve heart failure-related outcomes, including hospitalization for heart failure and heart failure-related symptoms, in people with diabetes with preserved or reduced ejection fraction.
“The SGLT2 inhibitors empagliflozin, canagliflozin, and dapagliflozin reduce the incidence of heart failure and improve heart failure–related outcomes, including hospitalization for heart failure and heart failure–related symptoms, in people with diabetes with preserved or reduced ejection fraction (242,247,248,281,286–294).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [248]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCREDENCE and DAPA-CKD demonstrated significant benefit for composite outcomes including substantial eGFR decline, kidney failure, and mortality.
“To date, two clinical trials with primary kidney disease outcomes using canagliflozin and dapagliflozin (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation [CREDENCE] and Dapagliflozin And Prevention of Adverse outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease [DAPA-CKD]) demonstrated significant benefit for composite outcomes including end points of substantial eGFR decl”
From Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) (2022) · cites this paper as [55]
The Outcomes and Effect on the Primary Outcome and Renal Components sections report that CREDENCE significantly reduced a composite including end-stage kidney disease, doubling of serum creatinine, and renal or cardiovascular death. The paper does not report DAPA-CKD results, so it cannot support the claim about both trials. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe ability of SGLT2 inhibitors to lower glucose levels declines when the eGFR falls below 45 mL/min/1.73 m2.
“However, their ability to lower glucose levels declines when the eGFR falls below 45 mL/min/1.73m 2 (142-144).”
From 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [142]
The Effect on Intermediate Outcomes section reports that canagliflozin modestly lowered glycated hemoglobin compared with placebo. The paper uses 45 mL/min/1.73 m² as an eGFR subgroup boundary for renal outcomes, but the passages found do not show that glucose-lowering ability declines below that threshold. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the CREDENCE trial, long-term canagliflozin protected against renal and cardiovascular events among patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.
“The CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) trial showed that long-term administration of canagliflozin conferred renal and cardiovascular protection in patients with type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease.10”
From Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
Prior work, the CREDENCE trial, showed kidney-protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.
“The kidney-protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors have previously been shown in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease in the CREDENCE trial.10”
From Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
Clinical trials of other SGLT2 inhibitors have shown similar results.
“Clinical trials of other SGLT2 inhibitors have shown similar results.8,10,19”
From Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
As in other SGLT2 inhibitor trials, there was an initial dip in estimated GFR followed by stabilization of kidney-function decline.
“As in other trials of SGLT2 inhibitors, there was an initial dip in the estimated GFR, followed by a stabilization of kidney-function decline.7,8,10”
From Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
In patients with diabetic kidney disease and increased albuminuria, large placebo-controlled trials have shown that RAS inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, and finerenone each reduced the risk of progression to kidney failure.
“In patients with diabetic kidney disease with increased levels of albuminuria, large placebo-controlled trials have shown that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors,3–5 sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors,6,7 and the non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone8,9 all reduced the risk of progression to kidney failure.”
From Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
The effect of SGLT2 inhibition on kidney disease progression or cardiovascular death in EMPA-KIDNEY is quantitatively similar to that seen in two other large placebo-controlled trials in CKD populations.
“The effect of SGLT2 inhibition on kidney disease progression or cardiovascular death seen in the present trial is quantitatively similar to that seen in two other large placebo-controlled trials in CKD populations.6,7”
From Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
The CREDENCE trial of canagliflozin required all participants to have type 2 diabetes and a urinary ACR of at least 300 mg/g, and excluded patients with an eGFR of less than 30 ml per minute per 1.73 m2.
“The CREDENCE trial of canagliflozin required all participants to have type 2 diabetes and a urinary ACR of at least 300 mg/g, and excluded patients with an eGFR of less than 30 ml per minute per 1.73 m2.6”
From Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
CREDENCE was stopped early due to positive efficacy and showed a 32% risk reduction for development of ESKD over control.
“It was stopped early due to positive efficacy and showed a 32% risk reduction for development of ESKD over control (29).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
The development of the primary end point in CREDENCE was reduced by 30%.
“Additionally, the development of the primary end point, which included dialysis for $30 days, kidney transplantation or eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73m 2 sustained for $30 days by central laboratory assessment, doubling from the baseline serum creatinine average sustained for $30 days by central laboratory assessment, or renal death or cardiovascular death, was reduced by 30%.”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
In CREDENCE, there were clear benefits on cardiovascular outcomes demonstrating a 31% reduction in cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization and a 20% reduction in cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke.
“Moreover, in this advanced CKD group, there were clear benefits on cardiovascular outcomes demonstrating a 31% reduction in cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization and a 20% reduction in cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke (29,110,113).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
This benefit was on background ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy in >99% of the participants.
“This benefit was on background ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy in >99% of the participants (29).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
In 2019, the results of the CREDENCE trial were reported; it was the first study designed to specifically assess the effect of an SGLT2 inhibitor (canagliflozin) on a primary kidney outcome in people with established diabetic kidney disease.
“In 2019, the results of the CREDENCE trial 17 -the first study designed to specifically assess the effect of an SGLT2 inhibitor (canagliflozin) on a primary kidney outcome in people with established diabetic kidney disease-were reported.”
From SGLT2 inhibitors for the prevention of kidney failure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [17]
In CREDENCE, canagliflozin reduced the risk of the secondary cardiovascular outcome of MACE by 20% (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.67-0.95).
“and 20% (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.67 -0.95), respectively.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
CREDENCE was the first RCT of an SGLT2i specifically powered for primary kidney outcomes among patients with exclusively albuminuric CKD.
“which was the fi rst RCT of an SGLT2i speci fi cally powered for primary kidney outcomes among patients with exclusively albuminuric CKD.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The increased risk of lower-limb amputations seen with canagliflozin in the CANVAS trial was not reproduced in the CREDENCE trial.
“The increased risk of lower-limb amputations seen with canagli fl ozin in the CANVAS trial 87 was not reproduced in the CREDENCE trial, 93 even though this trial did implement special attention to foot care for prevention.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
In CREDENCE, the primary outcome occurred in 43.2 and 61.2 per 1000 patient-years in the canagliflozin and placebo arms respectively, translating to a 30% relative reduction in the primary kidney outcome by canagliflozin (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.59-0.82).
“The primary outcome occurred in 43.2 and 61.2 per 1000 patient-years in the canagli fl ozin and placebo arms respectively, which translated to a 30% relative reduction in the primary kidney outcome by canagli fl ozin (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.59 -0.82).”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
In the CREDENCE trial, which evaluated 100 mg/d of canagliflozin, there was no excess fracture rate.
“in the CREDENCE trial, which evaluated 100 mg/d of canagli fl ozin, there was no excess fracture rate.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
In CREDENCE, there was no evidence of heterogeneity of treatment benefit of subgroups defined by eGFR or ACR (P-interactions were nonsignificant).
“There was no evidence of heterogeneity of treatment bene fi t of subgroups de fi ned by eGFR or ACR ( P -interactions were nonsigni fi cant).”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
In the CREDENCE trial, diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in 2.2 versus 0.2 per 1000 patient-years for canagliflozin versus placebo.
“In the CREDENCE trial, this was 2.2 versus 0.2 per 1000 patient-years for canagli fl ozin versus placebo.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
Participants with T2D and an eGFR as low as 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 were included in the EMPA-REG, CANVAS, and CREDENCE trials, and efficacy and safety in these studies were consistent across both eGFR and albuminuria down to this threshold.
“Participants with T2D and an eGFR as low as 30 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 were included in the EMPA-REG, CANVAS, and CREDENCE trials, 87,90,93 and ef fi cacy and safety in these studies were consistent across both eGFR and albuminuria down to this threshold.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
Patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes have high residual cardiorenal morbidity and mortality, despite current therapies.
“Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes have high residual cardiorenal morbidity and mortality, despite current therapies,1–5”
From Cardiovascular and kidney outcomes with finerenone in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: the FIDELITY pooled analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
In CREDENCE, there was a 31% reduction in cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization and a 20% reduction in cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke.
“there were clear benefits on cardiovascular outcomes demonstrating a 31% reduction in cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization and a 20% reduction in cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke (29,125,126).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
In CREDENCE, the primary composite end point was reduced by 30% with canagliflozin.
“Additionally, the development of the primary end point, which included dialysis for ≥30 days, kidney transplantation or eGFR <15 mL/min/ 1.73 m 2 sustained for ≥30 days by central laboratory assessment, doubling from the baseline serum creatinine average sustained for ≥30 days by central laboratory assessment, or kidney death or cardiovascular death, was reduced by 30%.”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
CREDENCE was stopped early due to positive efficacy and showed a 32% risk reduction for development of kidney failure over placebo.
“It was stopped early due to positive efficacy and showed a 32% risk reduction for development of kidney failure over placebo (29).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
In CREDENCE, the benefit was on background ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy in >99% of participants.
“This benefit was on background ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy in >99% of the participants (29).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
The magnitude of the between-group difference in the risk of a primary outcome event in this trial was smaller than that shown for canagliflozin in the CREDENCE trial.
“The magnitude of the between-group difference in the risk of a primary outcome event was smaller than that shown for the SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin in the Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) trial.4”
From Effect of finerenone on chronic kidney disease outcomes in type 2 diabetes (2020) · cites this paper as [4]
The CREDENCE trial excluded patients treated with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists.
“the CREDENCE trial excluded patients treated with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists”
From Effect of finerenone on chronic kidney disease outcomes in type 2 diabetes (2020) · cites this paper as [4]
In the CREDENCE trial, canagliflozin showed a 39% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure in a population with CKD and albuminuria.
“Additional data from the CREDENCE trial with canagliflozin showed a 39% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure and a 31% reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, in a population with CKD and albuminuria (UACR >300-5,000 mg/g) (257).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [257]
In the CREDENCE trial, canagliflozin showed a 31% reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure in a population with CKD and albuminuria.
“Additional data from the CREDENCE trial with canagliflozin showed a 39% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure and a 31% reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, in a population with CKD and albuminuria (UACR >300-5,000 mg/g) (257).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [257]
SGLT2 inhibitors have not been found to promote AKI in randomized controlled trials of advanced kidney disease or high cardiovascular risk with normal kidney function.
“There was concern that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may promote AKI through volume depletion, particularly when combined with diuretics or other medications that reduce glomerular filtration; however, this has not been found to be true in randomized controlled trials of advanced kidney disease (29) or high CVD risk with normal kidney function (30)(31)(32).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
The Methods describe a randomized canagliflozin trial in patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease, which is the setting for which this citation is offered. The Effects on Safety Outcomes section reports overall adverse-event rates but does not report whether acute kidney injury was more frequent with canagliflozin. Searches for “acute kidney injury” and “acute renal failure” found no passage resolving that claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the CREDENCE trial, genital mycotic infections occurred in 2.27% of canagliflozin-treated patients versus 0.59% of placebo-treated patients.
“In the CREDENCE trial, which was conducted in a population of patients with exclusively T2D and CKD, this occurred in 2.27% of those in the canagli fl ozin arm versus 0.59% of those receiving placebo.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The Effects on Safety Outcomes section reports several adverse events but does not give genital mycotic infection rates. Searches of our copy for “genital,” “mycotic infection,” and the percentages 2.27% and 0.59% found no passage verifying those figures; no page number was available for the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe ERT identified 25 relevant RCTs in an updated Cochrane systematic review.
“Additionally, the ERT identi fi ed 25 relevant RCTs in an updated Cochrane systematic review.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
The Trial Design and Oversight section describes a single randomized trial, not an updated Cochrane systematic review. Searches for an ERT, a Cochrane review, and 25 relevant RCTs found no passage addressing the claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredConcern that SGLT2 inhibitors may promote AKI through volume depletion has not been found to be true in randomized controlled trials of advanced kidney disease or high CVD risk with normal kidney function.
“There was concern that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may promote AKI through volume depletion, particularly when combined with diuretics or other medications that reduce glomerular filtration; however, this has not been found to be true in randomized controlled trials of advanced kidney disease (29) or high CVD risk with normal kidney function (30)(31)(32).”
From 11. Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
The Methods describe a randomized trial in patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease, and Effects on Safety Outcomes reports similar overall adverse-event rates. But our copy does not report an acute kidney injury comparison or assess whether volume depletion, including with diuretics, increased that risk (searched: acute kidney injury, volume depletion, diuretics, and acute renal failure). (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the three kidney outcomes trials examining SGLT2 inhibitors, the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists was rare, below 5%.
“In the three kidney outcomes trials examining SGLT2i, the use of GLP-1 RAs was rare, below 5%12–14.”
From Effects of semaglutide with and without concomitant SGLT2 inhibitor use in participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease in the FLOW trial (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
The Methods and Patients sections identify CREDENCE as a kidney-outcomes trial of an SGLT2 inhibitor, but the baseline characteristics shown in our copy do not report GLP-1 receptor agonist use. Searches for GLP-1 receptor agonists, baseline use, and the below-5% figure found no passage establishing that rate for CREDENCE or the three trials. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLittle is known about the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on the broad spectrum of both inpatient and outpatient worsening heart failure events, because these were not documented in trials with these drugs in type 2 diabetes.
“Little is known about the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on the broad spectrum of both inpatient and outpatient worsening heart failure events, because these were not documented in trials with these drugs in type 2 diabetes.1–5”
From Effect of Empagliflozin on the Clinical Stability of Patients With Heart Failure and a Reduced Ejection Fraction: The EMPEROR-Reduced Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [4]
SGLT2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of hospitalizations for heart failure in 8 large-scale trials, including those focused on type 2 diabetes, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and chronic kidney disease.
“Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of hospitalizations for heart failure in 8 large-scale trials, including those that focused on type 2 diabetes, heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction, and chronic kidney disease.1–8”
From Effect of Empagliflozin on the Clinical Stability of Patients With Heart Failure and a Reduced Ejection Fraction: The EMPEROR-Reduced Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [4]
Even with guideline-recommended treatment, residual cardiovascular and kidney risk remains despite trials showing efficacy of lifestyle and pharmacological interventions.
“Despite the fact that clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of these lifestyle and pharmacological interventions (3–10), residual cardiovascular (CV) and kidney risk remains present even with guideline-recommended treatment (8,10).”
Even with current therapies available, patients with T2DM and CKD still experience significant cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality.
“Even with current therapies available [6–10], patients with T2DM and chronic kidney disease (CKD) still experience a significant cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality.”
SGLT2 inhibitors have been studied in patients with CKD with or without T2D in three completed primary kidney outcome trials (CREDENCE, DAPA-CKD, and EMPA-KIDNEY), which showed benefit for significant reduction in primary kidney outcomes and cardiovascular outcomes.
“Furthermore, SGLT2i have been studied specifically among patients with CKD with or without T2D in 3 completed primary kidney outcome trials (CREDENCE[15], DAPA-CKD[16], and EMPA-KIDNEY[17]), which showed benefit for both a significant reduction in the primary kidney outcomes and cardiovascular outcomes [18,19].”
From Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in diabetic kidney disease: a review of their kidney and heart protection (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
In contrast to GLP1-RA, SGLT2i have had 3 dedicated kidney outcome trials that specifically enrolled a CKD population.
“This is in contrast to SGLT2i where there have been 3 dedicated kidney outcome trials that specifically enrolled a CKD population.”
From Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in diabetic kidney disease: a review of their kidney and heart protection (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
In patients with chronic kidney disease at high risk of heart failure, a consistent risk reduction of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization was observed ranging from 23% to 31%.
“In these patients at high risk of HF, a consistent risk reduction of CV death or HF hospitalization was observed ranging from 23% to 31%.150,153,542,543”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
SGLT2 inhibitors, compared with placebo, were associated with more new-onset atrial fibrillation cases in EMPA-REG OUTCOME, but fewer incident atrial fibrillation cases in CANVAS and DECLARE-TIMI 58.
“SGLT2 inhibitors, compared with placebo, were associated with more new-onset AF cases in EMPA-REG OUTCOME (empagliflozin vs. placebo), but fewer incident AF cases in CANVAS (canagliflozin vs. placebo) and DECLARE-TIMI 58 (dapagliflozin vs. placebo).71,151,153,603”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
Combining renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and SGLT2 inhibitors does not appear to cause hyperkalaemia.
“Combining RAS and SGLT2 inhibitors does not appear to cause hyperkalaemia, and a hypothesis has been raised that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of severe hyperkalaemia among MRA users with HF. 153,542,710,723,724,727,728”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
Combining an SGLT2 inhibitor with an ACE inhibitor or ARB has clear beneficial effects on risk of kidney failure and hospitalization for heart failure in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.
“In contrast, combining an SGLT2 inhibitor with an ACE-I or ARB has clear beneficial effects on risk of kidney failure and hospitalization for HF in patients with CKD and T2DM.153,542”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
Information on the safety and efficacy of combining mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists with SGLT2 inhibitors in chronic kidney disease is limited as only about 4% of FIDELIO-DKD, about 8% of FIGARO-DKD, about 5% of DAPA-CKD, and no CREDENCE participants were prescribed such a combination.
“Information on the safety and efficacy of combining MRAs with SGLT2 inhibitors in CKD is limited as only ∼4% of FIDELIO-DKD, ∼8% of FIGARO-DKD, ∼5% of DAPA-CKD, and no CREDENCE participants were prescribed such a combination.153,718,719,721”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
The CREDENCE, DAPA-CKD, and EMPA-KIDNEY placebo-controlled trials were all stopped early for efficacy while testing canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and empagliflozin, respectively.
“The CREDENCE, DAPA-CKD, and EMPA-KIDNEY placebo-controlled trials were all stopped early for efficacy while testing canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and empagliflozin, respectively.153,543,711”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
A hypothesis has been raised that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of severe hyperkalaemia among mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist users with heart failure.
“Combining RAS and SGLT2 inhibitors does not appear to cause hyperkalaemia, and a hypothesis has been raised that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of severe hyperkalaemia among MRA users with HF. 153,542,710,723,724,727,728”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
All three trials found the relative risk reductions for kidney disease progression were unmodified by baseline eGFR, with EMPA-KIDNEY reporting clear benefits in patients with eGFR 20-30 mL/min/1.73 m2.
“All three trials found the RR reductions for kidney disease progression were unmodified by baseline eGFR, with EMPA-KIDNEY reporting clear benefits in patients with eGFR 20-30 mL/min/1.73m 2 .153,542,543,712,713”
From 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. (2023) · cites this paper as [153]
Large trials have shown that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of kidney disease progression in patients with type 2 diabetes and proteinuric chronic kidney disease.
“Large trials have also shown that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of kidney disease progression in patients with type 2 diabetes and proteinuric chronic kidney disease,1, 6, 7, 8”
CREDENCE and SCORED exclusively studied patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.
“CREDENCE and SCORED exclusively studied patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes,7, 9”
Individual trials have shown that kidney benefits translate into important reductions in the need for dialysis or kidney transplantation.
“Individual trials have shown that kidney benefits translate into important reductions in the need for dialysis or kidney transplantation”
A total of 489 kidney disease progression outcomes accrued in those with an eGFR less than 30 mL/min per 1·73 m2 in EMPA-KIDNEY and DAPA-CKD.
“A total of 489 kidney disease progression outcomes accrued in those with an eGFR less than 30 mL/min per 1·73 m2 in those two trials.”
Efficacy and safety data from EMPA-KIDNEY and DAPA-CKD combined include information on nearly 3000 patients with an eGFR of 20-30 mL/min per 1·73 m2.
“efficacy and safety data from EMPA-KIDNEY and DAPA-CKD combined include information on nearly 3000 patients with an eGFR of 20–30 mL/min per 1·73 m2.”
Relatively modest blood pressure reductions with SGLT2 inhibition are unlikely to fully explain the substantial risk reductions in kidney failure and cardiovascular outcomes with these agents.
“Regardless of the underlying mechanisms, relatively modest reductions in BP with SGLT2 inhibition are unlikely to fully explain the substantial risk reductions in kidney failure and cardiovascular outcomes with these agents, 9,[35][36][37] a conclusion supported by the finding that less than 10% of treatment effects on kidney and cardiovascular outcomes were explained by change in systolic BP.”
From Blood Pressure Effects of Canagliflozin and Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: Insights From the CREDENCE Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Analyses of change in systolic blood pressure were based on-treatment using complete data, as pre-specified.
“Analyses of change in systolic BP were based on-treatment analyses using complete data, as pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan and to be consistent with the primary trial report.9”
From Blood Pressure Effects of Canagliflozin and Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: Insights From the CREDENCE Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
In CREDENCE, canagliflozin reduced kidney failure risk by 30% and heart failure hospitalization risk by 40% in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.
“In the Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) Trial, canagliflozin reduced the risk of kidney failure and of hospitalization for heart failure in patients with T2DM and CKD by 30 and 40% respectively.9”
From Blood Pressure Effects of Canagliflozin and Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: Insights From the CREDENCE Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
The kidney benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors appear largely independent of glycemic control.
“The kidney benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors appear to be largely independent of glycemic control based on a growing series of observations.”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
CREDENCE was the first trial to show superiority of an SGLT2 inhibitor added to standard care for CKD in type 2 diabetes for a primary outcome of kidney disease endpoints.
“These collective findings were subsequently proven by the CREDENCE trial, the first to show superiority of an SGLT2 inhibitor added to the standard of care for CKD in T2DM for a primary outcome of kidney disease end points (14).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
Kidney protection is consistent and substantial in patients with baseline eGFR below 45 mL/min/1.73 m2.
“Nevertheless, kidney protection is consistent and substantial in this population (14).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
SGLT2 inhibitor glucose-lowering effects are modest, especially when baseline eGFR is below 45 mL/min/1.73 m2.
“Their glucose-lowering effects are modest, especially in people with baseline estimated GFR (eGFR) <45 mL/min/1.73 m2.”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In CKD patients with type 2 diabetes, urinary albumin-creatinine ratio above 300 mg/g, and eGFR 30 to below 90 mL/min/1.73 m2, canagliflozin's kidney and cardiovascular benefits were established by CREDENCE.
“In patients with CKD, the kidney and CVD benefits of canagliflozin were established by the CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes With Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) trial in patients with T2DM, urinary albumin-creatinine ratio >300 mg/g, and estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m2.”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
Results from the cardiovascular outcome trials and CREDENCE revealed more robust and consistent benefits on heart failure than on major adverse cardiovascular events with SGLT2 inhibitors.
“Results from these CVOTs and CREDENCE revealed more robust and consistent benefits on HF than on MACE with SGLT2 inhibitors (14).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
Diuresis is an important mechanism for reducing blood pressure and risk for heart failure events.
“Diuresis is an important mechanism for reducing blood pressure and risk for HF events (11–16,35).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
The cardiovascular outcome trials and CREDENCE were comparable in key aspects: type 2 diabetes participants, placebo controls, SGLT2 inhibitor dose not based on glycemia, all participants treated by standard of care, and similarly defined and adjudicated outcomes.
“The CVOTs designed to test safety and a CKD trial (CREDENCE) were comparable in key aspects: participants with T2DM, placebo controls, SGLT2 inhibitor dose not based on glycemia, all participants treated by standard of care, and similarly defined and adjudicated outcomes.”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
CREDENCE was the first clinical trial to be stopped early for overwhelming efficacy proving the kidney protective effects of SGLT2 inhibition for diabetic kidney disease.
“CREDENCE was the first clinical trial to be stopped early for overwhelming efficacy proving the kidney protective effects of SGLT2 inhibition for DKD.”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In CREDENCE, starting at a mean baseline eGFR of 56 mL/min/1.73 m2, risk for the primary outcome (serum creatinine doubling, kidney failure treated by kidney replacement therapy, or death from kidney disease or cardiovascular disease) was substantially reduced (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.59-0.82).
“Starting at a mean baseline eGFR of 56 mL/min/1.73 m2, risk for the primary outcome (serum creatinine doubling, kidney failure treated by KRT, or death from kidney disease or CVD) was substantially reduced (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59–0.82).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the cardiovascular outcome trials and CREDENCE, kidney-protective effects are consistent overall and in participants with different levels of glycemic control (HbA1c below 7% or above 9%) or eGFR strata (above 90, 60-90, or 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m2).
“In the CVOTs and CREDENCE, kidney-protective effects are consistent overall (Fig. 6) (69) and in participants with different levels of glycemic control (HbA1c <7% or >9%) or eGFR strata (>90, 60–90, or 30–60 mL/min/1.73 m2) (11,12,14,70).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In CREDENCE, kidney-protective effects were accomplished with nominal between-group differences in HbA1c levels or blood pressure.
“These kidney-protective effects were accomplished with nominal between-group differences in HbA1c levels or blood pressure.”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In CREDENCE, the number needed to treat with canagliflozin to prevent a primary outcome event was 22 during a mean of 2.6 years.
“The number needed to treat with canagliflozin to prevent a primary outcome event was 22 during a mean of 2.6 years.”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In CREDENCE, urinary albumin-creatinine ratio was reduced by 31%.
“In CREDENCE, urinary albumin-creatinine ratio was reduced by 31% (14).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In CREDENCE, after 3 weeks of treatment, the mean rate of eGFR decline was significantly slower in patients receiving canagliflozin compared with placebo (−1.85 vs −4.59 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year).
“After 3 weeks of treatment, the mean rate of eGFR decline was significantly slower in patients receiving canagliflozin compared with placebo (−1.85 vs. −4.59 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year) (Figs. 4 and 5).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
The effects on kidney disease outcomes are similar irrespective of background use of renin-angiotensin system blockade.
“The effects on kidney disease outcomes are also similar irrespective of background use of renin-angiotensin system blockade (14).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on kidney disease end points do not differ in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or those with multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors.
“The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on kidney disease end points do not differ in patients with established ASCVD or those with multiple CVD risk factors (12,14,70).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
Higher amputation and fracture risks were not seen in cardiovascular outcome trials of other SGLT2 inhibitors or with canagliflozin in CREDENCE.
“Higher risks for amputation and fracture were not observed in CVOTs of other SGLT2 inhibitors or with canagliflozin in the CREDENCE trial (14,69,95).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In CREDENCE, 29.8% of participants had a baseline eGFR of 30 to 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, and kidney benefits did not differ from those in patients with higher eGFR.
“In CREDENCE, 29.8% (1,313/4,401) of participants had a baseline eGFR of 30 to 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, and kidney benefits did not differ from those in patients with higher eGFR (14,69).”
From SGLT2 inhibition for CKD and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
Because DECLARE enrolled more patients without preexisting cardiovascular disease (59%) than CANVAS (34%) or EMPA-REG OUTCOME (0%), at least some benefits of SGLT2 inhibition extend to those without overt cardiovascular disease.
“DECLARE enrolled more patients without preexisting cardiovascular disease (59%) than either CANVAS (34%) or EMPA-REG OUTCOME (0%), meaning that at least some of the benefits of SGLT2 inhibition extend to those without overt cardiovascular disease.”
From Clinical management of stable coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association (2020) · cites this paper as [222]
The amputation and bone fracture adverse effects have not been reported with other SGLT2 inhibitors and were not observed in a subsequent trial of canagliflozin.
“adverse effects that have not been reported to date with other SGLT2 inhibitors and were not observed in a subsequent trial of canagliflozin”
From Clinical management of stable coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association (2020) · cites this paper as [222]
In individuals with or without type 2 diabetes, SGLT2 inhibitors cut the likelihood of progressing to kidney failure.
“Sodium glucose co-transporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitors reduce the risk of kidney failure in patients with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D).”
From A kidney perspective on the mechanism of action of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (2021) · cites this paper as Perkovic et al., 2019
In CREDENCE, canagliflozin lowered the risk of the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57-0.83).
“and of the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.69 [95% CI 0.57 -0.83])”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In CREDENCE, canagliflozin lowered the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.47-0.80).
“as well as lower risk of hospitalizations for heart failure (HR 0.61 [95% CI 0.47 -0.80])”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In CREDENCE, canagliflozin lowered the risk of the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.95).
“Canagli fl ozin was additionally found to have a lower risk of the composite of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke (HR 0.80 [95% CI 0.67 -0.95])”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In CREDENCE, canagliflozin reduced the primary composite outcome of end-stage kidney disease, doubling of serum creatinine, or renal or cardiovascular death by 30% compared with placebo (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.59-0.82).
“The risk of the primary composite outcome was 30% lower with canagli fl ozin treatment when compared with placebo (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.59 -0.82]).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In CREDENCE, canagliflozin did not significantly increase lower-limb amputations, fractures, acute kidney injury, or hyperkalemia compared with placebo.
“In terms of safety, no signi fi cant increase in lower-limb amputations, fractures, acute kidney injury, or hyperkalemia was noted for canaglifl ozin relative to placebo in CREDENCE.”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In CREDENCE, canagliflozin increased the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis, with 2.2 versus 0.2 events per 1,000 patient-years and a hazard ratio of 10.80 (95% CI 1.39-83.65).
“An increased risk for diabetic ketoacidosis was noted, however, with 2.2 and 0.2 events per 1,000 patient-years noted in the canagli fl ozin and placebo groups, respectively (HR 10.80 [95% CI 1.39 -83.65]) (194).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In CREDENCE, canagliflozin reduced the prespecified endpoint of end-stage kidney disease alone by 32% (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.86).
“Moreover, it reduced the prespeci fi ed end point of end-stage kidney disease alone by 32% (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.54 -0.86]).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
The CREDENCE trial was stopped early because a prespecified interim analysis found conclusive efficacy and no unexpected safety signals.
“The trial was stopped early due to conclusive evidence of ef fi cacy identi fi ed during a prespeci fi ed interim analysis with no unexpected safety signals.”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
Use of SGLT2 inhibitors has been associated with reduced incidence of heart failure.
“Reduced incidence of heart failure has been observed with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors (8,194,196).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
Numerous large randomized controlled trials report statistically significant reductions in cardiovascular events for three FDA-approved SGLT2 inhibitors: empagliflozin, canagliflozin, and dapagliflozin, with lesser benefits seen with ertugliflozin.
“In summary, there are now numerous large randomized controlled trials reporting statistically signi fi cant reductions in cardiovascular events for three of the FDA-approved SGLT2 inhibitors (empagli fl ozin, canagli fl ozin, dapagli fl ozin, with lesser bene fi ts seen with ertugli fl ozin)”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
In CREDENCE, canagliflozin reduced heart failure hospitalization by 39% and the composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization by 31% in a diabetic kidney disease population with albuminuria (UACR >300 to 5,000 mg/g).
“Additional data from the CREDENCE trial with canagli fl ozin showed a 39% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure, and 31% reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, in a diabetic kidney disease population with albuminuria (UACR > 300 to 5,000 mg/g) (194).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [194]
SGLT2 inhibitors slow the rate of decline in kidney function and reduce renal morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney dysfunction.
“In addition, they slow the rate of decline in kidney function in these patients and reduce renal morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney dysfunction.”
From Efficacy of Dapagliflozin on Renal Function and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Results of DAPA-HF (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
Despite improvements in kidney outcomes with available pharmacotherapies, the risk of kidney failure in people with CKD and type 2 diabetes remains high.
“Despite improvements in kidney outcomes with available pharmacotherapies, the risk of kidney failure in people with CKD and T2D remains high [14,15].”
Despite the availability of established and newer pharmacotherapies to delay CKD progression in people with T2D, the risk of progression and the associated morbidity and mortality remains substantial.
“Despite the availability of established and newer pharmacotherapies to delay CKD progression in people with T2D, the risk of progression and the associated morbidity and mortality remains substantial [14,15].”
Increased amputation risk has not been seen with other SGLT2 inhibitors, nor with canagliflozin in the subsequent CREDENCE trial.
“However, increased amputation risk has not been seen with other SGLT2 inhibitors, nor with canagliflozin in the subsequent CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes and Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) trial, in which such adverse events were systematically collected.40”
From Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as [40]
Cites
International Diabetes Federation 2017
Carracher, A. M., Marathe, P. H., & Close, K. L. (2018) · Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1111/1753-0407.12644 · Cited by 13,369 · see citing works
Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes
Zinman, B., Wanner, C., Lachin, J. M., Fitchett, D., Bluhmki, E., Hantel, S., Mattheus, M., Devins, T., Johansen, O. E., Woerle, H. J., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1504720 · Cited by 12,315 · see citing works
Self-citationCanagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes
Neal, B., Perkovic, V., Mahaffey, K. W., de Zeeuw, D., Fulcher, G., Erondu, N., Shaw, W., Law, G., Desai, M., & Matthews, D. R. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1611925 · Cited by 7,830 · see citing works
Self-citationBrenner, B. M., Cooper, M. E., de Zeeuw, D., Keane, W. F., Mitch, W. E., Parving, H.-H., Remuzzi, G., Snapinn, S. M., Zhang, Z., & Shahinfar, S. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011161 · Cited by 7,493 · see citing works
Self-citationDapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes
Wiviott, S. D., Raz, I., Bonaca, M. P., Mosenzon, O., Kato, E. T., Cahn, A., Silverman, M. G., Zelniker, T. A., Kuder, J. F., Murphy, S. A., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1812389 · Cited by 6,382 · see citing works
Lewis, E. J., Hunsicker, L. G., Clarke, W. R., Berl, T., Pohl, M. A., Lewis, J. B., Ritz, E., Atkins, R. C., Rohde, R., & Raz, I. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011303 · Cited by 5,987 · see citing works
Empagliflozin and Progression of Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes
Wanner, C., Inzucchi, S. E., Lachin, J. M., Fitchett, D., von Eynatten, M., Mattheus, M., Johansen, O. E., Woerle, H. J., Broedl, U. C., & Zinman, B. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1515920 · Cited by 3,655 · see citing works
Self-citationWorldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review
Liyanage, T., Ninomiya, T., Jha, V., Neal, B. C., Patrice, H. M., Okpechi, I. G., Zhao, M., Lv, J., Garg, A. X., Knight, J. F., et al. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61601-9 · Cited by 2,344 · see citing works
Self-citationCherney, D. Z. I., Perkins, B. A., Soleymanlou, N., Maione, M., Lai, V., Lee, A., Fagan, N. M., Woerle, H. J., Johansen, O. E., Broedl, U. C., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.113.005081 · Cited by 1,329 · see citing works
Fitchett, D., Zinman, B., Wanner, C., Lachin, J. M., Hantel, S., Salsali, A., Johansen, O. E., Woerle, H. J., Broedl, U. C., & Inzucchi, S. E. (2016) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv728 · Cited by 907 · see citing works
Self-citationDiverse biological actions of atrial natriuretic peptide
Brenner, B. M., Ballermann, B. J., Gunning, M. E., & Zeidel, M. L. (1990) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1990.70.3.665 · Cited by 897 · see citing works
Self-citationPerkovic, V., de Zeeuw, D., Mahaffey, K. W., Fulcher, G., Erondu, N., Shaw, W., Barrett, T. D., Weidner-Wells, M., Deng, H., Matthews, D. R., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(18)30141-4 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
Self-citationBrenner, B. M., Cooper, M. E., & de Zeeuw, D. (2002) · ACC Current Journal Review · doi:10.1016/s1062-1458(01)00549-9 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Self-citationCanagliflozin and Heart Failure in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results From the CANVAS Program
Rådholm, K., Figtree, G., Perkovic, V., Solomon, S. D., Mahaffey, K. W., de Zeeuw, D., Fulcher, G., Barrett, T. D., Shaw, W., Desai, M., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.118.034222 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
Self-citationJardine, M. J., Mahaffey, K. W., Neal, B., Agarwal, R., Bakris, G. L., Brenner, B. M., Bull, S., Cannon, C. P., Charytan, D. M., de Zeeuw, D., et al. (2017) · American Journal of Nephrology · doi:10.1159/000484633 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Self-citationOrtola, F. V., Ballermann, B. J., Anderson, S., Mendez, R. E., & Brenner, B. M. (1987) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci113120 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Self-citationWorldwide Access to Treatment for End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review
Liyanage, T., Ninomiya, T., & Jha, V. (2015) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.003 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Salt-Responsive Metabolite, β-Hydroxybutyrate, Attenuates Hypertension
Chakraborty, S., Galla, S., Cheng, X., Yeo, J. Y., Mell, B., Singh, V., Yeoh, B. S., Saha, P., Mathew, A. V., Vijay–Kumar, M., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.058 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Empagliflozin and Assessment of Lower-Limb Amputations in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial
Inzucchi, S. E., Iliev, H., Pfarr, E., & Zinman, B. (2018) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc17-1551 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Self-citationLewis, E. J., Hunsicker, L. G., & al, W. R. C. (2002) · ACC Current Journal Review · doi:10.1016/s1062-1458(01)00550-5 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Problems of stopping trials early
Guyatt, G. H., Briel, M., Glasziou, P., Bassler, D., & Montori, V. M. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e3863 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
ESTERLINE, R. L., Vaag, A. A., Oscarsson, J., & Vora, J. P. (2018) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje-17-0832 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Magnesium and Blood Pressure: A Physiology-Based Approach
Schutten, J. C., Joosten, M. M., de Borst, M. H., & Bakker, S. J. L. (2018) · Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease · doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2017.12.003 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Sternlicht, H., & Bakris, G. L. (2019) · Current Hypertension Reports · doi:10.1007/s11906-019-0920-4 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease
Stevens, P. E., Ahmed, S. B., Carrero, J. J., Foster, B., Francis, A., Hall, R. K., Herrington, W. G., Hill, G., Inker, L. A., Kazancıoğlu, R., et al. (2024) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018 · Cited by 8,530 · see citing works
Self-citationDapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction
McMurray, J. J. V., Solomon, S. D., Inzucchi, S. E., Køber, L., Kosiborod, M. N., Martinez, F. A., Ponikowski, P., Sabatine, M. S., Anand, I. S., Bělohlávek, J., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1911303 · Cited by 7,140 · see citing works
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice
Visseren, F. L. J., Mach, F., Smulders, Y. M., Carballo, D., Koskinas, K. C., Bäck, M., Benetos, A., Biffi, A., Boavida, J.-M., Capodanno, D., et al. (2021) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484 · Cited by 6,485 · see citing works
Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
Heerspink, H. J. L., Stefánsson, B. V., Correa-Rotter, R., Chertow, G. M., Greene, T., Hou, F.-F., Mann, J. F. E., McMurray, J. J. V., Lindberg, M., Rossing, P., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2024816 · Cited by 5,618 · see citing works
Self-citation2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes
Byrne, R. A., Rossello, X., Coughlan, J. J., Barbato, E., Berry, C., Chieffo, A., Claeys, M. J., Dan, G.-A., Dweck, M. R., Galbraith, M., et al. (2023) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191 · Cited by 5,333 · see citing works
Davies, M. J., D’Alessio, D. A., Fradkin, J., Kernan, W. N., Mathieu, C., Mingrone, G., Rossing, P., Tsapas, A., Wexler, D. J., & Buse, J. B. (2018) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci18-0033 · Cited by 3,518 · see citing works
Mancia, G., Kreutz, R., Brunström, M., Burnier, M., Grassi, G., Januszewicz, A., Muiesan, M. L., Tsioufis, K., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Algharably, E. A. E., et al. (2023) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000003480 · Cited by 3,473 · see citing works
Gerstein, H. C., Colhoun, H. M., Dagenais, G. R., Diaz, R., Lakshmanan, M., Pais, P., Probstfield, J., Riesmeyer, J. S., Riddle, M. C., Rydén, L., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31149-3 · Cited by 3,163 · see citing works
Effect of finerenone on chronic kidney disease outcomes in type 2 diabetes
Bakris, G. L., Agarwal, R., Anker, S. D., Pitt, B., Ruilope, L. M., Rossing, P., Kolkhof, P., Nowack, C., Schloemer, P., Joseph, A., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2025845 · Cited by 2,935 · see citing works
Self-citationThe changing landscape of atherosclerosis
Libby, P. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03392-8 · Cited by 2,873 · see citing works
Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
The EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2204233 · Cited by 2,754 · see citing works
“6,7 The CREDENCE trial of canagliflozin required all participants to have type 2 diabetes and a urinary ACR of at least 300 mg/g, and excluded patients with an eGFR of less than 30 ml per minute per 1.73 m 2 .”
InfluentialMcDonagh, T. A., Metra, M., Adamo, M., Gardner, R. S., Baumbach, A., Böhm, M., Burri, H., Butler, J., Čelutkienė, J., Chioncel, O., et al. (2023) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad195 · Cited by 2,783 · see citing works
Davies, M. J., Aroda, V. R., Collins, B. S., Gabbay, R. A., Green, J., Maruthur, N. M., Rosas, S. E., Del Prato, S., Mathieu, C., Mingrone, G., et al. (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci22-0034 · Cited by 2,104 · see citing works
“Notably, the benefits of GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i for cardiovascular and renal outcomes have been found to be independent of metformin use, and thus these agents should be considered in people with established or high risk of CVD, HF, or CKD, independent of metformin use (173–175).”
BackgroundInfluentialCardiovascular Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease
Jankowski, J., Floege, J., Fliser, D., Böhm, M., & Marx, N. (2021) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.120.050686 · Cited by 1,926 · see citing works
Sotagliflozin in patients with diabetes and recent worsening heart failure
Bhatt, D. L., Szarek, M., Steg, P. G., Cannon, C. P., Leiter, L. A., McGuire, D. K., Lewis, J. B., Riddle, M. C., Voors, A. A., Metra, M., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2030183 · Cited by 1,868 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of Semaglutide on Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Perkovic, V., Tuttle, K. R., Rossing, P., Mahaffey, K. W., Mann, J. F. E., Bakris, G., Baeres, F. M. M., Idorn, T., Bosch-Traberg, H., Lausvig, N. L., et al. (2024) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2403347 · Cited by 1,849 · see citing works
Self-citationChronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis and Management: A Review
Chen, T. K., Knicely, D. H., & Grams, M. E. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.14745 · Cited by 1,811 · see citing works
Genetics of diabetes mellitus and diabetes complications
Cole, J. B., & Florez, J. C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-020-0278-5 · Cited by 1,797 · see citing works
Kristensen, S. L., Rørth, R., Jhund, P. S., Docherty, K. F., Sattar, N., Preiss, D., Køber, L., Petrie, M. C., & McMurray, J. J. V. (2019) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30249-9 · Cited by 1,663 · see citing works
GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes - state-of-the-art
Nauck, M. A., Quast, D. R., Wefers, J., & Meier, J. J. (2021) · Molecular Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2020.101102 · Cited by 1,647 · see citing works
“For the time being, more robust effects have been reported for SGLT-2 inhibitors, which are preferred glucose-lowering medications interfering with the progression of diabetic renal disease even in patients with moderately reduced eGFR [110,111,167].”
Background2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes.
Marx, N., Federici, M., Schütt, K., Müller-Wieland, D., Ajjan, R. A., Antunes, M. J., Christodorescu, R. M., Crawford, C., Di Angelantonio, E., Eliasson, B., et al. (2023) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad192 · Cited by 1,642 · see citing works
Cardiovascular outcomes with ertugliflozin in type 2 diabetes
Cannon, C. P., Pratley, R., Dagogo-Jack, S., Mancuso, J., Huyck, S., Masiukiewicz, U., Charbonnel, B., Frederich, R., Gallo, S., Cosentino, F., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2004967 · Cited by 1,514 · see citing works
Self-citationDavies, M. J., D’Alessio, D. A., Fradkin, J., Kernan, W. N., Mathieu, C., Mingrone, G., Rossing, P., Tsapas, A., Wexler, D. J., & Buse, J. B. (2018) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-018-4729-5 · Cited by 1,455 · see citing works
Kalantar‐Zadeh, K., Jafar, T. H., Nitsch, D., Neuen, B. L., & Perkovic, V. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00519-5 · Cited by 1,572 · see citing works
Self-citationZannad, F., Ferreira, J. P., Pocock, S. J., Anker, S. D., Butler, J., Filippatos, G., Brueckmann, M., Ofstad, A. P., Pfarr, E., Jamal, W., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31824-9 · Cited by 1,408 · see citing works
KDIGO 2020 Clinical practice guideline for diabetes management in chronic kidney disease
de Boer, I. H., Caramori, M. L., Chan, J. C. N., Heerspink, H. J. L., Hurst, C., Khunti, K., Liew, A., Michos, E. D., Navaneethan, S. D., Olowu, W. A., et al. (2020) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2020.06.019 · Cited by 1,399 · see citing works
Self-citationKDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease
Rossing, P., Caramori, M. L., Chan, J. C. N., Heerspink, H. J. L., Hurst, C., Khunti, K., Liew, A., Michos, E. D., Navaneethan, S. D., Olowu, W. A., et al. (2022) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2022.06.008 · Cited by 1,373 · see citing works
Self-citationAgarwal, R., Filippatos, G., Pitt, B., Anker, S. D., Rossing, P., Joseph, A., Kolkhof, P., Nowack, C., Gebel, M., Ruilope, L. M., et al. (2022) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab777 · Cited by 1,317 · see citing works
Self-citationMcGuire, D. K., Shih, W. J., Cosentino, F., Charbonnel, B., Cherney, D. Z. I., Dagogo-Jack, S., Pratley, R., Greenberg, M., Wang, S., Huyck, S., et al. (2021) · JAMA Cardiology · doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4511 · Cited by 1,235 · see citing works
Self-citationSotagliflozin in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease
Bhatt, D. L., Szarek, M., Pitt, B., Cannon, C. P., Leiter, L. A., McGuire, D. K., Lewis, J. B., Riddle, M. C., Inzucchi, S. E., Kosiborod, M. N., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2030186 · Cited by 1,205 · see citing works
Self-citationBuse, J. B., Wexler, D. J., Tsapas, A., Rossing, P., Mingrone, G., Mathieu, C., D’Alessio, D. A., & Davies, M. J. (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci19-0066 · Cited by 1,192 · see citing works
Davies, M. J., Aroda, V. R., Collins, B. S., Gabbay, R. A., Green, J., Maruthur, N. M., Rosas, S. E., Del Prato, S., Mathieu, C., Mingrone, G., et al. (2022) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-022-05787-2 · Cited by 1,048 · see citing works
“The Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment Who Are at Cardiovascular Risk (SCORED) trial assessed sotagliflozin (a dual SGLT1i/SGLT2i, currently not approved for type 2 diabetes in the USA or the EU) in people with type 2 diabetes who h…”
InfluentialBaigent, C., Emberson, J., Haynes, R., Herrington, W. G., Judge, P., Landray, M. J., Mayne, K. J., Ng, S. Y. A., Preiss, D., Roddick, A. J., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02074-8 · Cited by 1,020 · see citing works
“…so individual trial investigators provided a re-analysis of eGFR data to derive this meta-analysis’ pre-selected composite kidney disease progression outcome as well as any other unavailable outcomes of interest (3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 17, 21, 41) (excluding the short duration SOLOIST-WHF trial (18)).”
Self-citationMetabolomics: A New Tool to Reveal the Nature of Diabetic Kidney Disease
Huang, G., Li, M., Li, Y. J., & Mao, Y. (2022) · Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1093/labmed/lmac041 · Cited by 933 · see citing works
de Boer, I. H., Khunti, K., Sadusky, T., Tuttle, K. R., Neumiller, J. J., Rhee, C. M., Rosas, S. E., Rossing, P., & Bakris, G. (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci22-0027 · Cited by 919 · see citing works
“982 and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation [CREDENCE] and Dapagliflozin And Prevention of Adverse outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease [DAPA-CKD]) demonstrated significant benefit for composite outcomes including end points of substantial eGFR decline, kidney failure, and mortality…”
BackgroundSelf-citation10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: <i>Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022</i>
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc22-s010 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
“Additional data from the CREDENCE trial with canagliflozin showed a 39% reduction in hospitalization for heart failure, and 31% reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, in a diabetic kidney disease population with albuminuria (UACR of >300 to 5,000 mg/g) (187).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTargeting the progression of chronic kidney disease
Ruiz-Ortega, M., Rayego-Mateos, S., Lamas, S., Ortiz, A., & Rodrigues-Diez, R. R. (2020) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-019-0248-y · Cited by 979 · see citing works
Neuen, B. L., Young, T., Heerspink, H. J. L., Neal, B., Perkovic, V., Billot, L., Mahaffey, K. W., Charytan, D. M., Wheeler, D. C., Arnott, C., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30256-6 · Cited by 893 · see citing works
Self-citationMechanisms of Cardiovascular Benefits of Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors
Lopaschuk, G. D., & Verma, S. (2020) · JACC Basic to Translational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.02.004 · Cited by 914 · see citing works
Maddox, T. M., Januzzi, J. L., Allen, L. A., Breathett, K. K., Butler, J., Davis, L. L., Fonarow, G. C., Ibrahim, N. E., Lindenfeld, J., Masoudi, F. A., et al. (2021) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.022 · Cited by 857 · see citing works
SGLT2 inhibitors: mechanisms of cardiovascular benefit beyond glycaemic control
Cowie, M., & Fisher, M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-020-0406-8 · Cited by 790 · see citing works
Delgado, C., Baweja, M., Crews, D. C., Eneanya, N. D., Gadegbeku, C. A., Inker, L. A., Mendu, M. L., Miller, W. G., Moxey-Mims, M. M., Roberts, G. V., et al. (2022) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.08.003 · Cited by 783 · see citing works
Selby, N. M., & Taal, M. W. (2020) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.14007 · Cited by 810 · see citing works
Gornik, H. L., Aronow, H. D., Goodney, P. P., Arya, S., Brewster, L. P., Byrd, L., Chandra, V., Drachman, D. E., Eaves, J. M., Ehrman, J. K., et al. (2024) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001251 · Cited by 771 · see citing works
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed, N. A., McCoy, R. G., Aleppo, G., Bajaj, M., Balapattabi, K., Beverly, E. A., Briggs Early, K., Bruemmer, D., Echouffo-Tcheugui, J. B., et al. (2025) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc25-s009 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Basic Mechanisms of Diabetic Heart Disease
Ritchie, R. H., & Abel, E. D. (2020) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.120.315913 · Cited by 730 · see citing works
Diabetic vascular diseases: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies
Li, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, S., Gao, M., Wang, W., Chen, K., Huang, L., & Liu, Y. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01400-z · Cited by 762 · see citing works
Palmer, S. C., Tendal, B., Mustafa, R. A., Vandvik, P. O., Li, S., Hao, Q., Tunnicliffe, D., Ruospo, M., Natale, P., Saglimbene, V., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m4573 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
“No difference in the odds of serious hypoglycaemia was found in a comparison of SGLT-2 inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment with placebo or with each other in high or moderate certainty evidence (appendix 8).”
BackgroundMosenzon, O., Wiviott, S. D., Cahn, A., Rozenberg, A., Yanuv, I., Goodrich, E. L., Murphy, S. A., Heerspink, H. J. L., Zelniker, T. A., Dwyer, J. P., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30180-9 · Cited by 684 · see citing works
Self-citationEpidemiology and risk of cardiovascular disease in populations with chronic kidney disease
Matsushita, K., Ballew, S. H., Wang, A. Y.-M., Kalyesubula, R., Schäeffner, E., & Agarwal, R. (2022) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-022-00616-6 · Cited by 698 · see citing works
Self-citationMolecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets for diabetic kidney disease
Tuttle, K. R., Agarwal, R., Alpers, C. E., Bakris, G. L., Brosius, F. C., Kolkhof, P., & Uribarri, J. (2022) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2022.05.012 · Cited by 694 · see citing works
Self-citationType 2 diabetes mellitus in adults: pathogenesis, prevention and therapy
Lu, X., Xie, Q., Pan, X., Zhang, R., Zhang, X., Peng, G., Zhang, Y., Shen, S., & Tong, N. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01951-9 · Cited by 787 · see citing works
Joseph, J. J., Deedwania, P., Acharya, T., Aguilar, D., Bhatt, D. L., Chyun, D. A., Di Palo, K. E., Golden, S. H., Sperling, L. S., & on behalf of the American Heart Association Diabetes Committee of the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Arteriosclerosis, T. A. V. B. C. O. C. C. A. C. O. H. (2022) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001040 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Antar, S. A., Ashour, N. A., Sharaky, M. M., Khattab, M., Ashour, N. A., Zaid, R. T., Roh, E. J., Elkamhawy, A., & Al-Karmalawy, A. A. (2023) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115734 · Cited by 749 · see citing works
Seferovic, P. M., Ponikowski, P. P., Anker, S. D., Bauersachs, J. K., Chioncel, O., Cleland, J. G. F., de Boer, R. A., Drexel, H., Gal, T. B., Hill, L., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ejhf.1531 · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Garber, A. J., Handelsman, Y., Grunberger, G., Einhorn, D., Abrahamson, M. J., Barzilay, J. I., Blonde, L., Bush, M. A., DeFronzo, R. A., Garber, J. R., et al. (2020) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/cs-2019-0472 · Cited by 598 · see citing works
Innate immunity in diabetic kidney disease
Tang, S. C. W., & Yiu, W. H. (2020) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-019-0234-4 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Pathophysiology of diabetic kidney disease: impact of SGLT2 inhibitors
DeFronzo, R. A., Reeves, W. B., & Awad, A. S. (2021) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-021-00393-8 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists: established and emerging indications
Brown, E., Heerspink, H. J. L., Cuthbertson, D. J., & Wilding, J. P. H. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00536-5 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
Self-citationRabi, D. M., McBrien, K. A., Sapir-Pichhadze, R., Nakhla, M., Ahmed, S. B., Dumanski, S. M., Butalia, S., Leung, A. A., Harris, K. C., Cloutier, L., et al. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2020.02.086 · Cited by 583 · see citing works
Shlipak, M. G., Tummalapalli, S. L., Boulware, L. E., Grams, M. E., Ix, J. H., Jha, V., Kengne, A.-P., Madero, M., Mihaylova, B., Tangri, N., et al. (2021) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2020.10.012 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
“SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with CKD with proteinuria and diabetes reduce the risk of kidney failure by 30%–40%.(18,19) 3.”
BackgroundVerma, S., Mazer, C. D., Yan, A. T.-K., Mason, T., Garg, V., Teoh, H., Zuo, F., Quan, A., Farkouh, M. E., FITCHETT, D. H., et al. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.119.042375 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
Self-citationInsulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis: Implications for Insulin-Sensitizing Agents
Di Pino, A., & DeFronzo, R. A. (2019) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2018-00141 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Kittleson, M. M., Panjrath, G. S., Amancherla, K., Davis, L. L., Deswal, A., Dixon, D. L., Januzzi, J. L., & Yancy, C. W. (2023) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.03.393 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice
Visseren, F. L. J., Mach, F., Smulders, Y. M., Carballo, D., Koskinas, K. C., Bäck, M., Bénétos, A., Biffi, A., Boavida, J.-M., Capodanno, D., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwab154 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Emerging Targets in Type 2 Diabetes and Diabetic Complications
Demir, S., Nawroth, P. P., Herzig, S., & Üstünel, B. E. (2021) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202100275 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Kidney and Cardiovascular Function
Vallon, V., & Verma, S. (2020) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-031620-095920 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
“Na+ reabsorption downstream to S3 and mTAL segments increases QO2 (10) and lowers PO2 in the outer medulla (OM) (5).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBuse, J. B., Wexler, D. J., Tsapas, A., Rossing, P., Mingrone, G., Mathieu, C., D’Alessio, D. A., & Davies, M. J. (2020) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-019-05039-w · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Blonde, L., Umpierrez, G. E., Reddy, S. S., McGill, J. B., Berga, S. L., Bush, M., Chandrasekaran, S., DeFronzo, R. A., Einhorn, D., Galindo, R. J., et al. (2022) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2022.08.002 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: <i>Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020</i>
American Diabetes Association (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-s010 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i>
ElSayed, N. A., Aleppo, G., Aroda, V. R., Bannuru, R. R., Brown, F. M., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B. S., Das, S. R., Hilliard, M. E., Isaacs, D., et al. (2023) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc23-s010 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Das, S. R., Everett, B. M., Birtcher, K. K., Brown, J. M., Januzzi, J. L., Kalyani, R. R., Kosiborod, M., Magwire, M., Morris, P. B., Neumiller, J. J., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.037 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
“Benefits and adverse effects in the group with the lowest eGFR were consistent with those in the remainder of the cohort (19).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialThe Magic of Randomization versus the Myth of Real-World Evidence
Collins, R., Bowman, L. J., Landray, M., & Peto, R. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsb1901642 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Authors/Task Force Members:, McDonagh, T. A., Metra, M., Adamo, M., Gardner, R. S., Baumbach, A., Böhm, M., Burri, H., Butler, J., Čelutkienė, J., et al. (2024) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ejhf.3024 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
Zelniker, T. A., Bonaca, M. P., Furtado, R. H. M., Mosenzon, O., Kuder, J. F., Murphy, S. A., Bhatt, D. L., Leiter, L. A., McGuire, D. K., Wilding, J. P. H., et al. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.119.044183 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
The tubular hypothesis of nephron filtration and diabetic kidney disease
Vallon, V., & Thomson, S. C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-020-0256-y · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Damman, K., Beusekamp, J. C., Boorsma, E. M., Swart, H. P., Smilde, T. D. J., Elvan, A., van Eck, J. W. M., Heerspink, H. J. L., & Voors, A. A. (2020) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ejhf.1713 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Self-citationSignaling pathways of chronic kidney diseases, implications for therapeutics
Yuan, Q., Tang, B., & Zhang, C. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01036-5 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
“62 years.(310) Canagliflozin also decreased the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with DN.”
BackgroundPacker, M., Anker, S. D., Butler, J., Filippatos, G., Ferreira, J. P., Pocock, S. J., Carson, P., Anand, I., Doehner, W., Haass, M., et al. (2021) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.120.051783 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
“Events that were considered to reflect clinical deterioration included: (1) worsening heart failure that required the use of an intravenous drug for heart failure in an emergency department; (2) worsening heart failure that required the use of an intravenous drug for heart failure in an outpatient urgent care setting;…”
BackgroundBone fragility in diabetes: novel concepts and clinical implications
Hofbauer, L. C., Busse, B., Eastell, R., Ferrari, S., Frost, M., Müller, R., Burden, A. M., Rivadeneira, F., Napoli, N., & Rauner, M. (2022) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(21)00347-8 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024</i>
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed, N. A., Aleppo, G., Bannuru, R. R., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B. S., Das, S. R., Ekhlaspour, L., Hilliard, M. E., Johnson, E. L., et al. (2024) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc24-s010 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Hypertension in Diabetes: An Update of Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Disease
Jia, G., & Sowers, J. R. (2021) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.121.17981 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Caleyachetty, R., Barber, T. M., Mohammed, N. I., Cappuccio, F. P., Hardy, R., Mathur, R., Banerjee, A., & Gill, P. (2021) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(21)00088-7 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Nassif, M. E., Windsor, S. L., Tang, F., Khariton, Y., Husain, M., Inzucchi, S. E., McGuire, D. K., Pitt, B., Scirica, B. M., Austin, B., et al. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.119.042929 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Microvascular Dysfunction in Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiometabolic Disease
Horton, W. B., & Barrett, E. J. (2020) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/endrev/bnaa025 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Delgado, C., Baweja, M., Crews, D. C., Eneanya, N. D., Gadegbeku, C. A., Inker, L. A., Mendu, M. L., Miller, W. G., Moxey‐Mims, M., Roberts, G. V., et al. (2021) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2021070988 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
“73 m(2) on the basis of the CKD-EPI equation.(37) Using the creatinine-based equations that would remove race and report high muscle mass and low muscle mass or high value and low value (approaches CKD-EPIcr_MM and CKD-EPIcr_H/ L), trial inclusion and outcomes would likely be similar, if not identical, to the original…”
BackgroundDiabetic Nephropathy: An Overview
Sagoo, M. K., & Gnudi, L. (2019) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-9841-8_1 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: <i>Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021</i>
American Diabetes Association (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc21-s010 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Pop‐Busui, R., Januzzi, J. L., Bruemmer, D., Butalia, S., Green, J. B., Horton, W. B., Knight, C. M., Levi, M., Rasouli, N., & Richardson, C. R. (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci22-0014 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Hypertension as Cardiovascular Risk Factor in Chronic Kidney Disease
Burnier, M., & Damianaki, A. (2023) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.122.321762 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
11. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: <i>Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021</i>
American Diabetes Association (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc21-s011 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
“It was stopped early due to positive efficacy and showed a 32% risk reduction for development of ESRD over control (26).”
BackgroundInfluential11. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: <i>Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes−2020</i>
American Diabetes Association (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-s011 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
“cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke (24,74).”
BackgroundInfluentialMatthews, D. R., Paldánius, P. M., Proot, P., Chiang, Y., Stumvoll, M., & Del Prato, S. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32131-2 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Zoccali, C., Mallamaci, F., Adamczak, M., de Oliveira, R. B., Massy, Z. A., Sarafidis, P. A., Agarwal, R., Mark, P. B., Kotanko, P., Ferro, C. J., et al. (2023) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvad083 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
“156 Three major trials, (i) the Empagliflozin and Progression of Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes, 157 a sub-study of the Empagliflozin, CV outcomes, and mortality in Type 2 diabetes, (ii) the Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation, 158 and (iii) the Dapagliflozin…”
Self-citationLipotoxicity and Diabetic Nephropathy: Novel Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Opportunities
Opazo-Ríos, L., Mas, S., Marín-Royo, G., Mezzano, S., Gómez-Guerrero, C., Moreno, J. A., & Egido, J. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21072632 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
van Bommel, E. J. M., Muskiet, M. H. A., van Baar, M. J. B., Tonneijck, L., Smits, M. M., Emanuel, A. L., Bozovic, A., Danser, A. H. J., Geurts, F., Hoorn, E. J., et al. (2020) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2019.09.013 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Kidney lipid dysmetabolism and lipid droplet accumulation in chronic kidney disease
Mitrofanova, A. V., Merscher, S., & Fornoni, A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-023-00741-w · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Packer, M., Butler, J., Zannad, F. M., Filippatos, G. S., Ferreira, J. P., Pocock, S., Carson, P. E., Anand, I. S., Doehner, W., Haass, M., et al. (2021) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.121.056824 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
de Boer, I. H., Khunti, K. K., Sadusky, T., Tuttle, K. R., Neumiller, J. J., Rhee, C. M., Rosas, S. E., Rossing, P. R., & Bakris, G. L. (2022) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2022.08.012 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuen, B. L., Heerspink, H. J. L., Vart, P., Claggett, B. L., Fletcher, R. A., Arnott, C., de Oliveira Costa, J., Falster, M. O., Pearson, S.-A., Mahaffey, K. W., et al. (2024) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.123.067584 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Perkovic, V., Jardine, M. J., Neal, B., Bompoint, S., Heerspink, H. J. L., Charytan, D. M., Edwards, R., Agarwal, R., Bakris, G., Bull, S., Cannon, C. P., Capuano, G., Chu, P.-L., de Zeeuw, D., Greene, T., Levin, A., Pollock, C., Wheeler, D. C., Yavin, Y., Zhang, H., Zinman, B., Meininger, G., Brenner, B. M., & Mahaffey, K. W.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- From the George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales Sydney (V.P., M.J.J., B.N., S. Bompoint), the Royal North Shore Hospital (V.P.), Concord Repatriation General Hospital (M.J.J.), and the Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney (B.N.), Sydney, and the Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW (C.P.) — all in Australia; Imperial College London (B.N.) and the Department of Renal...
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2019-06-13
- Volume
- 380
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2295-2306
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2939222610
- Semantic Scholar
- 043a4b59176d4f2db8d5636dfb3b6f53d0e41867
- Cited by
- 6,189
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 666 · 2025: 733 · 2024: 833 · 2023: 892 · 2022: 900 · 2021: 954 · 2020: 841 · 2019: 353 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 588.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium (University of Szeged) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (acceptedVersion)
- UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
- Keywords
- canagliflozin, type 2 diabetes, diabetic nephropathy, SGLT2 inhibitors, renal outcomes, end-stage renal disease, cardiovascular events, heart failure hospitalization, kidney failure prevention, renal function decline, cardiovascular safety, early trial termination
- MeSH terms
- Canagliflozin, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Creatinine, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Nephropathies, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-16.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-16.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review