Cited by 7Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCensus and Population Estimation

Subnational mortality estimates for India in 2019: a baseline for evaluating excess deaths due to the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Rao, Chalapati, John, Amrit Jose, Yadav, Ajit Kumar, Siraj, Mansha·2021·BMJ Global Health

Abstract

Background: Estimates of excess mortality are required to assess and compare the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across populations. For India, reliable baseline prepandemic mortality patterns at national and subnational level are necessary for such assessments. However, available data from the Civil Registration System (CRS) is affected by incompleteness of death recording that varies by sex, age and location. Methods: Under-reporting of CRS 2019 deaths was assessed for three age groups (< 5 years, 15–59 years and ≥60 years) at subnational level, through comparison with age-specific death rates from alternate sources. Age-specific corrections for under-reporting were applied to derive adjusted death counts by sex for each location. These were used to compute life expectancy (LE) at birth by sex in 2019, which were compared with subnational LEs from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 Study. Results: A total of 9.92 million deaths (95% UI 9.70 to 10.02) were estimated across India in 2019, about 2.28 million more than CRS reports. Adjustments to under-five and elderly mortality accounted for 30% and 56% of additional deaths, respectively. Adjustments in Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh accounted for 75% of all additional deaths. Adjusted LEs were below corresponding GBD estimates by ≥2 years for males at national level and in 20 states, and by ≥1 year for females in 12 states. Conclusions: These results represent the first-ever subnational mortality estimates for India derived from CRS reported deaths, and serve as a baseline for assessing excess mortality from the COVID-19 pandemic. Adjusted life expectancies indicate higher mortality patterns in India than previously perceived. Under-reporting of infant deaths and those among women and the elderly is evident in many locations. Further CRS strengthening is required to improve the empirical basis for local mortality measurement across the country.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007399

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [28]Pandey A, Roy N, Bhawsar RD. Health information system in India: issues of data availability and quality. Demogr India 2010; 39: 239– 45.
  2. [32]Rao C, Gupta A, Gupta M, et al. Premature adult mortality in India: what is the size of the matter? BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6: e004451. 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004451 PMC8211056 34135070 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [40]Preston SH. Use of direct and indirect techniques for estimating the completeness of registration systems. Data bases for mortality measurement proceedings of the United nations/World Health organization Working group on data bases for measurement of levels, trends, and differentials in mortality; Bangkok 1981; 84.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rao, C., John, A. J., Yadav, A. K., & Siraj, M.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • International Institute for Population Sciences (IN)
  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (PH)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Rao, Chalapati
Venue
BMJ Global Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2021-11
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
e007399
ISSN
2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3215672415
Cited by
7
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
Keywords
excess mortality, COVID-19 pandemic, baseline mortality, civil registration, life expectancy, infant mortality, elderly mortality, sex differences in mortality, India
MeSH terms
Global Burden of Disease, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Aged, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, India, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review