The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Health care workers as second victims of medical errors
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: "Second victims" are health care providers who are involved with patient adverse events and who subsequently have difficulty coping with their emotions. Growing attention is being paid to making system improvements to create safer health care and to the appropriate handling of patients and families harmed during the provision of medical care. In contrast, there has been little attention to helping health care workers cope with adverse events. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to emphasize the importance of support structures for second victims in the handling of patient adverse events and in building a culture of safety within hospitals. METHODS: A survey was administered to health care workers who participated in a patient safety meeting. The total number of registered participants was 350 individuals from various professions and different institutions within Johns Hopkins Medicine. The first part of the survey was paper-based and the second was administered online. RESULTS: The survey results reflected a need in "second victim" support strategies within health care organizations. Overall, informal emotional support and peer support were among the most requested and most useful strategies. CONCLUSIONS: When there is a serious patient adverse event, there are always second victims who are health care workers. The Johns Hopkins Hospital has established a "Second Victims" Work Group that will develop support strategies, particularly a peer-support program, for health care professionals within the system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Do House Officers Learn From Their Mistakes?
Wu, A. W. (1991) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03460160067031 · Cited by 565
Self-citation
Cited by
Health Care Professionals as Second Victims after Adverse Events: A Systematic Review
Seys, D., Wu, A. W., Gerven, E. V., Vleugels, A., Euwema, M., Panella, M., Scott, S. D., Conway, J., Sermeus, W., & Vanhaecht, K. (2013) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/0163278712458918 · Cited by 517
Self-citationImplementing the RISE second victim support programme at the Johns Hopkins Hospital: a case study
Edrees, H., Connors, C., Paine, L., Norvell, M., Taylor, H., & Wu, A. W. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011708 · Cited by 396
Self-citationBurlison, J. D., Scott, S. D., Browne, E. K., Thompson, S. G., & Hoffman, J. M. (2017) · Journal of Patient Safety · doi:10.1097/pts.0000000000000129 · Cited by 288
Behavioral Medicine and Informatics in the Cancer Community
Beckjord, E., Ahern, D. K., & Hesse, B. (2019) · Consumer Informatics and Digital Health · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96906-0_13 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Edrees, H. H., Paine, L. A., Feroli, E. R., & Wu, A. W.
- Venue
- Polish Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- Medycyna Praktyczna
- Published
- 2011-04-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 101-108
- ISSN
- 0032-3772 (ISSN-L)
- 1897-9483
- OpenAlex
- W2189387323
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health care workers as second victims of medical errors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.20452/pamw.1033
- The paper
- Edrees, H. H., Paine, L. A., Feroli, E. R., & Wu, A. W. (2011). Health care workers as second victims of medical errors. Polish Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.1033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.