Cited by 179Diabetes Management and EducationMental Health Treatment and AccessChronic Disease Management Strategies

Collaborative care for comorbid depression and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Atlantis, Evan, Fahey, Paul, Foster, Jann·2014·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objective: The collaborative care model is recommended for depression in adults with a chronic physical health problem like diabetes. We sought to systematically assess the effect of collaborative care on depression and glycaemia in adults with comorbid depression and diabetes to inform guidelines and practice. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Health Source Nursing, MEDLINE, PsychINFO and reference lists of retrieved articles published before August 2013. Inclusion criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on collaborative care (ie, coordinated multidisciplinary model of care) for depression that reported the effects on depression and glycaemic outcomes in adults with comorbid clinically relevant depression and diabetes were eligible. Data extraction and analysis: Data on the mean difference in depression and glycaemic outcomes were extracted and pooled using random effects meta-analysis. Results: Seven RCTs included for review reported effects on depression outcomes in 1895 participants, and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level in 1556 participants. Collaborative care significantly improved the depression score (standardised mean difference was −0.32 (95% CI −0.53 to −0.11); I 2=79%) and HbA1c level (weighted mean difference was −0.33% (95% CI −0.66% to −0.00%); I 2=72.9%) compared with control conditions. Depression remission did not predict better glycaemic control across studies. Conclusions: Limited evidence from short-to-medium term RCTs predominantly conducted in the USA suggests that collaborative care for depression significantly improves both depression and glycaemia outcomes, independently, in people with comorbid depression and diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004706

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. [3]Atlantis E Excess burden of type 1 and type 2 diabetes due to psychopathology. J Affect Disord 2012; 142 (Suppl): S36– 41 23062855
  2. [4]Lin EHB Von Korff M Consortium WWS Mental disorders among persons with diabetes—results from the World Mental Health Surveys. J Psychosom Res 2008; 65: 571– 80 19027447 PMC3672403
  3. [6]Lin EHB Katon W Von Korff M Relationship of depression and diabetes self-care, medication adherence, and preventive care. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 2154– 60 15333477
  4. [7]Atlantis E Goldney RD Eckert KA Trends in health-related quality of life and health service use associated with comorbid diabetes and major depression in South Australia, 1998–2008. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2012; 47: 871– 7 21590369
  5. [8]Lin EHB Rutter CM Katon W Depression and advanced complications of diabetes—a prospective cohort study. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 264– 9 19933989 PMC2809260
  6. [10]Molosankwe I Patel A Gagliardino JJ Economic aspects of the association between diabetes and depression: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 2012; 142: S42– 55 23062857
  7. [13]Van der Feltz-Cornelis CM Nuyen J Stoop C Effect of interventions for major depressive disorder and significant depressive symptoms in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2010; 32: 380– 95 20633742
  8. [14]Ekers D Murphy R Archer J Nurse-delivered collaborative care for depression and long-term physical conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2013; 149: 14– 22 23545062
  9. [15]Huang Y Wei X Wu T Collaborative care for patients with depression and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2013; 13: 260 24125027 PMC3854683
  10. [16]Bogner HR Morales KH de Vries HF Integrated management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and depression treatment to improve medication adherence: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med 2012; 10: 15– 22 22230826 PMC3262455
  11. [21]DerSimonian R Laird N Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177– 88 3802833
  12. [22]Higgins JP Thompson SG Deeks JJ Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557– 60 12958120 PMC192859
  13. [23]Higgins JP Thompson SG Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539– 58 12111919
  14. [24]Egger M Davey Smith G Schneider M Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315: 629– 34 9310563 PMC2127453
  15. [25]Morgan MAJ Coates MJ Dunbar JA The TrueBlue model of collaborative care using practice nurses as case managers for depression alongside diabetes or heart disease: a randomised trial. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e002171 PMC3563126 23355671
  16. [26]Bogner HR de Vries HF Integrating type 2 diabetes mellitus and depression treatment among African Americans: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Diabetes Educ 2010; 36: 284– 92 20040705 PMC2858776
  17. [27]Ell K Katon W Xie B Collaborative care management of major depression among low-income, predominantly hispanic subjects with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 706– 13 20097780 PMC2845010
  18. [28]Katon WJ Korff M Lin EH The pathways study: a randomized trial of collaborative care in patients with diabetes and depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry [ serial on the Internet]. 2004; 61 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/o/cochrane/clcentral/articles/912/CN-00491912/frame.html 15466678
  19. [29]Williams JW Jr Katon W Lin EHB The effectiveness of depression care management on diabetes-related outcomes in older patients. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 1015– 24 +I-51 15197019
  20. [30]Johnson JA Al Sayah F Wozniak L Controlled trial of a collaborative primary care team model for patients with diabetes and depression: rationale and design for a comprehensive evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res 2012; 12: 258 22897901 PMC3445824
  21. [33]Von Korff M Katon WJ Lin EH Functional outcomes of multi-condition collaborative care and successful ageing: results of randomised trial. BMJ (Clin Res ed) 2011; 343: d6612 PMC3213240 22074851
  22. [34]Hay JW Katon WJ Ell K Cost-effectiveness analysis of collaborative care management of major depression among low-income, predominantly Hispanics with diabetes. Value Health 2012; 15: 249– 54 22433755 PMC3310347
  23. [35]Katon W Russo J Lin EHB Cost-effectiveness of a multicondition collaborative care intervention. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012; 69: 506– 14 22566583 PMC3840955
  24. [36]Jacob V Chattopadhyay SK Sipe TA Economics of collaborative care for management of depressive disorders: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2012; 42: 539– 49 22516496
  25. [37]Zhang Y Hu G Yuan Z Glycosylated hemoglobin in relationship to cardiovascular outcomes and death in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e42551 22912709 PMC3415427
  26. [38]Lin EH Von Korff M Ciechanowski P Treatment adjustment and medication adherence for complex patients with diabetes, heart disease, and depression: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med 2012; 10: 6– 14 22230825 PMC3262469
  27. [42]Shi Z Taylor AW Wittert G Soft drink consumption and mental health problems among adults in Australia. Public Health Nutr 2010; 13: 1073– 9 20074392
  28. [43]Rimer J Dwan K Lawlor DA Exercise for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 7: CD004366 22786489
  29. [45]Roberts RG Gask L Arndt B Depression and diabetes: the role and impact of models of health care systems. J Affect Disord 2012; 142: S80– 8 23062862

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atlantis, E., Fahey, P., & Foster, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Atlantis, Evan
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-04
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
e004706
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064974721
Cited by
179
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
collaborative care, depression, diabetes mellitus, comorbid depression, glycemic control, HbA1c, depression remission, multidisciplinary care, chronic physical illness
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Patient Care Team

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review