Cited by 13Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementHealthcare Systems and Public HealthGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Premature adult mortality in India: what is the size of the matter?

Open access
Rao, Chalapati, Gupta, Aashish, Gupta, Mamta, Yadav, Ajit Kumar·2021·BMJ Global Health

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Reducing adult mortality by 2030 is a key component of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs). Monitoring progress towards these goals requires timely and reliable information on deaths by age, sex and cause. To estimate baseline measures for UNSDGs, this study aimed to use several different data sources to estimate subnational measures of premature adult mortality (between 30 and 70 years) for India in 2017. Methods: Age-specific population and mortality data were accessed for India and its 21 larger states from the Civil Registration System and Sample Registration System for 2017, and the most recent National Family and Health Survey. Similar data on population and deaths were also procured from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 and the National Burden of Disease Estimates Study for 2017. Life table methods were used to estimate life expectancy and age-specific mortality at national and state level from each source. An additional set of life tables were estimated using an international two-parameter model life table system. Three indicators of premature adult mortality were derived by sex for each location and from each data source, for comparative analysis Results: Marked variations in mortality estimates from different sources were noted for each state. Assuming the highest mortality level from all sources as the potentially true value, premature adult mortality was estimated to cause a national total of 2.6 million male and 1.8 million female deaths in 2017, with Bihar, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal accounting for half of these deaths. There was marked heterogeneity in risk of premature adult mortality, ranging from 351 per 1000 in Kerala to 558 per 1000 in Chhattisgarh among men, and from 198 per 1000 in Himachal Pradesh to 409 per 1000 in Assam among women. Conclusions: Available data and estimates for mortality measurement in India are riddled with uncertainty. While the findings from this analysis may be useful for initial subnational health policy to address UNSDGs, more reliable empirical data is required for monitoring and evaluation. For this, strengthening death registration, improving methods for cause of death ascertainment and establishment of robust mortality statistics programs are a priority.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004451

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [25]Dandona L, Dandona R, Kumar GA, et al. Nations within a nation: variations in epidemiological transition across the states of India, 1990-2016 in the global burden of disease study. Lancet 2017; 390: 2437– 60. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32804-0 29150201 PMC5720596 · DOI
  2. [31]Benjamin Gompertz. X. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies 1825; 115: 513– 83.
  3. [34]Mahapatra P. The Sample Registration System (SRS) in India: An Overview, as of 2017. Workshop on National CRVS Verbal Autopsy Sampling Strategies [Internet]. 2017, 2017. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326098440_The_Sample_Registration_System_SRS_in_India_An_Overview_as_of_2017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rao, C., Gupta, A., Gupta, M., & Yadav, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Alchemist Research and Data Analysis, Chandigarh, India
  • International Institute for Population Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Rao, Chalapati
Venue
BMJ Global Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2021-06
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
e004451
ISSN
2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3166088114
Cited by
13
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
India, Sustainable Development Goals, life tables, sex differences in mortality, death registration, cause of death determination, mortality statistics
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, India, Life Expectancy, Male, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review