Cited by 73Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Euthanasia in Belgium: trends in reported cases between 2003 and 2013

Open access
Dierickx, Sigrid, Deliens, Luc, Cohen, Joachim, Chambaere, Kenneth·2016·Canadian Medical Association Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2002, the Belgian Act on Euthanasia came into effect, regulating the intentional ending of life by a physician at the patient's explicit request. We undertook this study to describe trends in officially reported euthanasia cases in Belgium with regard to patients' sociodemographic and clinical profiles, as well as decision-making and performance characteristics. METHODS: technique. We also compared and analyzed trends for cases reported in Dutch and in French. RESULTS: The number of reported euthanasia cases increased every year, from 235 (0.2% of all deaths) in 2003 to 1807 (1.7% of all deaths) in 2013. The rate of euthanasia increased significantly among those aged 80 years or older, those who died in a nursing home, those with a disease other than cancer and those not expected to die in the near future (p < 0.001 for all increases). Reported cases in 2013 most often concerned those with cancer (68.7%) and those under 80 years (65.0%). Palliative care teams were increasingly often consulted about euthanasia requests, beyond the legal requirements to do so (p < 0.001). Among cases reported in Dutch, the proportion in which the person was expected to die in the foreseeable future decreased from 93.9% in 2003 to 84.1% in 2013, and palliative care teams were increasingly consulted about the euthanasia request (from 34.0% in 2003 to 42.6% in 2013). These trends were not significant for cases reported in French. INTERPRETATION: Since legalization of euthanasia in Belgium, the number of reported cases has increased each year. Most of those receiving euthanasia were younger than 80 years and were dying of cancer. Given the increases observed among non-terminally ill and older patients, this analysis shows the importance of detailed monitoring of developments in euthanasia practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1503/cmaj.160202

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Belgium and the Netherlands, the prevalence of PAD due to psychiatric suffering has increased over the past years.

    “In Belgium and the Netherlands, the prevalence of PAD due to psychiatric suffering has increased over the past years.3,4”

    From Irremediable Psychiatric Suffering in the Context of Physician-assisted Death: A Scoping Review of Arguments: La souffrance psychiatrique irrémédiable dans le contexte du suicide assisté : Une revue étendue des arguments (2020) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Results report that the share of Belgian euthanasia cases involving a neuropsychiatric disorder rose from 0.8% to 3.9% between 2003 and 2013. This supports an increase in a related category, but the paper does not establish a trend specifically for PAD due to psychiatric suffering in the Netherlands; its Interpretation mentions only an increase in Dutch reported cases overall. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Belgium, a study examining the first 10 years after legislation (2003-2013) (all euthanasia cases n=8,752) reported that the average psychiatric disorders annual change was +0.3%.

    “A study examining the first 10 years after legislation (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013) (all euthanasia cases: n=8,752) (Dierickx et al., 2016) reported that the average psychiatric disorders annual change was +0.3%.”

    From Euthanasia and assisted suicide in psychiatric patients: A systematic review of the literature (2021) · cites this paper as Dierickx et al., 2016

    The Results report 8,752 euthanasia cases from 2003 through 2013. Table 2 gives an average annual change of +0.3% for neuropsychiatric disorders, but the claim calls this the change for psychiatric disorders specifically; the paper's category is broader. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Physical and psychological suffering increased during years (average annual change +1.8%), while physical suffering only and psychological suffering only decreased (average annual change -1.5% and -0.3% respectively).

    “Physical and psychological suffering increased during years (average annual change: +1.8%), while physical suffering only and psychological suffering only decreased (average annual change: -1.5% and -0.3% respectively).”

    From Euthanasia and assisted suicide in psychiatric patients: A systematic review of the literature (2021) · cites this paper as Dierickx et al., 2016

    Table 2 (shown under Conclusion; page unavailable) reports average annual changes of +1.8% for cases reporting both physical and psychological suffering and −1.5% for physical suffering only. The available passage cuts off before the psychological-suffering-only row, so it does not verify the claimed −0.3% figure. These are changes in the proportions of reported euthanasia cases, not measures of suffering in the wider population. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [22]22. Annual report 2012 [report in Dutch]. The Hague (The Netherlands): Regional Euthanasia Review Committees; 2013. Available: https://www.euthanasiecommissie.nl/de-toetsings commissies/uitspraken/jaarverslagen/2012/nl-en-du -fr/nl-en-du -fr /jaarverslag-2012 (accessed 2016 Sept. 2).
  2. [25]25. Annual report 2014 [report in Dutch]. The Hague (The Netherlands): Regional Euthanasia Review Committees: 2015. Available: https://www.euthanasiecommissie.nl/de -toetsingscommissies/uitspraken/jaarverslagen/2014/nl/nl/ jaarverslag-2014 (accessed 2016 Sept. 2).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dierickx, S., Deliens, L., Cohen, J., & Chambaere, K.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Venue
Canadian Medical Association Journal
Published
2016-09-12
Volume
188
Issue
16
Pages
E407-E414
ISSN
  • 0820-3946 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-2329
OpenAlex
W2520003588
Cited by
73
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Medical Association Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
euthanasia, Belgium, physician-assisted death, palliative care team, cancer, elderly patients, sociodemographic factors, decision-making, Netherlands, France
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Belgium, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Databases, Factual, Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review