Cited by 151Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Self‐Help Plus ( SH +): a new WHO stress management package

Open access
Epping‐Jordan, JoAnne E., Harris, Russ, Brown, Felicity L., Carswell, Kenneth, Foley, Claudette, García‐Moreno, Claudia, Kogan, Cary, van Ommeren, Mark·2016·World Psychiatry

Abstract

Consistent with its recommendations for stress management interventions1, the World Health Organization (WHO) has developed a new psychological intervention for managing stress and coping with adversity. This new intervention is intended to be relevant for coping with any type of adversity, including chronic poverty, endemic community and gender-based violence, long-term armed conflict, and displacement. It is especially targeted towards places with enormous needs but limited humanitarian access, such as Syria and South Sudan. Following exposure to adversity, rates of diverse mental health problems and non-pathological distress increase. At the same time, most people affected by adversity do not have access to effective mental health and psychosocial support2. Without mental health specialists on the ground, either for direct service delivery or for training and supervising non-specialists3, 4, new approaches need to be established that can be delivered without an extensive workforce for mental health. SH+ was developed to address these needs. It does not require much time from experts for implementation: instead, it uses a guided self-help format and is delivered through a pre-recorded audio course, complemented with bibliotherapy. The potential of using a course to access hard-to-reach populations has been demonstrated previously5. Evidence for bibliotherapy is also promising6. Furthermore, research has found that guided self-help programs produce better results than "pure" (unguided) self-help, and the effects produced by guided self-help are surprisingly similar to face-to-face psychological treatment7. SH+ was designed to be relevant for large segments of adversity-affected populations: it is intended to be transdiagnostic, easily adaptable to different cultures and languages, and both meaningful and safe for people with and without mental disorders. The program was developed with experts in psychological care and global mental health, and colleagues in the humanitarian field. It underwent extensive peer-review, with 43 external experts reviewing the intervention. The SH+ package has two components: a pre-recorded course and a self-help book. Pre-recorded audio material (locally adapted) is delivered across five 2-hour sessions and in groups of 20 to 30 people. The audio material imparts key information about stress management and guides participants through individual exercises and small group discussions. A written facilitator guide helps briefly trained non-specialist facilitators to conduct the course using these audio materials. To augment the course materials, an illustrated self-help book reviews all essential content and concepts. The book – inspired by an existing illustrated self-help guide8 – contains more than 400 illustrations and conveys key points with minimal text. It was written to be useful both as a standalone product and as a key resource for those participating in the course. The format of SH+ is innovative in that it seeks to ensure that key intervention components are delivered as intended through the use of pre-recorded audio, without the burden of extensive training and supervision. This mode of delivery holds promise for helping hard-to-reach populations: the package may be introduced in areas where a conventionally delivered mental health intervention would not be feasible (e.g., remote areas, or areas where humanitarian access is limited). SH+ is based on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), a form of cognitive-behavioral therapy, with distinct features9. ACT is based on the concept that ongoing attempts to suppress unwanted thoughts and feelings can paradoxically make these problems worse. Instead, it emphasizes learning new ways to accommodate difficult thoughts and feelings – primarily through mindfulness approaches – without letting them dominate, while guiding people to take proactive steps towards living in a way that is consistent with their values. ACT has been shown to be useful for a range of mental health issues10 and has been used successfully in a guided self-help format11. Components of the SH+ package are currently being piloted in Syria, with Syrian refugees in Turkey, and with South Sudanese refugees in northern Uganda. Initial feedback has been positive. Funding has been secured for a full-scale randomized controlled trial to evaluate the SH+ course in Uganda later this year. Following evaluation and any necessary revisions, the SH+ package may become part of WHO's growing collection of low-intensity psychological interventions. Thinking Healthy (for perinatal depression)12 and Problem Management Plus (PM+; delivered in face-to-face sessions)4 are the first two of this collection. Over the next five years, the WHO will design and rigorously test additional psychological interventions for different age groups and using varying delivery models. Mental health specialists will always be essential for supervision and for management of those for whom these in

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20355

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 11 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Self-Help Plus (SH 1 ): a new WHO stress management package · p. 1

    Early responses from testing SH+ in Syria, among Syrian refugees in Turkey, and among South Sudanese refugees in northern Uganda were favorable.

    “Components of the SH 1 package are currently being piloted in Syria, with Syrian refugees in Turkey, and with South Sudanese refugees in northern Uganda. Initial feedback has been positive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisecitation
    § Self-Help Plus (SH 1 ): a new WHO stress management package · p. 1

    A majority of adversity-affected individuals cannot obtain effective mental health and psychosocial support.

    “At the same time, most people affected by adversity do not have access to effective mental health and psychosocial support 2 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] Tol WA, Barbui C, Galappatti A et al. Lancet 2011;378:1581-91. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation
    § Self-Help Plus (SH 1 ): a new WHO stress management package · p. 1

    Prior work has shown that a course format can reach populations that are hard to access.

    “The potential of using a course to access hard-to-reach populations has been demonstrated previously 5 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] Cuijpers P , Mu ~ noz RF , Clarke GN et al. Clin Psychol Rev 2009;29:449-58. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation
    § Self-Help Plus (SH 1 ): a new WHO stress management package · p. 1

    In many places, there are insufficient mental health specialists to provide services directly or to train and supervise non-specialists.

    “Without mental health specialists on the ground, either for direct service delivery or for training and supervising nonspecialists 3,4”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] World Health Organization and United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. mhGAP Humanitarian Intervention Guide (mhGAP-HIG). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [4] Dawson KS, Bryant RA, Harper M et al. World Psychiatry 2015;14:354-7. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation
    § Self-Help Plus (SH 1 ): a new WHO stress management package · p. 1

    Guided self-help produces effects comparable to those of in-person psychological treatment.

    “the effects produced by guided self-help are surprisingly similar to face-to-face psychological treatment 7 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] World Health Organization. WHO mhGAP guideline update. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Self-Help Plus (SH 1 ): a new WHO stress management package · p. 1

    The intervention was extensively peer-reviewed by 43 external experts.

    “It underwent extensive peer-review, with 43 external experts reviewing the intervention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Self-Help Plus (SH 1 ): a new WHO stress management package · p. 1

    ACT holds that trying to suppress unwanted thoughts and feelings can paradoxically worsen them.

    “ACT is based on the concept that ongoing attempts to suppress unwanted thoughts and feelings can paradoxically make these problems worse.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Hayes SC, Pistorello J, Levin M. Couns Psychol 2012;40:976-1002. source

      Not checked in the free run.

2 of 2
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    After adversity, the prevalence of various mental health problems and non-pathological distress rises.

    “Following exposure to adversity, rates of diverse mental health problems and non-pathological distress increase.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. World Health Organization and United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees., 2015, mhGAP Humanitarian Intervention Guide (mhGAP‐HIG)
  2. World Health Organization, 2015, WHO mhGAP guideline update
  3. Harris R, 2013, The illustrated happiness trap
  4. World Health Organization, 2015, Thinking Healthy: a manual for psychosocial management of perinatal depression (WHO generic field‐trial version 1.0)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Epping‐Jordan, J. E., Harris, R., Brown, F. L., Carswell, K., Foley, C., García‐Moreno, C., Kogan, C., & van Ommeren, M.
Affiliations
  • WHO Consultant Seattle WA USA
  • WHO Consultant Melbourne Australia
  • Harvard University (US)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • World Health Organization Geneva Switzerland
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09-22
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
295-296
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W2521400234
Cited by
151
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
9.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
stress management, guided self-help, bibliotherapy, adversity, audio course, transdiagnostic treatment, community violence, armed conflict, displacement, chronic poverty, global mental health, South Sudan conflict, non-communicable diseases, mental health promotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review