Cited by 87Probiotics and Fermented FoodsSchizophrenia research and treatmentGut microbiota and health

A Systematic Review of the Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Schizophrenia Symptoms

Ng, Qin Xiang, Soh, Alex Yu Sen, Venkatanarayanan, Nandini, Ho, Collin Yih Xian, Lim, Donovan Yutong, Yeo, Wee-Song·2019·Neuropsychobiology

Abstract

Background Derangements of the gut microbiome have been linked to increased systemic inflammation and central nervous system disorders, including schizophrenia. This systematic review thus aimed to investigate the hypothesis that probiotic supplementation improves schizophrenia symptoms. Methods By using the keywords (probiotic OR gut OR microbiota OR microbiome OR yogurt OR yoghurt OR lactobacillus OR bifidobacterium) AND (schizophrenia OR psychosis), a preliminary search of the PubMed, Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, Clinical Trials Register of the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group (CCDANTR), and Cochrane Field for Complementary Medicine databases yielded 329 papers published in English between January 1, 1960 and May 1, 2018. Attempts were made to search grey literature as well. Results Three clinical studies were reviewed, comparing the use of probiotics to placebo controls. Applying per-protocol analysis and a fixed-effects model, there was no significant difference in schizophrenia symptoms between the group that received probiotic supplementation and the placebo group post-intervention as the standardized mean difference was -0.0884 (95% CI -0.380 to 0.204, p = 0.551). Separate analyses were performed to investigate the effect of probiotic supplementation on positive or negative symptoms of schizophrenia alone. In both instances, no significant difference was observed as well. Conclusion Based on current evidence, limite…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000498862

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ng, Q. X., Soh, A. Y. S., Venkatanarayanan, N., Ho, C. Y. X., Lim, D. Y., & Yeo, W.-S.
Affiliations
  • KK Women's and Children's Hospital (SG)
  • National University Hospital (SG)
  • MOH Holdings (SG)
  • Institute of Mental Health (SG)
Venue
Neuropsychobiology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2019
Volume
78
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 0302-282X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0224
OpenAlex
W2925513119
Cited by
87
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
probiotics, schizophrenia, gut microbiota, probiotic supplementation, psychotic symptoms, positive symptoms, negative symptoms, systemic inflammation, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, yogurt, antipsychotic adverse effects
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Humans, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Dietary Supplements, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review