Cited by 20Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietChildren's Physical and Motor Development

Family-based interventions to increase physical activity in children: a meta-analysis and realist synthesis protocol

Open access
Brown, Helen Elizabeth, Atkin, Andrew J, Panter, Jenna, Corder, Kirsten, Wong, Geoff, Chinapaw, Mai J M, van Sluijs, Esther·2014·BMJ Open

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite the established relationship between physical activity and health, data suggest that many children are insufficiently active, and that levels decline into adolescence. Engaging the family in interventions may increase and maintain children's physical activity levels at the critical juncture before secondary school. Synthesis of existing evidence will inform future studies, but the heterogeneity in target populations recruited, behaviour change techniques and intervention strategies employed, and measurement conducted, may require a multifaceted review method. The primary objective of this work will therefore be to synthesis evidence from intervention studies that explicitly engage the family unit to increase children's physical activity using an innovative dual meta-analysis and realist approach. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Peer-reviewed studies will be independently screened by two authors for inclusion based on (1) including 'healthy' participants aged 5-12 years; (2) having a substantive intervention aim of increasing physical activity, by engaging the family and (3) reporting on physical activity. Duplicate data extraction and quality assessment will be conducted using a specially designed proforma and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool respectively. STATA software will be used to compute effect sizes for meta-analyses, with subgroup analyses conducted to identify moderating characteristics. Realist syntheses will be conducted according to RAMESES quality and publication guidelines, including development of a programme theory and evidence mapping. DISSEMINATION: This review will be the first to use the framework of a traditional review to conduct a dual meta-analysis and realist synthesis, examining interventions that engage the family to increase physical activity in children. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences, formal presentations to policy makers and practitioners and informal meetings. Evidence generated from this synthesis will also be used to inform the development of theory-driven, evidence-based interventions aimed at engaging the family to increase physical activity levels in children. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): number CRD42013005780.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005439

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, H. E., Atkin, A. J., Panter, J., Corder, K., Wong, G., Chinapaw, M. J. M., & van Sluijs, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Department of MRC Epidemiology, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, UK
Corresponding author
Brown, Helen Elizabeth
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-08
Volume
4
Issue
8
Pages
e005439
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145682366
Cited by
20
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/7, MR/K023187/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007462/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
Keywords
family intervention, children's physical activity, family involvement, behaviour change techniques, program theory, evidence mapping
MeSH terms
Child, Family Health, Health Promotion, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Motor Activity, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Evidence-Based Practice, Sedentary Behavior, Pediatric Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review