Cited by 30Migration, Health and TraumaMental Health Treatment and AccessDigital Mental Health Interventions

Self-Help Plus for refugees and asylum seekers: an individual participant data meta-analysis

Open access
Karyotaki, Eirini, Sijbrandij, Marit, Purgato, Marianna, Acarturk, Ceren, Lakin, Daniel, Bailey, Della, Peckham, Emily, Uygun, Ersin +19 more·2023·BMJ Mental Health

Abstract

Question: Refugees and asylum seekers are at high risk of mental disorders due to various stressors before, during and after forceful displacement. The WHO Self-Help Plus (SH+) intervention was developed to manage psychological distress and a broad range of mental health symptoms in vulnerable populations. This study aimed to examine the effects and moderators of SH+ compared with Enhanced Care as Usual (ECAU) in reducing depressive symptoms among refugees and asylum seekers. Study selection and analysis: Three randomised trials were identified with 1795 individual participant data (IPD). We performed an IPD meta-analysis to estimate the effects of SH+, primarily on depressive symptoms and second on post-traumatic stress, well-being, self-identified problems and functioning. Effects were also estimated at 5–6 months postrandomisation (midterm). Findings: There was no evidence of a difference between SH+ and ECAU+ in reducing depressive symptoms at postintervention. However, SH+ had significantly larger effects among participants who were not employed (β=1.60, 95% CI 0.20 to 3.00) and had lower mental well-being levels (β=0.02, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.05). At midterm, SH+ was significantly more effective than ECAU in improving depressive symptoms (β=−1.13, 95% CI −1.99 to −0.26), self-identified problems (β=−1.56, 95% CI −2.54 to −0.59) and well-being (β=6.22, 95% CI 1.60 to 10.90). Conclusions: Although SH+ did not differ significantly from ECAU in reducing symptoms of depression at postintervention, it did present benefits for particularly vulnerable participants (ie, unemployed and with lower mental well-being levels), and benefits were also evident at midterm follow-up. These results are promising for the use of SH+ in the management of depressive symptoms and improvement of well-being and self-identified problems among refugees and asylum seekers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300672

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. Guilford Press, 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karyotaki, E., Sijbrandij, M., Purgato, M., Acarturk, C., Lakin, D., Bailey, D., Peckham, E., Uygun, E., Tedeschi, F., Wancata, J., Augustinavicius, J., Carswell, K., Välimäki, M., van Ommeren, M., Koesters, M., Popa, M., Leku, M. R., Anttila, M., Churchill, R., White, R. G., Al-Hashimi, S., Lantta, T., Au, T., Klein, T., Tol, W. A., Cuijpers, P., & Barbui, C.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Department of Psychology, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of York (GB)
  • Yüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi (TR)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  • Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • HealthRight Uganda, Arua, Uganda
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
Karyotaki, Eirini
Venue
BMJ Mental Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2023-07
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
e300672
ISSN
2755-9734 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385412084
Cited by
30
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Bangor University Research Portal (Bangor University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • European Commission (779255)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
refugees, asylum seekers, depressive symptoms, post-traumatic stress, psychological well-being, psychological distress, forced displacement, employment status
MeSH terms
Psychological Well-Being, Humans, Mental Health, Refugees, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review