The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implementing the RISE second victim support programme at the Johns Hopkins Hospital: a case study
Open accessAbstract
Background: Second victims are healthcare workers who experience emotional distress following patient adverse events. Studies indicate the need to develop organisational support programmes for these workers. The RISE (Resilience In Stressful Events) programme was developed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital to provide this support. Objective: To describe the development of RISE and evaluate its initial feasibility and subsequent implementation. Programme phases included (1) developing the RISE programme, (2) recruiting and training peer responders, (3) pilot launch in the Department of Paediatrics and (4) hospital-wide implementation. Methods: Mixed-methods study, including frequency counts of encounters, staff surveys and evaluations by RISE peer responders. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise demographic characteristics and proportions of responses to categorical, Likert and ordinal scales. Qualitative analysis and coding were used to analyse open-ended responses from questionnaires and focus groups. Results: A baseline staff survey found that most staff had experienced an unanticipated adverse event, and most would prefer peer support. A total of 119 calls, involving ∼500 individuals, were received in the first 52 months. The majority of calls were from nurses, and very few were related to medical errors (4%). Peer responders reported that the encounters were successful in 88% of cases and 83.3% reported meeting the caller's needs. Low awareness of the programme was a barrier to hospital-wide expansion. However, over the 4 years, the rate of calls increased from ∼1–4 calls per month. The programme evolved to accommodate requests for group support. Conclusions: Hospital staff identified the need for a multidisciplinary peer support programme for second victims. Peer responders reported success in responding to calls, the majority of which were for adverse events rather than for medical errors. The low initial volume of calls emphasises the importance of promoting awareness of the value of emotional support and the availability of the programme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines
Malterud, K. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05627-6 · Cited by 5,014
Medical error: the second victim
Wu, A. W. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.726 · Cited by 1,474
Self-citationScott, S. D., Hirschinger, L. E., Cox, K. R., McCoig, M., Brandt, J., & Hall, L. W. (2009) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2009.032870 · Cited by 895
Do House Officers Learn From Their Mistakes?
Wu, A. W. (1991) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03460160067031 · Cited by 565
Self-citationHealth Care Professionals as Second Victims after Adverse Events: A Systematic Review
Seys, D., Wu, A. W., Gerven, E. V., Vleugels, A., Euwema, M., Panella, M., Scott, S. D., Conway, J., Sermeus, W., & Vanhaecht, K. (2013) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/0163278712458918 · Cited by 517
Self-citationMedical error: the second victim
Wu, A. W. (2000) · Western Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1136/ewjm.172.6.358 · Cited by 477
Self-citationCaring for Our Own: Deploying a Systemwide Second Victim Rapid Response Team
Scott, S. D., Hirschinger, L. E., Cox, K. R., McCoig, M., Hahn-Cover, K., Epperly, K. M., Phillips, E. C., & Hall, L. W. (2010) · The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety · doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(10)36038-7 · Cited by 454
Effectiveness and Efficiency of Root Cause Analysis in Medicine
Wu, A. W. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.6.685 · Cited by 370
Self-citationSuffering in silence: a qualitative study of second victims of adverse events
Ullström, S., Andreen Sachs, M., Hansson, J., Øvretveit, J., & Brommels, M. (2014) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002035 · Cited by 340
Health care workers as second victims of medical errors
Edrees, H. H., Paine, L. A., Feroli, E. R., & Wu, A. W. (2011) · Polish Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.20452/pamw.1033 · Cited by 181
Self-citation
Cited by
Resilience interventions in physicians: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Angelopoulou, P., & Panagopoulou, E. (2022) · Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/aphw.12287 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Edrees, H., Connors, C., Paine, L., Norvell, M., Taylor, H., & Wu, A. W.
- Venue
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e011708
- ISSN
- 2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2526773330
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 33.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implementing the RISE second victim support programme at the Johns Hopkins Hospital: a case study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011708
- The paper
- Edrees, H., Connors, C., Paine, L., Norvell, M., Taylor, H., & Wu, A. W. (2016). Implementing the RISE second victim support programme at the Johns Hopkins Hospital: a case study. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011708
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.