Cited by 404Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietSchool Health and Nursing Education

Promoting physical activity participation among children and adolescents

Salmon, J., Booth, M. L., Phongsavan, P., Murphy, N., Timperio, A.·2007·Epidemiologic Reviews

Abstract

With global increases in the prevalence of overweight and obesity among children and adolescents, there has never been a more urgent need for effective physical activity programs. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the evidence of the effectiveness of interventions that report physical activity outcomes in children aged 4-12 years and adolescents aged 13-19 years. A systematic search of electronic databases identified 76 interventions. Most interventions were delivered via the school setting (57 interventions), nine through the family setting, six via primary care, and four in community- or Internet-based settings. Children's physical activity interventions that were most effective in the school setting included some focus on physical education, activity breaks, and family strategies. Interventions delivered in the family setting were not highly effective, but many were pilot studies. The use of motivationally tailored strategies and program delivery in the primary care setting showed promise among adolescents. Many studies had methodological and reporting flaws (e.g., no baseline data, poor study design, physical activity measures of unknown reliability and validity, and poor reporting of sample size, response rates, attrition/retention, compliance, year of intervention, and duration of intervention). Publications reporting the results of evaluations of intervention studies should follow the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines or, for nonrandomized studies, should follow the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs guidelines. Further evidence of the effectiveness of interventions promoting young people's physical activity in family and community settings is needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/epirev/mxm010

Cites

124 of 124 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 129 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salmon, J., Booth, M. L., Phongsavan, P., Murphy, N., & Timperio, A.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Waterford Institute of Technology (IE)
Venue
Epidemiologic Reviews
Published
2007-05-02
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
144-159
ISSN
  • 0193-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6729
OpenAlex
W2134208161
Cited by
402
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 37
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epidemiologic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SETU Waterford Libraries - Open Access Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
physical activity promotion, children, adolescents, school-based intervention, family intervention, primary care intervention, physical education, active breaks, childhood obesity, overweight, intervention effectiveness, reporting quality, CONSORT
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Obesity, School Health Services, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review