Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 386

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Job stress and burnout in hospital employees: comparisons of different medical professions in a regional hospital in Taiwan

Open access
Chou, Li-Ping, Li, Chung-Yi, Hu, Susan C·2014·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the prevalence and associated factors of burnout among five different medical professions in a regional teaching hospital. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Hospital-based survey. Participants: A total of 1329 medical professionals were recruited in a regional hospital with a response rate of 89%. These voluntary participants included 101 physicians, 68 physician assistants, 570 nurses, 216 medical technicians and 374 administrative staff. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Demographic data included gender, age, level of education and marital status, and work situations, such as position, work hours and work shifts, were obtained from an electronic questionnaire. Job strain and burnout were measured by two validated questionnaires, the Chinese version of the Job Content Questionnaire and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory. Results: Among the five medical professions, the prevalence of high work-related burnout from highest to lowest was nurses (66%), physician assistants (61.8%), physicians (38.6%), administrative staff (36.1%) and medical technicians (31.9%), respectively. Hierarchical regression analysis indicated that job strain, overcommitment and low social support explained the most variance (32.6%) of burnout. Conclusions: Physician assistant is an emerging high burnout group; its severity is similar to that of nurses and far more than that of physicians, administrative staff and medical technicians. These findings may contribute to the development of feasible strategies to reduce the stress which results in the burnout currently plaguing most hospitals in Taiwan.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004185

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kivimäki, 2013, Job strain and coronary heart disease—authors’ reply, Lancet, 381, 448, 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60244-5 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60244-5
  2. Ho, 2010, The relationship between job stress and physical-mental health among hospital staff, Chin J Occup Med, 17, 239
  3. Yeh, 2008, Factors associated with workers’ burnout and “over-commitment to work”: a survey among employees of 36 companies in Taipei city, Taiwan J Public Health, 27, 463

Cited by

See all 386

Metadata

Authors
Chou, L.-P., Li, C.-Y., & Hu, S. C.
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-02
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
e004185
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130806885
Cited by
386
References
28
FWCI
33.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Job stress and burnout in hospital employees: comparisons of different medical professions in a regional hospital in Taiwan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004185
The paper
Chou, L.-P., Li, C.-Y., & Hu, S. C. (2014). Job stress and burnout in hospital employees: comparisons of different medical professions in a regional hospital in Taiwan. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004185

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.