Cited by 82Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic Care

Increase in assisted suicide in Switzerland: did the socioeconomic predictors change? Results from the Swiss National Cohort

Open access
Steck, Nicole, Junker, Christoph, Zwahlen, Marcel·2018·BMJ Open

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the strong increase in assisted suicides in Switzerland since 2008 is linked to a shift in the socioeconomic factors associated with assisted suicide and its related diagnoses. METHODS: In a population-based longitudinal study, we investigated assisted suicides in Switzerland over the period 2003-2014. Two groups of younger (25-64 years) and older (65-94 years) persons were analysed separately and compared. We calculated crude rates and used Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models to examine associations of assisted dying with gender, marital status, education, religion, neighbourhood socioeconomic status and other variables, and investigated trends over time. RESULTS: We identified 3941 assisted suicides among 6 237 997 Swiss residents, 80% of which occurred in the older age group. Crude rates of assisted suicide more than tripled during the study period from 3.60 to 11.21 per 100 000 person-years; the increase was more pronounced in the older age group. Cancer was the most common underlying diagnosis (41.8%), but the percentage dying assisted was highest among patients with diseases of the nervous system (5.25% in the younger and 1.23% in the older age group). The factors associated with assisted suicide did not change during the study period. Female gender, higher education, having no religious affiliation, no children and a Swiss passport, living in a neighbourhood with a higher socioeconomic index and living in the French-speaking part of Switzerland were associated with a higher rate. CONCLUSIONS: The study results do not indicate any shift in socioeconomic factors associated with assisted suicide, but a more pronounced increase in incidence among the elderly.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020992

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [15]Regional euthanasia review c. JAARVERSLAG 2016; 2015.
  2. [23]Calabrò RS, Naro A, De Luca R, et al The Right to Die in Chronic Disorders of Consciousness: Can We Avoid the Slippery Slope Argument? Innov Clin Neurosci 2016; 13(11-12): 12– 24. PMC5300707 28210521

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steck, N., Junker, C., & Zwahlen, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Federal Statistical Office (CH)
Corresponding author
Steck, Nicole
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-04
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
e020992
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802886894
Cited by
82
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Funders
Swiss National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
assisted suicide, assisted dying, socioeconomic predictors, older adults, cancer, neurological disorders, gender differences, marital status, neighborhood socioeconomic status, French-speaking Switzerland, Switzerland, incidence trends
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Residence Characteristics, Socioeconomic Factors, Switzerland, Suicide, Assisted, Censuses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review