Cited by 144Reproductive Health and ContraceptionHealth and Conflict StudiesGlobal Maternal and Child Health

A long way to go: a systematic review to assess the utilisation of sexual and reproductive health services during humanitarian crises

Open access
Singh, Neha S, Aryasinghe, Sarindi, Smith, James, Khosla, Rajat, Say, Lale, Blanchet, Karl·2018·BMJ Global Health

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Women and girls are affected significantly in both sudden and slow-onset emergencies, and face multiple sexual and reproductive health (SRH) challenges in humanitarian crises contexts. There are an estimated 26 million women and girls of reproductive age living in humanitarian crises settings, all of whom need access to SRH information and services. This systematic review aimed to assess the utilisation of services of SRH interventions from the onset of emergencies in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: We searched for both quantitative and qualitative studies in peer-reviewed journals across the following four databases: EMBASE, Global Health, MEDLINE and PsychINFO from 1 January 1980 to 10 April 2017. Primary outcomes of interest included self-reported use and/or confirmed use of the Minimum Initial Service Package services and abortion services. Two authors independently extracted and analysed data from published papers on the effect of SRH interventions on a range of SRH care utilisation outcomes from the onset of emergencies, and used a narrative synthesis approach. RESULTS: Of the 2404 identified citations, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. 52.1% of the studies (n=12) used quasi-experimental study designs, which provided some statistical measure of difference between intervention and outcome. 39.1% of the studies (n=9) selected were graded as high quality, 39.1% moderate quality (n=9) and 17.4% low quality (n=4). Evidence of effectiveness in increasing service utilisation was available for the following interventions: peer-led and interpersonal education and mass media campaigns, community-based programming and three-tiered network of community-based reproductive and maternal health providers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increased attention to SRH service provision in humanitarian crises settings, the evidence base is still very limited. More implementation research is required to identify interventions to increase utilisation of SRH services in diverse humanitarian crises settings and populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000682

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From previous systematic reviews focusing on SRH services and programmes, only one reported a study where ENC was evaluated.

    “From the previous systematic reviews focusing on the effectiveness, utilisation of and evaluation of SRH services and programmes,2 16 17 only one reported a study where ENC was evaluated.2”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]Report of the international conference on population and development. 1994 International Conference on Population and Development New York: United Nations.
  2. [13]Qayum M, Arooj H, Mohmand S Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) access to displaced people of Pakistan based on sphere standards and indicators. J Pak Med Assoc 2013; 63: 1027– 30.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, N. S., Aryasinghe, S., Smith, J., Khosla, R., Say, L., & Blanchet, K.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Singh, Neha S
Venue
BMJ Global Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-05
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
e000682
ISSN
2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800491443
Cited by
144
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMJ Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
World Health Organization - Department of Reproductive Health and Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
sexual and reproductive health services, humanitarian crisis, service utilization, abortion services, women and girls, peer education, mass media campaigns, community-based programs, low- and middle-income countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review