Cited by 159Child Development and Digital TechnologyEducational Methods and ImpactsImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Correlates of mobile screen media use among children aged 0–8: a systematic review

Open access
Paudel, Susan, Jancey, Jonine, Subedi, Narayan, Leavy, Justine·2017·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objective: This study is a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature to identify the correlates of mobile screen media use among children aged 8 years and less. Setting: Home or community-based studies were included in this review while child care or school-based studies were excluded. Participants: Children aged 8 years or less were the study population. Studies that included larger age groups without subgroup analysis specific to the 0–8 years category were excluded. Eight electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed English language primary research articles published or in press between January 2009 and March 2017 that have studied correlates of mobile screen media use in this age group. Outcome measure: Mobile screen media use was the primary outcome measure. Mobile screen media use refers to children’s use of mobile screens, such as mobile phones, electronic tablets, handheld computers or personal digital assistants. Results: Thirteen studies meeting the inclusion criteria were identified of which a total of 36 correlates were examined. Older children, children better skilled in using mobile screen media devices, those having greater access to such devices at home and whose parents had high mobile screen media use were more likely to have higher use of mobile screen media devices. No association existed with parent’s age, sex and education. Conclusion: Limited research has been undertaken into young children’s mobile screen media use and most of the variables have been studied too infrequently for robust conclusions to be reached. Future studies with objective assessment of mobile screen media use and frequent examination of the potential correlates across multiple studies and settings are recommended. Trial registration number: This review is registered with PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews (registration number: CRD42015028028 ).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014585

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [15]American Academy of Pediatrics. American academy of pediatrics announces new recommendations for children’s media use USA, 2017 https://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/pages/american-academy-of-pediatrics-announces-new-recommendations-for-childrens-media-use.aspx
  2. [53]Chiong C, Shuler C Learning: Is there an app for that? Investigations of young children’s usage and learning with mobile devices and apps. New York: Sesame Workshop, 2010.

Cited by

Authors
Paudel, S., Jancey, J., Subedi, N., & Leavy, J.
Affiliations
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • Tribhuvan University (NP)
Corresponding author
Paudel, Susan
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-10
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
e014585
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767046731
Cited by
159
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Own your potential (DEAKIN) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (acceptedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Curtin University of Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
young children, parental screen use, mobile devices
MeSH terms
Attitude to Computers, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Parents, Time Factors, Parenting, Guidelines as Topic, Computers, Handheld, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review