Cited by 67Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Food & mood: a review of supplementary prebiotic and probiotic interventions in the treatment of anxiety and depression in adults

Open access
Noonan, Sanjay, Zaveri, Meena, Macaninch, Elaine, Martyn, Kathy·2020·BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A bidirectional relationship exists between the brain and the gastrointestinal tract. Foods containing bacteria that positively influence the gastrointestinal microbiome are termed, probiotics; compounds that promote the flourishing of these bacteria are termed, prebiotics. Whether microbiome influencing therapies could treat psychiatric conditions, including depression and anxiety, is an area of interest. Presently, no established consensus for such treatment exists. METHODS: This systematic review analyses databases and grey literature sites to investigate pre and/or probiotics as treatments for depression and/or anxiety disorders. Articles included are from within 15 years. Pre-determined inclusion exclusion criteria were applied, and articles were appraised for their quality using a modified-CASP checklist. This review focuses specifically on quantitative measures from patients with clinical diagnoses of depression and/or anxiety disorders. RESULTS: 7 studies were identified. All demonstrated significant improvements in one or more of the outcomes measuring the of effect taking pre/probiotics compared with no treatment/placebo, or when compared to baseline measurements. DISCUSSION: Our review suggests utilising pre/probiotic may be a potentially useful adjunctive treatment. Furthermore, patients with certain co-morbidities, such as IBS, might experience greater benefits from such treatments, given that pre/probiotic are useful treatments for other conditions that were not the primary focus of this discourse. Our results are limited by several factors: sample sizes (adequate, though not robust); short study durations, long-term effects and propensity for remission undetermined. CONCLUSION: Our results affirm that pre/probiotic therapy warrants further investigation. Efforts should aim to elucidate whether the perceived efficacy of pre/probiotic therapy in depression and/or anxiety disorders can be replicated in larger test populations, and whether such effects are maintained through continued treatment, or post cessation. Interventions should also be investigated in isolation, not combination, to ascertain where the observed effects are attributable to. Efforts to produce mechanistic explanations for such effect should be a priority.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjnph-2019-000053

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews reported promising, although preliminary, evidence for the potential of probiotics to improve anxiety, depression, and subjective stress in human populations.

    “Similarly, recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews reported promising, although preliminary, evidence for the potential of probiotics to improve anxiety, depression, and subjective stress in human populations (225-228).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]Yadav VK Serotonin: the central link between bone mass and energy metabolism: Karsenty G, Translational endocrinology of bone. 1st edn Cambridge, Massachusettes: Academic Press, 2013: 51– 62.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noonan, S., Zaveri, M., Macaninch, E., & Martyn, K.
Affiliations
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
  • Brighton, UK
  • Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Brighton (GB)
Corresponding author
Noonan, Sanjay
Venue
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-07-06
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
351-362
ISSN
2516-5542 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3039354549
Cited by
67
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Nutrition Prevention & Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
probiotics, prebiotics, depression, anxiety disorders, gut microbiota, gut-brain axis, adjunctive therapy, irritable bowel syndrome, food and mood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review