Cited by 9Migration, Health and TraumaMental Health Treatment and AccessDigital Mental Health Interventions

Self-help plus for refugees and asylum seekers; study protocol for a series of individual participant data meta-analyses

Open access
Karyotaki, Eirini, Sijbrandij, Marit, Purgato, Marianna, Acarturk, Ceren, Lakin, Daniel, Bailey, Della, Peckham, Emily, Uygun, Ersin +19 more·2021·European Journal of Psychotraumatology

Abstract

Background: Refugees and asylum seekers face various stressors due to displacement and are especially vulnerable to common mental disorders. To effectively manage psychological distress in this population, innovative interventions are required. The World Health Organization (WHO) Self-Help Plus (SH+) intervention has shown promising outcomes in reducing symptoms of common mental disorders among refugees and asylum seekers. However, individual participant differences in response to SH+ remain largely unknown. The Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analysis synthesizes raw datasets of trials to provide cutting-edge evidence of outcomes that cannot be examined by conventional meta-analytic approaches. Objectives: This protocol outlines the methods of a series of IPD meta-analyses aimed at examining the effects and potential moderators of SH+ in (a) reducing depressive symptoms at post-intervention and (b) preventing the six-month cumulative incidence of mental disorders in refugees and asylum seekers. Method: RCTs on SH+ have been identified through WHO and all authors have agreed to share the datasets of the trials. The primary outcomes of the IPD meta-analyses are (a) reduction in depressive symptoms at post-intervention, and (b) prevention of six-month cumulative incidence of mental disorders. Secondary outcomes include post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, well-being, functioning, quality of life, and twelve-month cumulative incidence of mental disorders. One-stage IPD meta-analyses will be performed using mixed-effects linear/logistic regression. Missing data will be handled by multiple imputation. Conclusions: These results will enrich current knowledge about the response to SH+ and will facilitate its targeted dissemination. The results of these IPD meta-analyses will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20008198.2021.1930690

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karyotaki, E., Sijbrandij, M., Purgato, M., Acarturk, C., Lakin, D., Bailey, D., Peckham, E., Uygun, E., Tedeschi, F., Wancata, J., Augustinavicius, J., Carswell, K., Välimäki, M., van Ommeren, M., Koesters, M., Popa, M., Leku, M. R., Anttila, M., Churchill, R., White, R., Al-Hashimi, S., Lantta, T., Au, T., Klein, T., Tol, W. A., Cuijpers, P., & Barbui, C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Department of Psychology, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of York (GB)
  • Istanbul Bilgi University (TR)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  • Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • HealthRight Uganda, Arua, Uganda
  • University of Turku (FI)
Corresponding author
Karyotaki, Eirini
Venue
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2021-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
1930690-1930690
ISSN
2000-8066 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3178656551
Cited by
9
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Psychotraumatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Collections portal (Koç University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • VU Research Portal (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Commission (grant agreement n. 779255)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
refugees, asylum seekers, common mental disorders, depressive symptoms, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychological distress, individual patient data meta-analysis, treatment moderators, well-being, quality of life
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, Adult, Mental Disorders, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Refugees, Research Design, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Meta-Analysis as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review